Member Info for JDAU

No Jez, I just hate liars.

I also find it comical when it’s as easy as it often is round here to expose them for what they are - just by using evidence.

Not sure what you’re rambling about to be honest Jez, you seem to be mistaken thinking I’d be angry about anything that has happened on the bb recently.

You realised you just saying I’m angry doesn’t make it the case, right?

I find it incredibly comical that a poster I repeatedly take issue with here has been caught up in their own web of lies when attempting to manipulate and assert themselves as a voice of authority on the bb.

This is all happening whilst my portfolio is absolutely flying.

Why would I be annoyed?

Not sure why several of you seem to have a problem with me exposing Andrew4444 for what he posted yesterday vs what he did at the time - you seem to be taking issue with me exposing a poster for trying to be manipulative.

There was a blatant dig by Andrew4444 at posters for misleading others / ‘ramping’ around the time of BR when it turns out that was precisely what they were doing. That is blatantly the case.

Seems a little strange that me pointing that out - with evidence - has some of you so riled up to be honest.

Ps.

Only used 362 words instead of 500 Gix - I did my best to condense and saved you nearly 30% reading time in order to reach the same conclusion - that Andrew4444 is full of…

Pps.

Far from ‘having a conniption over that one’ - this whole back and forth has tickled me in a way that I wasn’t sure some of you ever could. (Though admittedly I’ve done a lot of the heavy lifting…)

Genuine comedy gold.

Yes Andrew, I’ve read everything you’ve written - that is the problem.

Did you read what I’ve written? Let me remind you…

Andrew4444 posting today 08/06/26: “Alternatively, when the share price was very high during BR days, I hope some arnt kicking themselves now for buying more because the constant ramping on this board was suggesting the share price would go even higher.....before the big fall.

Just saying”

Also Andrew444 at ‘a point where the SP was very high during BR days’:

09/12/21: “a circa £500M increase is quite possible and IF that happened then a sp of 50p appears reasonable.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/andrew4444/?page=74

10/03/22: “If we did get $500M offer by October that would equate to 37.5p offer. I would also be happy with that.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/andrew4444/?page=69

02/04/22: “Add in a conservative 5p from African assets then 40p does not look unrealistic.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/andrew4444/?page=68

Arguably Andrew, (and I remember challenging you on your calculations / assumptions at the time) you were part of the “constant ramping on this board” and you were very much “suggesting the share price would go even higher.....before the big fall.”

‘I hope some arnt kicking themselves now for buying more’ based on your posts at the time.

Just saying.

As an aside, I couldn’t give a monkeys about how you choose to justify youself after being caught out - waffle all you like about why you did it at the time and how I’m definitely in the wrong - at the end of the day what you posted today about other people ramping was utter nonsense and turns out, regardless of you justifying it now, that was exactly what you were doing at the time.

You can twist and turn all you like but you have been irrefutably and obviously caught out for peddling a false narrative in order to try and make yourself an authority figure whilst discrediting others.

That’s a downright dirty play and you got caught.

I’m not sure how me categorically stating something that is the case can be called “inverted logic” but good luck convincing readers you’re always in the right and posting truthfully after being caught out with such a howler.

Ahh yes, what a surprise, even though I’ve offered up irrefutable evidence that proves you’re in the wrong… as usual, I am wrong and you are right.

Waffle as much as you like Andrew, my post clearly caught you out with evidence to prove you are posting rubbish and yet still somehow ‘I’m the issue’ here.

Seems legitimate…

Maybe you should go back to ‘filtering me’ and shout it from the rooftops in a weak attempt to get others to do the same - maybe then (you can hope) readers won’t see the evidence I post that proves you (and others) are full of it.

I’m done for the day, I can’t be bothered having a discussion with anyone when irrefutable evidence is refuted…

Shame that once again this bb has fallen into a stupid argument when bluntly, I started the day providing links & references in an attempt to answer questions posted here.

Apparently everything I do or say is wrong, even when I’m right. Go figure.

Feel free to lay on the insults now in an attempt to discredit me, as is ‘the gang’s’ usual tactic.

You’re correct Jez, few would put in the research or provide verifiable evidence to back up a statement they made in a post.

I choose to. Regularly.

But for the record, i didn’t exactly have to read through all of Andrew’s posts, I just had to find the SP high point re BR and then find the corresponding dates in Andrew’s post history - it was pretty easy to do. (As if me looking through Andrew’s posts is the problem, not what they posted that I took issue with?!?!)

I knew Andrew4444 was trying to position themselves as an authority figure (once again) by posting porkies today and bluntly misrepresenting what happened (surprise surprise), even to the point of acting like other people were guilty of ‘ramping’ when that is categorically what Andrew was doing at the time..

I remembered him being a key player in the wildly speculative valuations that were being thrown about at the time, namely because I remembered challenging the evidence - or lack thereof - at the time that was used to create said valuations.

As per my usual, neurodiverse self, I just wanted to provide the evidence / reference points so people could see for themselves who is in the right/wrong.

Once again, a bb poster I take issue with has been caught out posting false narratives…. once again you appear to take an issue with me proving it… strange, don’t you think?

So ask yourself, why am I (once again) the problem for calling it out?

#Gaslighting

#Awkard

#CaughtOut

You’re right though, my research and ability to use evidence to prove some of you are posting absolute rubbish really is the problem.

Comedy gold.

Andrew4444: “Alternatively, when the share price was very high during BR days, I hope some arnt kicking themselves now for buying more because the constant ramping on this board was suggesting the share price would go even higher.....before the big fall.

