The latest Investing Matters Podcast with Jean Roche, Co-Manager of Schroder UK Mid Cap Investment Trust has just been released. Listen here.
One huge disadvantage of lithium batteries is their performance in the extreme cold, damages the electrolytes and doesn't charge properly affecting range even its ability to charge.
https://www.kansascity.com/news/nation-world/national/article284306808.html
H1 ist half. Tesla is becoming interested in sodium batteries. Ever thought why enhanced battery technology has more density. So others still exploring, DGI has an enhanced battery technology plus some other patents.
https://ts2.pl/en/teslas-exploration-into-sodium-ion-battery-technology/#gsc.tab=0
First of the cruise lines to put out an idea of renewable energy to power their ships will of course come from Norway. I think one of the directors used to cover Norway in their last job. I think they understand the necessity of reacquiring cheap shares early in the business. With the success of the prototype, surely there will be savings compared to using petroleum and ships will be built on this new technology.
https://www.cruisecritic.co.uk/articles/this-is-what-the-cruise-ship-of-the-future-could-look-like
Whatever is best to make the technology mainstream we must pursue otherwise we won't progress as fast as those whose products are in use and ours gets obsolete. If IPs are recognised internationally, then we must pursue a country where this is encouraged rather than be victims of cronyism or the wishes of short traders.
Stellantis invested in a sodium battery company which aims to start manufacturing next year 2025. Meanwhile they are welcome to make some orders from DGI just in case there isn't enough press on our sodium batteries yet.
Looks like before we can apply for NASDAQ AIM, we need our market cap to be around 101M USD which will be around 1p per share. If our friends should perhaps reacquire shares that it creates demands then perhaps we should get there. Getting in the NASDAQ main market requires proof of making revenues from the business and their are three levels. Each does not only require income but also given share prices maintained for 3 months. So perhaps the only way is to find more funding to buy back shares early in the game.
Even the improved lithium battery LFP expands on overcharging and spontaneously explodes on exposure to air. Aside from the modern slavery associated with lithium, I don't think insurance will cover anything caused by lithium batteries. I once rode a lithium powered MG of a friend with my family, I was always hoping to just have brought my car and drove. Like if many would be going solar in their homes because of batteries, I don't think it's lithium batteries they would install, insurance could possibly not allow such. Sodium will go mainstream and we're here early.
Startups they say would usually be prepared to lose £400k monthly. Imagine how long AMTE has been in such a situation. Where are they getting the funding? Some people don't want to be known to fund startups for several reasons. I'll give myself a break from commenting now. Good luck everyone.
Credible interest has been identified hence the reason for the extension of suspension. This must have been proven at length with careful examination of documents to prove that it is such. Pinnacle owner is a Harvard guy who resides in the US which is more supportive of these sorts of technology. They were partnered with big names like BP but there wasn't any support as to orders. Who is that referred to that has credible interest hopefully will save our interest as well.
Burn rate.
Looks like the company spends £120K weekly which is after all the revenues put in.
Sodium cars hasn't been in mass production yet so hopefully OEMs are in discussions.
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/stellantis-invest-french-sodium-ion-battery-maker-ev-output-2024-01-12/
Hopefully you're not one of those that scammed the company because we have reason to suspect fraud.
Density for sodium should be around the same for everyone unless there's additives included in the mix. Perhaps it's enough to cover 150 miles range to a full charge. The issue on recharging is this is where sodium has an advantage because lithium is prone to explode in those times it's on a charge. Anyway 150 miles should be enough for most, do a stopover then proceed.
Andy
Surely it must take a trained eye to spot such. If they can sue Tesla for manipulation surely WH owe us an explanation and loss of revenue. If you see it, there's an email address of anti fraud people. Perhaps let's discuss it here first if you want to enlighten us more. Thanks.
Tomorrow should make sense and all this drama is more likely a strategy so that M&A should take place. An administration would displace the BOD and likely they won't be allowed to hold similar posts for a certain time in years. I hope they have reacquired all loose shares as there's actually isn't much for funding infrastructure. Gigafactories can take 2-3 years to build and may take 1-2 years to develop full operations. But we have a mega factory plus the BIC. As Pinnacle has been long term investors in AMTE, if they are connected with Lithium factories in Saudi that these factories can easily be converted to sodium. Many countries are developing this technology so they won't be relying on countries that control the oil. So they will need safe and cheap batteries if there's any of such exist. So far I know lithium batteries have been banned in some school campus and even the trains. Only 250M shares for AMTE, hopefully it's the Pinnacle group that can rescue us. Poor DGI looks like the plague is there now. If they don't reacquire shares before fundraising, their business will be delayed.
A suspicion of fraud is enough for the government to investigate a phoenix company if this is what a fool should intend. But a foolish idea such as this shouldn't be thought of as most patents are named under these specialist battery makers hence the reason people invested in them.
The best thing with formal written communications is that although it was written by someone with a post-grad yet it must be explained in details as though writing to a primary schooler bound for grammar school. This should be so that in whatever time in the future and wherever in England, it can be read again and again that the same meaning has been intended. If a controversy can potentially arise in future, it's just better for them to follow the law early in the game.