Member Info for JiffyBag

I'm not exactly sure why some of you are comparing GST to ARB a bitcoin miner????

Can you educate me on the similarities, cos I can see NONE so far:O)

Re: LSE Tue 19th October interview with SD and the 5% , now is your time to pose a question , I have.

Will it get taken up? we will have to see :O)

https://www.lse.co.uk/share-prices/

Again, love it, que Jones Richard ? :O)

HaHa

Interesting post SAS,

The thing for me personally is, if the largest percentage of shares are owned by PI's then we have nothing to fear as we all know that over the next 2 years or so, GGP's share in value terms is very most likely to increase substantially in value given the drilling results that we already know about have not been yet been included in todays PFS/resources etc.

However, as regards a takeover???, would NCM want to act now or later when the value of Havieron has increased in value? This should be the guiding thought IMHO if a T/O proposition was on the cards.

Is there a price manipulation exercise going on and a control of the data being released by NCM to suppress the price in order to assist a cheap takeover?

I can't answer that question, nor can anyone else on this BB, but I readily admit it has crossed my mind as of late, and it is something that should not be totally dismissed out of hand. I dam well hope not!

On the other side of the equation, should NCM be interested in taking all of Havieron then that might attract other outsiders for our 30% share, but I do believe SD wants to retain as much as we can of our Havieron share because he knows the cash generated by Havieron will fund our share and the future development of GGP.

We are now at a very interesting point in this journey, given the status of our SP at the moment.

Rodge,

Re: 'We all know AIM is sentiment driven 99% of the time.'

The fact is .......GST are main market, not the corrupt AIM market ,thankfully.

Check it out .:O)

A bit of a Motley Fool type article if you ask me :O)

Hi Sandgrounded, Re Proactive article, yes it was muted.

'But whichever way the shares move, the deeper question must be: is Greatland more valuable to Newcrest as a 30% partner or, as seems intuitively to be the case, would it make more sense for Newcrest to buy Havieron or Greatland itself outright?
The time for those sorts of decisions may not quite be upon us yet.
But the pre-feasibility study will certainly give guideposts to the way forward from here.'

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/962808/greatland-gold-shareholders-await-havieron-pre-feasibility-study-with-baited-breath-962808.html

Anyway, I'm sure there will be lots more interest in the coming months ........'Greatland Gold set to become the second lowest cost gold company globally'

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/962884/greatland-gold-plc-set-to-become-the-second-lowest-cost-gold-company-globally-962884.html

Sandgrounded Re: 'It almost seems like they are trying to test the patience of the pi’s, for whatever reason'

So the institutions can get in cheaper ?:O)

A shameless ramper, make a quick entrance ,comes out with preposterous SP predictions, and then makes a quick exit.

Yesterday it was GGP today it's GST, must be going through the alphabet or Top of the Pop's risers :O)

Interesting concept......I will accept 100p just now, and no less, why?????? because I know it's worth more to NCM in the long run, we will just have to sit this out, let the games commence :O)

Hi Uni,

Fair enough, will just have to wait...roll on December for a revised MRE, still think more data could have been added in tonights PFS .... given NCM's sense of urgency:O)

'He has really emphasised how preliminary this is and how so much is left out if the pfs. Pretty impressive.'

Really?, issue is and I know we were all told well beforehand etc, why has so much been left out?

Is it because we are still waiting for Lab results...:O) or is it because NCM are looking to take a stake in GGP or the whole Shabang? I do have a few reservations on that score :O)

Processing costs ONLY!

The Telfer infrastructure is not included in the scope of the Joint Venture assets, so the Tolling
Agreement is the route by which Greatland will bear the capital, operating and haulage costs involved with processing

SW,

Re: 'They've made a very big gold deposit look distinctly average...'

And why do you think that is?

Answer, because if you had watched the videos with SD, we were told time and time again that the PFS was BASED on results as up to the end of March 2021 and that as yet we know that much much more data has NOT been included in the Pre Feasability Study, Yes or No?

'PFS based on Ore Reserves of 14Mt and does not consider 37Mt of Inferred Mineral Resource'

Hi Sharetime,

Look at the RNS's over past 12 months , look at the GST website, look at the recent GST prospectus, look at comments on this BB.

That wil quickly get you up to speed and good luck in your investment in GST.

Just to add, so far the private retail investor owns a great chunk of GGP as Hydrogen has already alluded to.

Will be good to get the next BT update :O)

Re SD will not sell out?

The one and only way any outside company is going to successfully win a bid for Havieron is simply by buying NCM at the end of the day given NCM's almost complete 70% acquisition.

Would GGP be able to stop that now at such a juncture? anwser NO!, but GGP would still retain a 25-30% interest in Havieron no matter whom might win such a battle unless of course GGP were to be taken over in full and that's out of the question IMHO unless they offer us the private retail sector some serious Wonga, IMHO.

What is serious WONGA ? well lets just say £1.50 plus per share?

Tymers, Re 'possibly acquisition of the total Haverion Licence . '

I totally disagree, you don' kill the goose that lay's the golden eggs and fyour future revenue earning chicks :O)

What an absolute idiot of a journalist, can't even get his facts correct!

'Greatland and ......Newmont.....????.. are already in the early stages of developing Havieron’s mining infrastructure. '

Newcrest not Newmont!