Member Info for JDAU

Jackbal, appreciate your view, but it’s fair to say that typically an exploration company may have to fund the acquisition of assets prior to being able to explore.

There’s progress being made on exploration alongside the acquisition of new assets that will equally be progressed which all adds to a wider portfolio of projects.

Isn’t that a good thing?

“I'd say if we actually DID SOMETHING with our assets instead of gloating about the potential of them then we might just have a bouyant company.”

…“The Board of Xtract Resources Plc is pleased to provide an exploration update on the Silverking Project located in the Mumbwa District of the Central Province of Zambia where the Phase 2 drill programme has been completed on the Main Body and nearby extensions.”

“Ongoing regional exploration works have also defined two new copper soil anomalies:

o House Grid Anomaly, a 200m strike length by 150m width anomaly at 5x background.

o Solar Anomaly, a 220m strike length by 100m width”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/silverking-project-phase-2-drilling-update-6n167evqb771cue.html

I’m not sure what some of you lot are expecting an exploration company to be doing other than acquiring assets and exploring…?

I suspect some of the posters here will never be satisfied, regardless of tangible progress made.

You say that like it’s a bad thing Jezzoo… do you have a problem with being an explorer and planning to monetise our assets?

Doing this is precisely what is currently paying the bills & allowing for further exploration / acquisitions.

“Can you please not use that Ad Hominem thing as it makes you come across as that multi moniker person JDAU, I think you're better than that sarcastic twonk.”

Way to prove a point Jezzoo.

Old news isn’t futile, it’s the Information we as investors have to go on.

Not entirely sure why you’ve decided I’m also now a multi - you seem to be trying to discredit anything I have to say by attacking me personally instead of the arguments I pose(d)… nothings changed then.

For the record Jez, you’re right, I don’t know quady - or indeed much about the bb that was from - i just found it interesting that you’re being accused of being a liar on more than one bb.

Almost looks like a bit of a pattern…

“cherry picked his autistic rants”.

Wow Jez. Just wow.

Nothing about you is honest or straight shooting Jez, you post the same, negative, boring, repetitive rhetoric on a daily basis here.

It’s “oh Colin gets paid for doing nothing” despite company progress, “share price is falling” despite it being merely that a sell was reported rather than a buy, “why is no progress being made” despite multiple RNS’s across multiple projects. You shout down genuine posters such as myself whenever they challenge you about what is often inaccurate information and use a handful of nameless faceless other posters (who are definitely 100% also real) to attempt to give you some sort of authority on this bb.

Prove me wrong, start to show some substance and I’ll maybe believe that you’re actually someone with a vested interest in this company doing well.. but I don’t buy it.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, your personal investment decisions (or indeed the decisions of others) are not reflective of the current company progress.

Give a … if you timed your buys and sells wrong, that doesn’t mean XTR aren’t making tangible progress on multiple assets as you try your hardest to make others believe.

Losing money on a company because you timed your investment decision wrong doesn’t automatically give you the right to be a whining little …. Who bad mouths the company regardless of it making positive leaps forward across multiple fronts. At what point does that end?

Will XTR finally be doing well when you hit your break even?

That hardly seems like a good barometer for company success. Bad mouthing the company until that happens under the guise of stimulating conversation or bizarrely suggesting that will make the company make some progress?

Genuine investors are excited to see what the future of Xtr will bring - you and your cronies would have us all believe the sky is falling.

But you’re just having a laugh, right?

Oh look Jez, we’re up another 14% today… oh wait, that’s just a buy.

I can’t help but find it strange that constantly spamming a public forum with negative rhetoric about a company constitutes “having a laugh”…

Interesting that you’re openly being called out for being a liar on other shares bb’s too.

Appears I’m not alone in having a problem with your posting, though you’re probably just trying to ‘resuscitate the board into a state of conversation’ by posting absolute …. right?

Title: Bumper start to new month

Quote: “ 10% down. All sells No buys Oooof!”

Reality: circa £1500 shares traded, share price appeared ‘down’ due to a very small number of reported sells -yet you took it upon yourself to ‘report facts’ about the share price dropping 10% as you put it. Doesn’t that suggest you have no idea about the bid/ask system? Or how a small number of recently reported trades on shares with no volume can completely skew / don’t give a complete picture of the share price movement?

Or maybe you just had another agenda…?

Call me cynical Jez but I feel like you must know how bids and asks work, right?

But sure… you ‘definitely weren’t’ trying to paint a negative picture. Oh wait, but it was just a joke. Oh, also you were trying to ‘resuscitate the board into a state of conversation’ by constantly speaking negatively about the company.

Makes sense….

