Member Info for JDAU

I see the obvious attempt at humour flew over your head then Jez.

FYI I’m far from perfect, flawed in multiple ways, like not being able to let something go when I know it’s incorrect.

At the end of the day I just believe that if you’re discussing anything, accuracy and sticking to fact is not optional, it is mandatory.

Ben, even though I have better things to do than entertain a conversation we’ve had several times already, I’ll answer you as best I can:

“Why do you think the majority of shareholders are disgruntled on here?” - personally I don’t believe half of the posters here are shareholders, I feel there are several posters intent on misrepresenting or even just straight up lying about the company in order to effectively manipulate sentiment as I’ve already stated.

“Why are you and Howezap the only ones to defend CB's Comms?” - I can’t answer that for Howezap, personally I defend CB’s comms because generally speaking I see them as being indicative of what’s going on at the company I own a part of, I also see RNS’s that again, generally follow in line from what we’re told via interviews.

Do you think you are the only one to understand the process?

- no, but when I’m told ‘2+2=4’ by the company with supporting plans/evidence, and then I’m told ‘2+2= -7.5’ by a poster with zero supporting evidence, I’m inclined to believe that said poster either doesn’t understand or is intentionally being misleading with their posts.

Are we all intellectually inferior and simply can't cut through the mist and see the plan?

- again, no, but when the facts (eg operational progress) are laid out in front of all of us, it is simply unacceptable that someone would act like those facts are not in the public domain and instead try to craft their own rhetoric that is blatantly bs.

Hope that broadly answers your questions Ben, and I’m sorry if that post is too long for you Jez.

I know this is pedantic but I actually can’t help myself, why would you state “I will ask one final question though.” and then ask several different questions? That’s just annoying.

Sometimes you “normies” don’t use language properly and it’s incredibly frustrating.

Counter question Ben: “if you do not trust the company to deliver the objectives set out in RNS’s and do not trust the clear communication they put out via interviews (because in your own words it is ‘paid propaganda’ and shouldn’t be trusted), why would you be or remain invested here?

It would make a lot more sense to sell (even if it’s) at a loss, offset the loss against gains elsewhere, invest somewhere you do trust to deliver.

It makes zero sense to begrudgingly remain invested in a company you do not trust to deliver.

Understandably you don’t like being proven to be talking nonsense when you’re trying to position yourself as an expert on all things XTR, but does that really mean that even when you get blatantly caught out you can’t even be humble enough to say “oh yeah, given the evidence that’s been put in front of me I can see that I was in fact wrong in stating X”?

I won’t hold out any hope of it considering that after all the insults you’ve hurled at me and the several times you’ve been caught out peddling bs - you have not once apologised or admitted any kind of fault.

You just insult, vanish and then come back peddling the same repetitive negative rubbish another day don’t you.

You realise that much like my issue with Microcap, it is crystal clear to anyone reading this that what you have stated in your post and what was actually said is not the same?

Like I’ve said before, you simply don’t know me very well if you think it’d stress me out using facts / data and finding the evidence to correct people when they are talking nonsense about something I know about.

Presumably you understand that non-neurotypical’s sometimes have special interests and quite enjoy studying and then recalling data, facts & figures - especially when someone else is demonstrating a lack of knowledge but a level of engagement about the subject.

I’m pretty relaxed and actually finding you proving my point quite funny, i’m not exactly up tight Jez. You’re doing such a great job of highlighting exactly what I’ve been pointing out the last couple of days - why would I be annoyed by that?

The structure of you(and several other dubious posters) is obvious and repetitive:

Post absolute bs. Get corrected. Argue. Get proven wrong. Insult because you were posting nonsense and can’t evidence what you say so you attempt to discredit the person arguing against you. Refuse to accept that attacking the person instead of the point is a flawed argument. Insult some more. Repeat.

You’re now acting like it’s not an issue that you’ve stated something as fact that is categorically incorrect… and somehow I’m the person who’s in the wrong for correcting you.

Go figure.

“As they say at the start of every one. " don't take anything said in these podcasts as the truth.” - Except that’s not at all what they state at the start of each podcast episode is it Jez.

