Member Info for Jezzoo

Quady, that's the problem IMHO both sides are pushing the honest argument envelope.

When a protagonist resorts to name calling, gaslighting, etc it's normally because they aren't happy with the strength of their own side of the discussion either.

In general if you don't agree you are excluded from the inclusivity and cancelled.

They all come across as level headed people with a metered temper and a condescending manner.

If you contradict them however, they turn into the human verson of a Rottweiler who has just sat on a hornets nest.

Dragged down by the Yanks again !

I have noticed the climate change believing side of this argument constantly ask for proof of this and proof of that and seem to want to use their parameters only.

Surely to have a balanced argument, simply dismissing the other side's comments and expecting that to be proof is a flawed model isn't it ? I watched Earth on BBC 2 last night and Packhorse said it was the plants fault in the Devonian period because they stored too much CO2 and caused a near death spiral ice age whereas the earth would have been one big dead snowball. Lucky for us America was formed and there oil based society saved the world. Something like that anyway.

Jezzoo.

The phrase of the day today is :

Peer Review.

That's

Peer Review.

A new phrase of the day will be available tomorrow.

Quady, everyone posting here is cherry picking the information available to suit their world view.

And that includes me and you ole partner.

It's quite interesting reading this board, depending on what the poster wants from this company, the same information produces fifty different conclusions.

And none of them have happened yet.

I see we still have oldschoolgump with us.

I have to say, I thought ole Forest would have expired with the AGM.

Alas it's not be.

Thanks meoryou for taking the plunge !

I look forward to a rise tomorrow off the back of your sell

Martyrdom awaits !

Gonna be an interesting week.

Filter

Filter

Filter

This is real money we are dealing with here.

Time to filter the lunatic.

Give here a break chaps, it must be hard to type with your nose when they've put the strait jacket back on.

I bet those loud posts are bearable in a padded room.

So we can look forward to spikes off the back of purchase RNS's.

Business as usual and CB's forte !

Addincknt: RE Janet Daly's column;

This is a post I made on Friday saying much the same thing.

> 28 Jul 2023 13:50

One of the main sticking points of convincing sceptics that the climate change is a thing is the condescending jeering and belittling of the very people that the people who are on board are trying to win over.

Maybe they should try a carrot instead of a stick.<

The reply I got from AgArCu :

"Common misconception, jezzoo, but that isn't what the behaviour science says. It's often used as a get out of jail card by the nut jobs, but research says it's akin to saying we should be nice to people who sexually harass women to encourage them to stop. It doesn't work. Nudge works in this case, as in most cases, but 'carrot' just allows the deniers room to spread their incorrect and damaging message. And now you know 😊 "

I'm pleased to see I'm not the only one who thinks that way.

I've been away from electronical devices for 48 hrs.

I see the name calling has ramped up,nothing much about the company to read but maybe that's not so bad.

We all need a distraction I suppose.

This board is unreadable.

How insensitive ????

Do you still think you should consider their feelings?

They’ve cost me a fcukling fortune and you think I shouldn’t upset them ?

You are bonkers !

One of the main sticking points of convincing sceptics that the climate change is a thing is the condescending jeering and belittling of the very people that the people who are on board are trying to win over.

Maybe they should try a carrot instead of a stick.

Gone then.

I give up.

I honestly do.