Member Info for JDAU

Once again Jez, you’re demonstrating very clearly that when facts are presented that prove the negative rhetoric to be unsubstantiated, you resort to personal attacks to attempt to discredit the argument.

Again, and I’m losing track of how many times this has been said… Ad hominem is not a viable argument in a discussion.

So I’m a d’head and a weasel for posting excerpts from RNS’s in response to a question / challenge?

Ben literally posted this: “However, beyond assigning funds to production, can you please provide details via RNS of any progress that Xtract has made of going into production?”

So I responded.

Not sure I deserve you being that emotional and attacking towards me (once again) to be honest.

By the way Ben, there’s plenty of other info re operational progress in that report - I’ve linked it so I’m not just going to copy and paste the whole RNS - unless you plan to continue denying any progress has been made, in which case, I’ll just show the evidence.

So yes, to reiterate my previous statement, XTR are clearly on the cusp of production at Silver King and in Morocco (pending gov approval).

Regarding Silver King: “Sufficient drill data has been generated during the Phase 1 drilling to allow for an initial non-code compliant estimation of mineral resources at Silverking to direct internal mine planning.”

Regarding Morocco: “The parties anticipate that the collaboration could rapidly progress towards small scale mining. Any small-scale mining operation developed will utilise Wildstone's own contractors, and the capital funding for the operation of US$200,000 will be provided by Xtract, who will be allowed to recover the initial capital by being paid 75% of free cashflow. Xtract shall be responsible for all small-scale development funding until such time as the operation is demonstrating a surplus income over expenditures (including sustaining and maintenance capital). On full capital repayment, Xtract will be entitled to 60% of all profits.

The small-scale development will continue during the exploration phase and will be replaced or may run concurrently if the potential for a larger more sophisticated processing plant is identified (larger scale development).”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/half-year-report-i9cu219e4y9ou39.html

We received that information via RNS (amongst other updates on various projects) at the end of September.

We then received the following information via RNS alongside the fundraise in November.

“Executive Chairman Colin Bird commented: "This fundraising has been initiated in order to enable us to continue to develop our mine project in Morocco and invest in our joint venture with our partners in Silverking in Zambia and in particular, to complete construction of a processing plant at Silverking whilst continuing with exploration on the general licence area. The Board expects that the Silverking plant will be commissioned and mining start in 2026 to take advantage of current copper prices. In Morrocco, exploration will continue while Government approval is obtained to redevelop the Amghas mine and construct a floatation plant."

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/fundraising-for-1632000000-r13pf1l7vjv9fpn.html

Now I’m not trying to be patronising here, but surely you can put two and two together?

Mines don’t just get built on a whim, it takes work, work that XTR have been doing and informing the market of via RNS so it seems odd to me that you would just outright deny that they’ve been progressing towards production.

I’m naturally cynical and calling it as I see it Jezzoo..

Metals prices are flying.

We are clearly on the cusp of production at both Silver King & In Morroco (pending gov approval) as is detailed in RNS’s / podcasts.

There are large buys coming through at a time where the bb is littered with a very obvious anti XTR/CB agenda.

So just for clarity, I’m “keeping the arguments going” by not allowing a dominant negative rhetoric here… and of course none of you are doing anything wrong by constantly talking smack about XTR & CB?

Silver up circa 9% today - looking good.

Rising metals prices + near term production across multiple projects (as per RNS’s) wouldn’t have anything to do with having so many posters bending over backwards to talk this share down at the moment… would it?

Interesting to see sizeable buys going through whilst the doom and gloom posters try their hardest to shout negatives from the rooftops.

Probably a coincidence though… no-one would ever play dirty when moneys involved, right?

Offering my condolences, for what it’s worth Jez.

Out of interest, what club / who was the wake for?

It’s always tough to lose a friend and/or colleague, regardless of the circumstance, so, putting our differences aside, offering my sympathies.

As an aside, I find it quite comical that Jezzoo, my mate, would announce to the group that he has to disappear “to go for lunch” when the back and forth was clearly showing that he was in the wrong about our discussion and now suddenly, after Jez logs off, there’s several different seldom seen bb alias’s logging in to jump to his defence and trying to stop me from posting.

Probably just coincidental timing though, right?

Like I said, be healthily cynical of everything.

Thanks for taking a stab at me 9 minutes after another poster suggested perhaps I should ease off. Really proving my point about me often posting in response to being needled.

No Gix, personally speaking, I’m just trying to convince anyone reading the bb to not take the absolute trash written here posing as fact, as factual.

As I’ve said before do your own research. Read the RNS’s. Listen to the podcasts. Read what people have to say. Make up your own mind on how convincing a post is. Be healthily cynical of everything.