Verbatim, this is what is stated:

“Nothing in this podcast is intended as investment advice

and the people in this podcast may hold

positions in the stocks they talk about.

Do not buy any investment based solely on a tip or recommendation. Please do your own research.”

This is exactly my problem with you and your bunch Jez, you play it fast and loose with the truth, you bend words or change things to suit your narrative.

You have literally just demonstrated exactly what I’m talking about whilst trying to argue that’s not what you do.

I genuinely don’t understand how you think you can remain credible whilst writing posts that are so easily proved as not being factual.

So yes, in a nutshell, that’s exactly what I’m saying: your posts are often BS and this exact conversation is proof of that.

Jez, I tend to appear whenever you post, because you typically you post absolute trash that requires challenging.

As I’ve said before, I rely on well structured argument and evidence to back up what I post.

You seem to rely on people not investigating things for themselves and using a ‘herd mentality’ to push an inaccurate narrative.

Still, your upticks “definitely” prove that whatever you say, regardless of it being fact or fiction, and regardless of the evidence that might count against you, is unquestionably correct.

“Tin foil hat”, “lost the plot”, “hasn’t taken his meds” etc.

I’ve heard it all before, but feel free to crack on with the standard response of insults from yourself and multiple other accounts.

NB. Interesting trades today aren’t they: https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareTrades.html?shareprice=XTR&share=Xtract

Ahhh, so it’s just a coincidence that several of the posters I take issue with all appear at the same time posting repetitive negative rhetoric not based on fact whilst large buys go through at bargain prices.

…And then a different group of posters appear - clearly after shares have been accumulated - posting repetitive positive rhetoric also not based on fact whilst large sells go through at inflated prices.

Meanwhile some of the familiar faces - such as yourself - play the part of a disgruntled shareholder who is able to flip flop as they please because they use ‘likes’ and ‘number of people who agree’ to back them up regardless of what they say or which side of the coin they are currently on.

Hmm, must be a complete coincidence and definitely isn’t anything to do with an organised group attempting to manipulate sentiment and subsequently share price.

You’ve called me Autistic before as an attempt at an insult Jez, but as I said at the time: comically, you do not seem to understand the benefits that might provide a person regarding working with numbers (i.e investing) and importantly pattern recognition (i.e seeing who’s full of it).

Like you’ve said, multiple times now: you’re definitely not the same person with multiple usernames and you definitely don’t know any of them personally. It is all just a coincidence. Probably.

Guess we’ll have to take your word for it.

Microcap, a couple of days ago you straight up lied about what was said in the roast interview, not a little fib, not a misunderstanding, but a calculated and fabricated lie.

“…Colin has chosen a podcast and not an RNS and has now pushed timelines out to the end of the year?”

Reference: https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/microcap1/

What you stated categorically did not happen, the interview is up for anyone to listen to and I’ve linked it multiple times.

I have no interest in continuing a discussion with you about the difference between ‘news’ and ‘regulated news’, you are a liar, you have been caught red handed doing exactly what I keep going on about with regards to a group pushing a negative agenda that is not reflective of the truth.

I do not believe you are interested in or capable of having an adult discussion in good faith with any kind of integrity, hence, I won’t be giving you the time of day.

I’m sorry if me stating facts and clearly showing my sources offends you and your cronies - but I’m not going anywhere.

I’m not going to be bullied off the bb of a company I own a significant chunk of because a bunch of posters with a clear, collective, negative agenda choose to gang up on me.

Issue you’re going to have Jez, is that my posts actually have evidence that readers can assess themselves.

On the other hand most of you and your lots posts are mindless, repetitive rhetoric without evidence to back it up.

You rely on the spaces in between RNS releases to be able to craft your own negative rhetoric and bluntly you encourage readers to ignore actual releases (such as interviews) from the company in lieu of believing the utter BS that is written on this bb.

When challenged you resort to insults because you can’t construct believable or importantly, verifiable arguments.

It’s pretty transparent to be honest.

Microcap, what would you call a podcast interview that provides new information on operational progress?

I’d call that ‘news’.

