Member Info for Joeman1

In my opinion this is an important mention. I cant remember the last time we had someone like John specifically talk us up.
I know these guys often have their own agendas but if the FS is good, this will have put a fresh spotlight on the stock at just the right time.
Need the FS to be good .....GLA

Happy new year guys. Let's hope early 2020 is the period when the direction of Kodal forments. The last RNS was an apology.... the bright side is whenever we have been given these short extensions to major milestones..... the new date tends to be held...

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/30/battery-developments-in-the-last-decade-created-a-seismic-shift-that-will-play-out-in-the-next-10-years.html

Preaching to the converted.

I dont know Daz... because at those sale prices everyone is on a loss..... unless someone is trying to generate instability by selling a few big chunks in the hope that it becomes a more tradable stock..... I dont know.
Not sure I buy the leaky ship/ bad FS arguement though.... the reports have been almost complete for months so shouldnt be share killing new info there to leak.... I.e. we should have told already.
Maybe the leaky ship is the permit application will be January following bulk sample processing....
Just guessing.... and yet again hanging on news that is threatening to be late.... ho ho ho

Friday looked to be a deficit day....... today appears to be in balance... very frustrating trying to follow the markets using this tool. It's either misleading or more sales in the pipeline.... sofar the deficit, including friday is only about £5k in sales.... but a 400k drop in market cap......

https://twitter.com/LithiumWorld/status/1207450745542299649?s=19
Quality.... quality ..... quality...... if the quality of what we have is good for battery grade then the potential is still there for us..... what is taking so long with the RNS BA?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/swiss-battery-maker-favors-electric-025548215.html"The transport market isnt growing as fast as it could......... contrained by capacity"Statement from a company not even looking a personal EVs... This isnt a ramp for Kodal.... but I really feel 2020 lithium market will bd like a released rubber band.....boom..... Merry Christmas everyone (finished work for the year.... currently in the pub)

Problem you all have.... is without new information you are going round in circles. Let's save our snuff for the FS dissection.
I think the problem with the failing WA mines is market for the majority of their product, which is not battery grade. It's not the equipment. If we get tied up with a supply chain buyer before we spend a cent we will not be comparable to them.

Imo..... we need to get a light shon on this.

I'm not going to speculate on WHY the sample hasnt been processed.
What I will say is, this is a production facility with targets to achieve..... we will get to process the sample when they allow us to.... why they havent found a window yet? I dont believe any of us know why..... unless it gets communicated

https://twitter.com/sdmoores/status/1206570265234280448?s=19
Battery production capacity increases in 2019....

They must be in possession of the FS BiB in order to progress the translation thereof.
The only thought I had was they intend to include an addendum to cover the results of the bulk sample processing..... however without that the FS must be complete..... surely.

This wait is doing my nerves no good at all. I know they are translating the FS for the permit application, but that is no reason not to release it to the market in English beforehand.
The amount of news they could be giving us could almost fill an RNS advent calendar.....
I need to know........ I cant take the suspense.

The real KOD paradox is this.... it hasnt been a tradable share.....steady downward so I see nobody making money from this current position.... if BA delivers before Christmas, we will go into the holidays knowing what to expect from 2020..... without the info we are (including me) just considering our navels.... and some have more fluff than others there.
The interim accounts.... let's be honest.... we already knew how much was remaining in the coffers. There were no surprises there.
Good luck to all here.... let's hope the news comes next week as AR suggests. W

I think it was an error... the money market setting the prevailing price at .004 missed a decimal place but quickly rectified it. Doesnt I make you wonder what actually sets the price here?

https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/lithium
I'm not a charterist Daz, but if you stick this chart on the 1Y view, I think the trend looks obvious... beginnings of an improvement....but wtfdik?

Some discussion of financing in the FS RNS when it comes might help shareprice. If we know where they are going for the money, it might attract some big buyers.

https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1XW24N?__twitter_impression=true

Come on BA, it looks like the money might be about to return to the sector...... get everything done so you can showcase what it is we have here..... #qualityisking#fundingisfundamental

Yes INI .... all reported as extending along strike... dont want to say anymore for fear of someone pressing the ramper buzzer...lol

Truth? dont know Daz.

If I was to speculate, id say that the bulk sample sent is from the area that required flotation to achieve the grade. Remember the bulk sample was already in the port before they announced that they had changed the focus of first production to the smaller, better quality area (i apologise as I cant remember which area is which and I dont have the time at the moment to put the correct names to my comment).
That would mean that what is being tested is the larger resource that requires greater processing and the lions share of the CAPEX.
If you wanted to be negative you would say that it looks like we will be designing the dms, and first production off the lab tests....
If you wanted to be positive (and you know I fall on that side) you would say that we are getting real plant data to support the design of the "difficult" , "Expensive" and "Risky" section of the plant, that is KEY to supporting an acceptable 9year LOM (i.e. as BiB has rightly stated, a 3 year mine life would not get funding).

Sound reasonable? it is just speculation though.