Interesting that you had nothing to say about googles 27% ‘meteoric rise’ today for Xtr.

Oh wait… that was just a buy.

“It's obvious that Jezoo started this thread ironically, and we both just reported simple facts. That's ramping/de ramping to you???”

Ahhh, the ‘it was only a joke’ routine when called out for what it was… should’ve seen that coming.

You guys need to calm down with the boom or bust posting re the share price.

There’s a large spread and very little volume - small amounts of buys or sells put the share price either closer to 0.6 or closer to 0.8… the share price isn’t crashing as Jezzoo suggested yesterday - or indeed flying as you’re suggesting today.

Circa £1500 traded yesterday and circa £1000 traded today.

Not exactly moving with any real force behind it…

Maybe people can think of better things to do with their time than try to discuss their company with a group of posters whose only purpose of posting is to drive a negative agenda?

So just to be clear…

You posting conjecture = credible.

Me posting a relevant excerpt from a regulated news source that contradicts your assertion = not credible.

Ok then, I think I’m done with this conversation.

“Additionally, Xtract is actively building partnerships with small-scale miners operating within and nearby its licences, building on the experience and local knowledge of its Moroccan partners in the sourcing, processing, and trade of antimony ores. Xtract continues to engage with the relevant ministries as well as local landowners and the small-scale mining community.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/wildstone-exploration-and-corporate-update-fjsqwx5v37vnew2.html

Apologies Jez, I didn’t realise attendance affects the validity of one’s argument. I’ve been present more often of late and that too appears to be ruffling feathers of those trying to pedal a negative agenda.

Either way I seem to be in the wrong.

I’ll stick to just posting the facts and providing details of where I’m getting my information from and we’ll leave it up to the reader to decide who’s right and who’s full of … shall we?

Sure, maybe you could make me a tinfoil hat so we can dress up and play make believe whilst you tell me all about the tale of Colin Bird and the mystery reason behind losing operational control of Manica.

Your version of events, that is.

I could also just read the RNS’s myself and form my own opinion instead of having yours rammed down my throat on a nearly daily basis.

I didn’t say that did I Jez.

I said it wouldn’t be hard to achieve and it quite blatantly happens across most LSE boards re bashing/pump&dumping.

Hence why I don’t take a statement written on a bb as fact just because several people state it.

Stating that I don’t believe you understand the operations here because you repetitively misrepresent the information that is out there in public domain isn’t ad hominem. It’s an observation based on the information you’re providing via your posting.

If you demonstrate a poor understanding, I’ll provide an explanation, as I did. It doesn’t make me the bad guy for correcting mistakes or misrepresentation of events.

Notice how I tackle your point of debate, THEN playfully mock you? No logical fallacies here…

Re being patronising, i figured that since you lot can give it out then you should be able to take it, right?

You’re right though, multiple posters posting similar negative rhetoric in an orchestrated stock bashing and being able to provide upticks to other posters who are ‘on their team’ would be so hard to achieve using a VPN and burner email addresses, wouldn’t it.

It’s not like that’s seen on basically every stock on LSE’s chat boards in order to influence share prices re shorting/pump&dumping.

This is why I like facts, references and why I rely on verifiable information to make my point instead of conjecture.

So contrary to what you posted originally in order to act like we’re kept in the dark as shareholders we have actually received several updates over the past few months regarding our various projects.

Curious how I feel reasonably well informed as a shareholder yet someone such as yourself who in his own words ‘couldn't be bothered to read that’ when information is freely presented, feels kept in the dark.

Ever considered that maybe the problem of you not understanding our operations doesn’t lie with Colin Bird?

It’s nearly the end of the day Jez, perhaps we can pick you another book to go through together and you can tell me all about how Jack and Jill sat on a wall and had a great fall after they went to sea in a beautiful pea green boat.

I’ll be happy to correct you after you’ve told me and anyone else who’ll listen your version of how the story goes…

“We are supposed to have fingers in so any exciting pies, we could easily have an update once a month on what each project has achieved in that period but do we ?”

Multiple updates on various projects through February, March, April, May, June & July.

So in short, the answer to your question: Yes.

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/

My mask has slipped? - Weird comment to be honest.

Apologies for having a bit of fun with it Jez, I spend a reasonable amount of time on a daily basis researching, fact checking and providing information which is verifiable by the reader (as I tend to provide context/references) which shows the absolute nonsense that is posted here for what it is.

I have a much less serious side to me that is usually reserved for social engagements and kept away from adult matters such as investing, but since you are the company you keep I thought I’d be less serious for once.

So for clarity, you’re allowed to post daft things but I’m not?

I swear that’s where this discussion started…