Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
LOL.......brilliant find Slig
it still baffles the mind that looneys like Andy and Max choose to cite sources like moonofalabama and Colonel MacGregor as some sort of "proof" that their braindead, brainwashed and utterly ludicrous narratives have some substance to them.
these "commentators" are nothing more than either paid Russian shills (MacGregor) or desperate sad conspiracy theorists (like moonofalabama) yet Andy and Max are imbecilic enough to use them to support their delusions, when in fact it completely undermines anything they put forward as truth or reality
it would be like me stating the Holocaust wasn't real and citing Goebbels as a source.......utterly laughable
"Indrid I asked how you think Iraq and Turkey are going to be pressured"
no you did not.
you specifically mentioned "invading" Iraq, you moron.
the US has more political influence over Turkey and Iraq than Russia does, so it will apply any political pressure it can. It might work, it might not, but Russia has less to negotiate with than the US, no matter how many lies and deluded narratives you'll no doubt try to spin.
"Do you not think Russia have shown the feeble nature of sanctions now that the rest of the world are uniting?"
"feeble" sanctions? that is why Russia is running its biggest trade deficit on record, the ruble is the worst performing major currency of 2023, Russia recently hiked rates by the largest margin on record and Putin himself asked that sanctions need to be removed if he was to renter the grain deal.....
funny he would include "feeble" sanctions as part of negotiating tactics, eh?
and the "rest of the world"........why are you lying again?
here are the countries that vote with Russia at the UN......Syria, Iran, Belarus, North Korea, Eritrea, Mali and Nicaragua......FFS........LOL..........you're a clown Max and that is an insult to clowns.
why cant you even lie convincingly?
So Andy, in summary you cant counter a single point of mine with any shred of evidence, fact, reason or logic?
And your retort is just the ramblings of an inebriated 14 year old?
and Moonofalabama.........(where is that crying laughing face emjoi when you need him???)........no way you are citing that as a reliable unbiased source.......the mind boggles, it really does........as deluded as the come, mental.
Max
who said America wanted to "do something" to Iraq or Turkey (the latter being a NATO member)? Are you OK?
And "invade again"? Literally ZERO American desire to invade Iraq.....so again what planet are you on?
And you realise Russia wouldn't stand a chance in Iraq, right? You aren't THAT deluded, surely?
They cant even keep hold of territory taken within a neighbouring country, let alone one hundreds of miles away.
And Turkey obviously is a no go for Russia, even without NATO joining in (which of course they would be obliged to under article 5). Well the proof is there when Turkey shot down a Russian jet in 2015 and Russia didnt do anything.......shock, lol!
so again, we have to ask, what are you bleating on about?
Andy, rather than some vague, intellectually stunted, counter-argument-lacking retort, why not PROVE my statements false? Wouldn't that be the grown up and informed way to approach this?
Or are you another Max (a.k.a cerebrally challenged cretin) who just pretends things are not true simply because he doesn't like the sound of them?
Shall I hold my breath for you to deliver your version of "reality" to us mere mortals?
Again, utterly priceless
rogthegamer
max is delusional/bordering on mentally deranged and has a take on geo-politics akin to the take gemma collins would have on quantum physics.
either that or he actually knows how weak russia is, but like the standard internet based pro-russian troll he will just make up the most laughable of narratives and lie through his teeth......alas such is the way nowadays with online anonymity.
reality is (for any informed and honest individual) russia leads their own bargain-basement nato called the ctso (it's a complete joke when you look at the members) and essentially russia is meant to come to the aid of any members that are attacked.
azerbaijan have recently started striking key armenian targets in the disputed nagorno-karabakh region and russia are obligated to come to armenia's aid.
but are they? of course not.
they cant even defend their own borders from russian militia and ukrainian drones.
then despite having over 12 months to dig and prepare defences in the south and east of ukraine, the ukrainians are still taking back ground with less troops than russia, 10% of russia's artillery numbers, mining like never seen before, and no air support. but russia so stronk, right? lol
russia's military is so degraded they couldn't even offer security guarantees to regions within their own borders let alone foreign ones. the kremlin has literally told places like belgorod they have an "obligation to defend themselves"
let max have his bat-****-crazy fantasy's if it makes him feel better, most would want to at least appear informed or even slightly intelligent, but max seems to be happy trying to display the polar opposite.
"The idea that you quote them having a t34 at their military parade is not worthy of answering"
it was literally broadcast by Russian TV you utter lunatic
"Nato ARE fully committed"
provide a single shred of evidence of NATO boots on the ground
"Man you're nuts. Advancing??? Ha ha ha christ"
you're bordering on insane max, even Russian mill-bloggers dont lie and deny as blatant as you
Indrid what sources are you using???
for what you moron? for Finland joining NATO? or open sources like Oryx cataloguing materiel losses, for open source mapping for territorial control shifts?
"4. Needle are fully involved and completely committed and they are losing at all levels"
......lol, what?
5. All experts agree it is only the West who would be mad enough to use nuclear weapons Russia have stated categorically they will only respond the west changed their own laws to allow them to preemptively strike. The west are losing and therefore they are the ones we are in danger of using nuclear weapons. Russia has developed hypersonic which puts them ahead in the arms race for quite a while. All military experts know that the West have no answer to this currently.
another bare faced lie, the west (and even China) have categorcaiily told Russia they can not use nuclear weapons after threatening to use them on a daily basis
no experts have said anything of the sort, if so provide proof
A Kinzal was shot down by a Patriot, so why on earth are you lying again?
