RE: Peeps ( AST ) stop kidding yourself6 Dec 2018 15:46
Why you would give an unrelated example as proof that AST have no case is beyond me..... a case where pollution has resulted in prosecution..... not surprised the courts didn't rule in their favour.
Let's see what response Colin is going to get from the no win no fee lawyers and go from there..... my decision to remain invested was significantly driven by 2 facts.
1. There has been hydrocarbon extraction in the area for over 60 years
2. We had already been given the permit, subsequently recinded on a basis that was thrown out by the Slovenian courts....