Member Info for jakeandelwood

SMS get another 200000 UK smart meter order for Smets2 meters for SSE and made preferred supplier for them.

Tony. Like I said check my posts and read in context. JC had been sending out " inspiring" notes for years. I got rid of the few shares not long ago as I said, apologies I was unaware you couldn't post once you had sold out, then again you believe chat on here affects the share price.
If you really want to know why I continue to post on this and a few other boards, I was fortunate enough to be in that financial position where i could retire early. One of my hobbies amongst others happens to be shares. Around 80% are dividend paying blue chips ,two are smaller companies that share price wise I've done quite well from (that could of course change though.) It's all about a balanced risk portfolio.
I could well ask why you are so positively bias here??. One of my comments months back was that despite people being led to believe Omni was the only solution it was not. I think we now know that.
The comedy value is good here as well.

Ok so now I'm a liar LOL. I dumped most of mine pre consolidation as I could see what was coming and kept a few as a gamble most of which I sold soon after. The final few I dumped a few months back. Let me guess you got sucked in on the event spike. Hope CC isn't your only share.

Not sure what your relevance is to the FTSE...........mad as a bucket of frogs :)))))))

Tony it's noticable you only see what you want to read. I'm not sure how long you've been invested but if you want to comment on what you call my bias I suggest you read ALL my historical posts before commenting. There was a time when I was very supportive. That was until I started to see the way my investment was being seriously diluted based on no more than promises, if you like I woke up and smelt the coffee. Dilution has been the only consistent thing here.
Before you say it sour grapes as I have lost significantly, I am happy to disclose this debacle has cost me exactly £1037 loss on my investment since I've been here, small change of my whole portfolio.
What is poor is yourself posting strong buy on, IMOI a share that has consistently demonstrated to be anything like that.
My only conclusion us that you either work for the company,are paid to post or refuse to see the reality of a risk balanced investment plan and are massively underwater.
I once heard a saying "It costs to be stupid. The stupider you are, the more it costs." Based on my decisions with CC, i and one of two others on here appear to be on the lower end of the stupid scale.

Very long term holder, significant holding, never sold one share and don't intend too. The current situation reminds me of the planning meeting where permission was granted for the eventual build.
I well remember sitting in the garden istening to the planning meeting through a link someone kindly posted. The risk was I would lose the lot if Sxx didn't secure planning. Stuck with it then and will stick with it now. To quote Delboy........this time next year Rodders we will be millionaires!
Good luck to all LTHs, this project will make a massive difference to local families for years to come. You rarely have the opportunity to change a lot of people's lives for the better. That is why I invested in Sxx and for that it's worth the risk.

Not if Tony is to be believed, parts of London are not covered and need more towers. Feel sorry for any newbies once again sucked in here. One I've said many times read through historical RNSs to get an overall feel and DYOR.

52 week low today then. How long before the Ord 2p shares are trading at.....2p ?

RNS tomorrow then ??

Absolute nonsense Tony.

"You pick up an article, knowing full well that Arqiva is the Scotland contract and high light it against CC who are in the Southern contract and ignore the fact that CC is dealing with the 'notspot' problems and not the main installations"
The article clearly demonstrates there are ootions, I said this months ago.

"Again what infrastructure is in place, why do you think they have the 'notspots' problem and have made provision for it.
Again you ignore my point about Towers which in London etc would be resisted all the way."

How do you think the currently installed kit works without any infracture in place? Where in London can you not get a phone or Broadband signal? That should!d give you a clue about coverage.

"May be you could come back with more detailed coverage of Arqiva so far, how many the contract was for,how many they have achieved, what 'notspots' they have dealt with successfully or bypassed and move on."

Arqiva and others are already getting orders and have installations. According to yourself "notspots" contract is yet to be awarded hence the excuse for CC as yet not getting any income from these.

Finally it is rich coming from yourself in particular , to say I am essentially bias based upon nothing but the fact you have consistently been posting the polar opposite on a much more positive stance.Worse still you keep posting *Strong Buy".
Pot ,kettle ,black comes to mind.

Tony . Why when sharing information in the public domain is accurate am I knocking CC ? Lets be clear a lot if the infrastructure is already in place and you can fill the blanks installing in existing building structures. How do you think the mobile phone network operates. Early days it as called Cellnet because it wirjecby invidual cells be linked together.
On another point why is there such a lack of information coming from CC in the way if updates if things are so close? Other providers are putting out information.

Morning Tony. My main point was in my second post. There are options to Omnimesh as Arquiva have demostrated. They are already involved so unless it is Omnimesh in disguise ( which I very much doubt) one could come to the conclusion they are in the driving seat for the not spots ,if of course there are any.

Info share.
Arquiva looks like they use an optional solution to CC ,"Flexnet"

https://www.arqiva.com/overviews/smart-metering/flexnet/

So Smets1 will now work on the existing DCC softwate platform.Note "over the air " upgrade
https://www.smartdcc.co.uk/news-and-insights/news/update-on-smets1-enrolment-and-adoption/

It's called "The too difficult to deal with" box

So their all insider trading then??? If that is the case the FCA need to start taking a look.

There are processes in place ( or should be) to prevent the types of leaks SXX seems to be experiencing. One would be potentially defensible, more than one inexcusable.
We are not looking at a tuppence halfpenny company here, Head of Compliance frankly needs to have his ar5e chewed and be shown the door if that turns out to be the case.

No leak ? do me a favour, what happened yesterday then with all the sudden trading then ? Think this stinks ,hope not though.

If this is a leak the toothless FCA should be investigating. Didn't someone suggest there was a big fund selling a week or so back? Coincidence?
I've been in for as long as I can remember and now have an average below 17p so not hurting too much at the minute. Really do feel for those buying in above 38p though. Saw it drop from 40p to below 15p I think it was and stuck them in a drawer and forgot about them for a while. Same now I think. GLA.

Hi Colour just trying to make a point and demonstrate how ridiculous some of the statements are on here! Was going to post Strong Buy but had only had one glass if the Red Stuff! Lol

https://www.marketscreener.com/CYANCONNODE-HOLDINGS-PLC-4005691/financials/