Investing is a personal financial decision to make. Ignore the emotive hyperbole designed to get you to sell or buy shares to benefit someone else’s agenda.

FYI - most people on the spectrum don’t need meds - thanks for bringing what should be a mature discussion all the way full circle to a personal attack on me again though.

Ps. Laughable that you’d suggest me posting factual information about the company or indeed offering a friendly warning on the legality of falsifying an RNS (even though it was clearly a joke) constitutes “disrupting the board”.

I should probably just leave everyone to say whatever they want unchallenged though, right?

“from the giddy heights of your high horse you assumed I was talking about Howezaps post”

Jez, you get annoyed about me suggesting you’re not the best at reading / interpreting information and once again, you demonstrate that you clearly have not fully read/comprehended what was said, c’mon mate, what do you expect me to say?

You’re getting angry about my post when you’ve clearly not understood it even though it is clearly written:

“If you don’t believe anything you read then what’s the point of reading anything or indeed having regulated news?”

What’s the point of reading anything (like what you are discussing) OR indeed having regulated news (comparing your discussion about reading news to reading regulated news).

Notice the OR?

So as it turns out, I didn’t assume you were talking about howezaps post, that should be pretty clear from what I wrote.

In my next post, (because you immediately snapped at me and told me to get back in my box) I then offered clarity: “I was simply tying together what you were talking about with something relevant to investing in the stock market - being that we’re on a company bb on a website tied to the stock market.”

and you’re still acting like I spoke out of turn or misinterpreted what you had said.

Do you ever admit that you’re wrong? Or am I just the villain of your story regardless of me posting something completely reasonable.

My post is completely reasonable and I stand by it.

Bluntly, if you wish to have a private conversation - don’t post your view on a public forum where obviously you are opening it up for debate and/or comments.

You are overreacting.

You literally said verbatim “It just shows you can't believe anything you read nowadays Ben”

I was simply tying together what you were talking about with something relevant to investing in the stock market - being that we’re on a company bb on a website tied to the stock market. Not exactly a stretch.

My point is that to say you can’t believe *anything* doesn’t make any sense as there are plenty of verified channels of information - such as an RNS - because the information contained is held to a legal standard.

Agreed that a lot of information shouldn’t be taken as gospel though.

“ just shows you can't believe anything you read nowadays Ben” - I think you mean ‘everything you read’ Jez.

If you don’t believe anything you read then what’s the point of reading anything or indeed having regulated news?

RNS announcements are an official mechanism for public companies to comply with regulatory disclosure requirements, and their integrity is crucial for market stability and investor confidence.

I’d argue that not believing most of the rubbish posted on a bb is a good start, focus on the facts - and let the RNS’s do the talking.

Appreciate this is mainly a joke howezap but just an fyi as I feel you’re playing with fire.. Faking a Regulatory News Service (RNS) release is illegal and constitutes a serious criminal offense, primarily market manipulation and fraud.

Please keep in mind this is a public forum on a company bulletin board on a website very much tied to the stock market.

Again, appreciate that post is written with a reasonable level of playfulness but to title a post “RNS out” and then write a post that mimics the style of an RNS is, at least in my view, risky.

Attempting to single out a character trait and mock someone for it is hateful and discriminatory. It was a deliberate attempt at humour that backfired and made you look like an ignorant man who thinks it’s ok to try and bully people.

The hilarious part is that you were clearly inferring that being on the spectrum would somehow inhibit me in because you clearly don’t understand how the autistic mind works and the advantages that it actually brings to the table regarding data analysis, working with numbers, remembering facts, hyperfocus etc.

For the record, you can quite obviously infer that something is an issue without stating the derogatory part explicitly. I may not always have the best grips of social dynamics but I’m not socially blind.

You don’t get to weasel your way out of what you said on a technicality when it was patently obvious what you were doing.

A ‘hissy fit’ - or, if you don’t just brush over the issue as though its not one, you’d see it is clearly a discussion about how a posters behaviour was completely out of line.

As I said nearly an hour ago, I’ve said my piece, so has Jezzoo, the reader can decide who’s in the right / wrong.

In fairness, as per my last few posts, I bite back when bitten, if I wasn’t being needled then I wouldn’t have any need to respond.

I genuinely don’t get it, you don’t like me posting or responding to you, yet you bait me into doing so.

Strange.

You wouldn’t be trying to spam a few posts so you could cover up your hate speech directed at someone for being neurodivergent, would you?

Presumably in this scenario, you’re the nutter on the bus hurling abuse at the academic just trying to get to work.