"destroyed an army" - the army which is still advancing, stopping Russia advancing anywhere and is larger and more well equipped than pre invasion.....?
so another lie proven Max.......come one, gotta try harder
"He has successfully destroyed NATO shown it for the paper tiger it is, emptied its reserves of all artillery shells, and has absolutely stopped it moving any further than he wanted to. He will not stop until he goes to the Polish border if necessary"
utterly, utterly deluded or just a bare faced lie. the US and Germany have planned to scaled up artillery shell production 10 fold. add to that Germany has upped over all military spending to $100 billion.
NATO has more troops than ever, lost a fraction of the tanks, weapons systems, Russia has.......no fixed wing or rotary air combat vehicles destroyed for the west, hundreds for Russia...... russia hasnt even managed to destroy a single HIMARS system yet
Putin categorically stated NATO is not to move "an inch further east".................Finland DOUBLED, literally DOUBLED the NATO border with Russia
so another bare faced lie Max........you seriously have an issue, cerebrally speaking
wont stop to the Polish border??????......wtf, he cant even take 20% of Ukraine!!!!
"1. No he made absolutely no miss calculation and planned his strategy to perfection"
wtf, you didnt actually write that with a straight face did you?
the mind boggles at how utterly moronic and detached from reality you really are
"One other question, have you been following the G20 summit in Delhi?"
is this the summit where Russia signed an agreement stating it was a "war", but yet Putin has been arresting his own people for using the word "war" and demanding his population/leadership only refer to said "war" as a "special military operation"?
"Oh Actually I have one more question what is the population of all the countries combined which you named?"
far, far, far more than those that vote with Russia........
Max
answer my questions i put to you previously (the ones you pretended you "didnt have time for"), then i will engage with you
1) Did Putin make a massive miscalculation about how willing the west would be to get involved?
2) Putin stated a primary/strategic goal of the war was to ensure the non-expansion of NATO, how did that work out for him?
3) Putin has repeatedly warned of "red lines" that shouldn't be crossed, can you confirm what he did when the West crossed them every time?
4) If NATO get fully involved in the war, who wins based on a very high degree of probability?
5) Is it the sign of a stable, just and fair leadership that on a weekly basis they repeatedly threaten to nuke major cities across the globe?
6) Russia had a single tank at their victory day parade, a T-34 which was made in the 1940's. Is that a sign of strength or weakness?
7) Who won the cold war and why did the USSR collapse?
8) Before the Maidan Revolution the democratically elected Ukrainian parliament voted to remove the Russian puppet president Viktor Yanukovych, what were the numbers of the Yes to No votes cast for his removal from office?
"Well, the collective West has redirected more than $100b in taxpayer money"
first off, that is the only response to my losses of "men and materiel" question then? brilliant.
secondly, you do realise its not just simply $100b of "tax payer money"? That is a blatant lie/propaganda line or you just don't know what you are talking about.
weaponry is a huge part of that figure, do you know how much of that is going to be saved in decommissioning costs?
and do you want to work out what that $100 billion works out per capita?
and yes on Ukraines losses, but Ukraine is not part of "the west", so another moot point. Add to that Ukraine didnt choose to be invaded, they have to fight or risk losing their freedoms, so their sacrifices are worth far, far more than anything Russia has to offer it's people, so another irrelevant point.
and no the sanctions haven't driven the Saudis away, it's the US's stance on human rights issues.
how has Germany been humiliated exactly?
cheap energy to China? eh, how is that a win for Russia, it's literally selling its most valuable export at prices way lower than it was pre war, and lower than current market prices, Russia is losing out far more than the West on the energy front.
"Have fun paying stupid power bills and having your daughter turned into a fake man by bolshevik groomers"
and well, that is just the ramblings of cerebrally challenged buffoon
Max, you are bordering on insane. You are utterly, positively, categorically deluded.
"Ukraine he's winning hands down" ........how? Is it because Russia still hold 17% of Ukrainian territory? (despite holding 25% one month into the war)
I bet in your uneducated mind the Nazi's only started losing WW2 when they were pushed back to their own borders then, right?
And if Putin is not only beating Ukraine, he is also beating the West, can you tell us all (this will be funny) how much the West has lost by supporting Ukraine then? Come on, lets tally up Russian losses, men and materiel, with that of the West? Or is that another question you conveniently don't have "time" to answer?
"he's united the world with the West as enemy number one"
What on earth are you going on about, you aren't even trying to be believable anymore. Why lie about something so blatantly false it would take a 5 second google to prove you wrong? Is there genuinely something wrong with you?
list the countries that vote with Russia at the UN, come on, lets see if you have an ounce of honesty in you?
And then this "world" in your head doesn't include the USA, UK, France, Germany, Japan, Italy, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Greece, Belgium, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, Turkey, New Zealand, Chezch Republic, Croatia, Iceland, Luxembourg, Norway, Slovenia, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, Canada?
Because those are all the ones that have been supplying weapons and aid to assist Ukraine
and then addiotnally the UN vote for Russia to immediately cease its invasion of Ukraine was 141 against Russia and 7 for Russia......do you want to tell the BB who those 7 were? LOL
then have a look a the list of the countries providing aid to Ukraine, magically these are the most developed and democratic countries on the planet. they have the highest levels of education, social care, standards of living and GDP per capitas........but yeh YOU are the one on the right side of history, right?
mental, simply mental
but yes the "world" is with Russia............you're such an idiot Max