We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
BradSmith. Thanks and glad to hear your recovery on HL. I may try what you described with say half of my HL shares to reduce any risk.
Regards: Jaffjoon
Dear oh dear, reading some of the recent posts makes me understand why the sensible, knowledgeable, informative and selfless contributers interested in SNG .. eventually leave this chat board.. But since the insults are relentless and continue regardless of the SP, I can only conclude that they are deliberatly done to either alianate posters here or to hide relevant important information towards the previous pages as soon as possible. If this is the case, then I cannot see how these offenders can be investors, except if they are shorters since they are disrupting this board by flooding the board with messages to damaging it.
I really did not want to highlight this behaviour here and in writing, but its has started to bother me and I know that it will continue regardless. So I too am considering leaving this chat site. Except if anyone can convince me otherwise. So, please lets be constructive and exchange info and views as we should for our benefit. I know lockdown is difficult and is effecting us all in different ways, but please, lets not get upset or abusive to one another, it will only fester in our minds and honestly its not good for mental health.
I am not doing this because I`m board or want a reply. I`m doing it for you.
Apologies for the spelling errors. Good night
Regards: Jaffjoon
Bradsmith: Many thanks once again for your detailed info below. You will be pleased to know that I have actually just printed it to use when my memory fades !
As for HL`s sp, I have every confidence in good value for the future and use my own experience as an example since in the past 10 months (I am a HL customer) my quantity of trades has increased by a multiple of 400% !! . I also believe there was an indication of increased trades on one of the HL reports. I think their reported revenue may end up as an all time high (certainly for little old me anyway.) So in the abscence of other stable shares, I certainly think the future looks good for HL. So lets hope for a sp of +£20 shortly.
Okay I found the info on Regeneron`s site as follows. Makes interesting reading.
https://newsroom.regeneron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/regeneron-reports-positive-interim-data-regen-covtm-antibody
Bradsmith: Many thanks for the explanation of those "UNKOWN" trades that occasionally appear.
I always do appreciate informed responses.
I have also, on several occasions, noticed that a "buy" I made appeared as a "sell". I`m 100% sure of this since I was in a unique position to monitor my own deals. It is still a mystery why that happened, although it was several years ago.
What are your thoughts on the up coming results and how we may fare ?
Regards: Jaffjoon
Anyone else intending to listen in on the presentation by PHC this afternoon ?
No wonder the sp is dropping. The penny for PI`s has finally dropped since those not holding shares in an ISA or SIPP are taxed on dividends so for no reason at all they are now faced with an unnecessary tax bill. Where as if TSCO had simply called it "Capital Return" and NOT dividend , it would not be taxed. Shame , but there you are.
Thanks "Oxford 12". Your input and information is appreciated by many. This is a fast moving chat site , so sometimes posts do not get read in time with so much going on. So I thought I would let you know, its not that others do not care, its because they don`t get a chance to see some posts especially since they are posted "for our benefit".
So thank you on behalf of all of us.
Regards: Jaffjoon
Sounds good to me and could be a competitor.
On a related subject: I have been snifin & inhalin (Pretty P talk..) drugs for at least a year now, especially on outin`s and for some odd reason I come back home with loads of free stuff.
I`m all for it.
Just a bit of humor.. Regards and night night Jaffjoon
I`m not medically qualified.
It seems the whole purpose of the SNG treatment is that it can keep people "at home" and not over-run the NHS. Lets look at the one and only constant message that we have heard for a year, namely: "Save the NHS". What does this mean ? They are trying to convey a message to the public and it seems it is:
"If the NHS is over-run by COVID patients, it will be unable to treat anyone else"
In addition there is also an underlying message namely:
" Gathering quantities of COVID patients INDOORS is the worst thing you can do in increasing the spread of the disease since it is also airborne and spreads like wildfire specially since you need many nurses, doctors, other staff to provide care and all their health also becomes a high risk factor in a busy indoor environment no matter how many precautions you take"
So assuming all the above is correct, the best solution is to try to find a "Home Treatment" and hence the interest in SNG type treatments.
So lets not loose our focus on the important issues: "Yes... do Save the NHS and try to keep & treat the infected AT HOME"
Regards: Jaffjoon
Yes, I caught that too, towards the end of the presentation in the questions section. Sounded very promising but we must not criticize since generally its the managers of scientific people who should be able to multi task, and since every one is so focused on Vaccine, Vaccine , Vaccine there is no brain space left to absorb new / parallel solutions. It will come into the media but perhaps not as instantly as we wish right now. Patience
Alexas: Thanks for the link.
I`m trying to find out the number of known competitors to our SNG001 Interferon Beta-1a inhaled product. Can anyone document them here with details of how far down the line they are with their products. I know the anwear should be "do your own research" but my medical knowledge is extreemly limited.
1/ Betterlife Pharma (BETR): According to the article forwarded by Alexas. It seems they are
working on a very similar inhaled Interferon product which I assume they have a patent for !
........ any other competitors ? .... anybody ?
Thanks in advance. Jaffjoon
Its now available in printed form on www.whitehouse.com and section 1 2 and 2a state the following:
Section 1. Policy. It is the policy of the administration to improve the capacity of the Nation`s healthcare to address coronovirus disease 2019 (COVI-19), to accelerate the development of novel therapies to treat COVID -19, and to improve all Americans access to quality and affordable healthcare.
Section 2. Accelerating the development of Novel Therapies. To enhance the Nations ability to quickly develop the most promising COVID-19 interventions..........
(a) Develop a plan for supporting a range of studies, including large-scale randomized trials, for identifying optimal clinical management strategies, and for supporting the most promising treatments for COVID-19.......................that can easily be manufactured, distributed, and administered........
Though I would type it out in case anyone does not have access to this document.
Regards to all: Jaffjoon
SeaBoy & Matml74: Many many thanks for your detailed technical / medial explanations in your replies. its such a good feeling to receive scientific responses which are so educational.
Much appreciated: Jaffjoon
SeaBoy and other knowleagble posters. I have the following question:
I want to know whether its possible that the administration of SNG001 to patients who have already been vaccinated may have different results. The reason for my questions is that as we know none of the SNG001 trials are being conducted on patients that have been vaccinated (since vaccine has only recently been applied) and soon everyone will be vaccinated. So is there any reason why SNG001 may produce different results on already vaccinated patients ? I am not medically trained , so do not know the connection between the two.
If there is a connection between the two and it is found preferable for SNG001 to be administered to un-vaccinted patients , then its possible that vaccination may be halted in preference to SNG001.
Please respond to this if you can.
Many thanks. Jaffjoon
ggplyr: Just saw your question. I have copies and pasted my message of a few days ago below. You can also click on my name and look for my previous post on TSCO regarding the "Capital Return" issue.
Posted in: TSCO
Posts: 339
Price: 240.80
No Opinion
RE: Sp14 Jan 2021 16:24
The Vodafone sale of Verizone may have had some technicalities which were different but I`m not sure of all of them except with the Verizone deal shareholders were also given some shares in Verizone and perhaps that is the reason why Vodafone could call it a "Capital payment / Return" instead of Dividend. !
Anyway I`m sure its too late to change this now and I don`t think, little old me writing to TSCO will change anything since they have far cleverer people to advise them and if they could have done a "Capital return" I`m sure they would have. But "food for thought" for future sales.