Jezzoo, i don’t feel like you understand the word hindsight.

It wasn’t hindsight last time I stated BEFORE the RNS came out that we had been told via interview what to expect in the following RNS. That then came to fruition.

It’s also not hindsight that once again, BEFORE the next RNS has come out I’m here telling you what to expect in the next RNS because we have had that information clearly communicated by the company via an interview.

You really are just wilfully trying to ignore any of the available information.

Ben, with each news release you keep offering the same daft recycled criticism you don’t seem to be able to drop, even though you’ve been proven wrong multiple times. You stated a similar level of doubt re operations given in previous verbal updates via interview. The RNS then landed and you were proven to be completely wrong as the company update matched what they had said in the interviews.

Again, as per last time, the company have been very clear via RNS about what the intention for the near term is, the company have then put out multiple interviews in between RNS’s offering a “fleshing out” of what’s happening and effectively are giving an intermediate update prior to (as per the interview) updating the market with a full picture via RNS again.

You keep doubting the progress commicated via interview because it’s not being written in an RNS and then the RNS lands and proves the company have been being clear all along and you’ve been talking out of your …

You can choose not to believe it, but outwardly denying it’s happening is why I take issue with you.

…and as if by magic, another one turns up.

In fairness, there are several posters, including yourself Ben - who “are definitely shareholders” - that seem to be relentlessly negative about the company, even to the point of denying blatant progress communicated via RNS/interviews that will ultimately result in cash generation.

Seems a little odd, no?

Interview at around 59 minutes: “Silver king is on the fourth blast, we’ve already got down to the oxides, we’ll probably sell those oxides to a nearby plant. Our own plant is ready, we finished the tailings dams last week, we’re connected to the external power, we’ve put in place a bigger crusher and we’ve got a ball mill we’re going to put in and an additional ball mill as well. So I’m quite excited about silver king starting off as a modest project around 3, 3.5 thousand tonnes of copper…”

Reference: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=YC4R8VbMkEs&t=3420s&pp=0gcJCQQLAYcqIYzv&ra=m

Wow such unique and refreshing ideas this morning that haven’t been posted 800 times already and are “definitely not an negative agenda” or pushing any kind of negative rhetoric at a point where production news is imminent.

Thanks guys, ‘great contribution’.

Interesting that I’d choose to use Latin to establish the basic (widely recognised) ground rules of debating and you’d use it to attempt to insult me (again). It’s a shame you don’t understand anything other than obscenities In such a beautiful language, we probably wouldn’t argue so much if you did.

So I guess you’ll get a 10/10 being creative on that one but a measly 1/10 for using the same ol’ script.

It’s boring, it’s repetitive and at this point you’re coming across as someone who is so dim witted they can only think to swear at someone in frustration when they’re losing an argument.

N.b . It’s hilariously pathetic that you actually thought you were being clever and ‘scoring a point’ by swearing at me in Latin.

“Good post Ben.( not an alias on mine or me an alias of Ben for that matter)”

Why would you even write that, you’re like a child with icing round their mouth telling me - when I didn’t ask - that they definitely didn’t eat the cake.

Who do you think you’re fooling?

I guess a bit like you said yesterday Jez, what makes you think - considering how you choose to speak to me and how little I respect you - that I would listen to anything you have to say or let you order me around?

I’m done with talking to you and your blatant multi accounts that “definitely aren’t multi accounts” - good of you to clear that up for us though, it’s really put my mind at ease now you’ve told me unequivocally that I don’t need to worry and that you’re definitely not using multiple accounts.

Guess I’ll just have to take you at your word… silly not to when you’ve always been so honest - eh?

You should probably try to use yet another account to act like it’s on your side and like I’m being the unreasonable one… maybe that’d help make the complete BS you post seem more reasonable?

Oh, maybe you could get a whole group together to talk amongst yourselves about how difficult and how much of a problem poster I am - maybe that would make my logic seem less logical? Or my truth seem less truthful?

Oh, don’t forget the insults … and if all else fails, make a massive song and dance about filtering me to try and encourage others to do the same?

Worth I shot I guess..