Just saying”

Also Andrew444 at ‘a point where the SP was very high during BR days’:

09/12/21: “a circa £500M increase is quite possible and IF that happened then a sp of 50p appears reasonable.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/andrew4444/?page=74

10/03/22: “If we did get $500M offer by October that would equate to 37.5p offer. I would also be happy with that.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/andrew4444/?page=69

02/04/22: “Add in a conservative 5p from African assets then 40p does not look unrealistic.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/andrew4444/?page=68

Arguably Andrew, (and I remember challenging you on your calculations / assumptions at the time) you were part of the “constant ramping on this board” and you were very much “suggesting the share price would go even higher.....before the big fall.”

‘I hope some arnt kicking themselves now for buying more’ based on your posts at the time.

Just saying.

Ahh yes Andrew, of course, everyone should filter me so ‘the group’ can post whatever negative views they want about the company and its projects unchallenged.

Best avoid my “inverted logic” where I provide links and references so readers can confirm or deny statements (posing as facts) posted on the bb with their own eyes.

The reader would be far better off just taking what’s posted by anonymous bb members as gospel, even when said posters are repetitively proven to be misrepresenting company comms.

Seems legit.

Ok Jez.

Since you’re so intent on being perfectly reasonable, as always, let’s leave it there then.

At least we’re in agreement that a day finished around 1.3pps is a good thing.

In fairness Jez, I didn’t have much more to say on the subject until you tried (and failed) to throw me under the bus by accusing me of using an ad hominem argument, when I didn’t.

Forgive me for writing a long post that clearly demonstrates you are wrong - but typically I don’t like to be attacked without defending myself.

For the record Jez, since you seemingly won’t let this go and we’re left arguing semantics…

My statement: “I’d suggest it’s rather closed minded and incredibly short sighted to write off an asset/project we own…”

That is not ad hominem.

Look at the sentence structure, I very clearly state that the action of writing off a project is closed minded and short sighted. (How else would you describe it?!)

Note how I attack the argument, not the person.

I then backed up my statement with evidence/reference points and have offered (in my opinion) solid reasoning for my view.

…and yes Jez, if you keep up the discussion with a view of making me look like an idiot when bluntly I’m being perfectly reasonable, I will likely continue to respond.

In fairness Jez, had Ben not been asserting that the project was definitely written off / dead in the water whilst clearly ignoring all other possible outcomes - I wouldn’t have used the terms closed minded or short sighted.

I don’t have much more to say on the subject and I’m not interested in being drawn into another stupid argument with you.

Best I can offer at this point in time:

“ Dump Material, Zambian Copperbelt

On the 6 February 2025, Xtract announced an agreement to purchase dump material from several sites situated in the Zambian Copperbelt, for a consideration of US$300,000 to be funded from existing cash resources. It is the intention to conduct trial test work and evaluation of the material that is valued at US$1.15 per tonne and will be recovered from the sellers' sites in Zambia by Xtract. The seller remains liable for and shall pay any statutory royalties or any other duties or charges due to the relevant authorities on the sale of any material to Xtract.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/half-year-report-i9cu219e4y9ou39.html

Stating someone is being ‘closed minded’ and ‘short sighted’ because they are either refusing to entertain a possible outcome (closed minded) or indeed they have not considered a possible outcome yet are still just writing off a project (short sighted) is not an insult Jez.

Ben can you seriously not get your head around how Kakuyu has the potential to be a part of a regional play being developed at Silver King?

The Kakuyu JV is also with oval, plenty of work has been done on the project, the intention was to use the processing facility at Kabwe - “A 250t bulk sample has been delivered to the Kabwe Refinery for drying, crushing and sampling ahead of negotiations for the future processing of ore production”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/kakuyu-copper-project-zambia-update-gxhcqg4fm8fgumv.html

Now look again at the map I posted: https://xtractresources.com/projects-operations/silverking-copper-project/

You can see Kabwe in the top right, now consider Kakuyu’s proximity to Silver King and the transport savings that could be made using a more local facility (if applicable) to process the material.

You still not able to see a possible strategy developing here…?

I’m not saying it’s nailed on, I’m saying don’t write it off.

I was answering a question about when the last update was on a project and providing useful information regarding the location of the project being discussed.

There’s an adult discussion going on here Jez, why are you insulting me and trying to draw me into a stupid argument?

I stand by my statement, to write off a project which is in close proximity to another project we own (where there could be crossover in terms of plant usage) is closed minded and short sighted.

Last update on Kakuyu was this:

“Kakuyu Cu-Co Project, Mumbwa Province, Zambia

The Kakuyu project is located approximately 53km north-west of the town of Mumbwa, in the Central Province of Zambia. The project comprises a small-scale mining licence that is inclusive of the small historic Kakuyu open pit, and an adjacent exploration licence. The Kakuyu open pit was subject to a small-scale mining operation prior to acquisition, and the region is well-known for mining, including the nearby mines and occurrences of Sable Antelope, True Blue, Crystal Jacket, Maurice F Gifford, Lou Lou, Silverking and Kamiyobo. The most recent discovery is the Iron Oxide Copper Gold ("IOCG") Kitumba deposit.

Work continues to define the potential for a future open pit mining operation, as well as assess the wider licence area for concentrations of additional mineralisation.”

Ref: https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/XTR/half-year-report-i9cu219e4y9ou39.html

I’d suggest it’s rather closed minded and incredibly short sighted to write off an asset/project we own…

Regarding Kakuyu, if you look just below the introduction to the Silver king project on XTR’s ‘operations’ part of the website, there is a map which demonstrates their respective locations titled “Location of the Silverking Cu-Ag mine and prospecting licence 26673-HQ-LEL”

Reference: https://xtractresources.com/projects-operations/silverking-copper-project/