RE: Tricoya plant18 Sep 2022 11:41
It's a good question Mr Karate
Surely writing off the plant when all the heavy lifting has been done makes no sense? The independent reviews of the Tricoya product seem very good. If not profitable currently due to gas price surely it would be better to complete the plant as a low priority (as they are doing), continue to test it until satisfied then put it on a care and maintenance (to use a mining term) program until gas prices reduce which they surely will.
Initially writing off the investment there would not be good for the SP, but longer term I don't really feel I can speculate.
All this is my fault I'm afraid, I watched this share for ages attracted by the product but put off because it was run by the brother of the idiot politician Clegg. Then I decided for go for it, and the SP have been on a one way journey since! The damage has been caused by the wording in the RNS saying anything is possible. I still think that maybe full control of the Hull plant may prove to be a good idea, and the veiled threat of abandonment may be an attempt at brinksmanship with a recalcitrant workforce