RE: KRG Oil production, export, consumption and revenue report3 May 2020 23:44
I think there must be something essentially wrong going on here.
I feel our investments are out of control, and those trusted to manage this business on our behalf are not working to an agenda which follows any robust business strategy for a public company - nor does it display any intention to return the best outcome to its stockholders.
Hiding behind “we’re in a closed period you understand” to remove the facility for management to buy into the company and demonstrate personal involvement is a sham of course.
Using company assets to buy back shares, then sit on them (presumably for an anterior motive) which is proving to be only to the benefit of management. I predict more shares will be awarded to themselves, by themselves.
Avoiding using these funds to pay off a extremely expensive loan - which would demonstrate a logical move as there is no tax advantage in carrying a loan when funds are available to remove it from the books.
Not deploying the assets to better our business: new equipment to improve recovery (try and get it technically correct next time), drill wells in the correct locations to either improve reservoir knowledge or even increase production, hire the best oil industry personnel (possibly avoiding expensive future errors - or at least minimizing them), invest in gas processing plant - as we appear to be producing the stuff (which presumably came as a big surprise to our technical team), expand the business into another region, cancel the buybacks and proportionately revalue the shares on the open market, how about paying the shareholders a dividend via buyback shares ? ........ and shed loads of other possible strategies.
Mere PIs shouldn’t need to be spelling out a pick list of sensible strategies to a grossly overpaid BoD, now should we ?
Best then to squirrel the liquid assets of the company (with no declaration as to the strategy behind this choice) by a management who tactically avoid having no personal investment, nor are they exposed to any financial risk.
One could say their livelihood is invested - but technical failures, the secretive way in which our business is suspicially run, and the catalogue of missed deadlines and delayed promises - appears never to have cost anyone’s job.
I also feel that even the majority shareholders must now be realizing that this company is exhibiting unsound management practices, and is surely returning unsatisfactory profits and displays a growth vector which is at best, zero.
So, who behind the scenes is really calling the shots and benefitting from supporting this charade of self awards coupled to complete failure to grow one of the last big onshore discoveries - with the cheapest cost of production of onshore oil and (and now) gas of our times ?