RE: Paid de-rampers7 Jul 2025 11:20
If the adverts, which are designed to look as if they are from learned financial journals, are never effective who is going to the time and trouble and expense of creating them. Someone is paying money because they believe the articles will persuade people to buy. You have to ask the questions who is paying and why and why do they make it look as if the information is coming from financial journals? These are logical questions to ask and until those questions are answered no amount of talk about 'paid derampers' makes sense. Wise investors who are familiar with the nonsense in these articles should pat themselves on the back for being clever. Others bought in at 54p and saw their money disappear as the price dropped to 7.7p in the past few weeks. Why did the price drop? What new factor happened? There was no bad news, there was no good news. The difference was hundreds of millions of 2p warrants started to be exercised, diluting the price. It is true that the SP has since climbed to 20p. No new good news. One can only assume the features are sucking people in. People like to believe and they want to treble or quadruple their money and many have not read back through all the RNS articles to get the information they need. I was told by a friend, who I trusted had done his research, that this was a share to keep and forget about. I saw an article, I didn't see that it was sponsored. I bought. It crashed so quickly I couldn't sell. I kept pressing sell but so many other people were selling mine wouldn't go through. I have gambled my way back in by buying and selling a few times but I am still down. I was foolish. I will be accused now of being a shorter and a deramper! I am not. I might well short a share but have no idea who to borrow shares from in order to short them. And it woukd be a huge gamble as I have no idea really why this share has gone up again despite its recent history. Good luck all