Member Info for inanaco

I don't need cheap points ........

However air miles would be useful ..

let the sanctimonious continue on his crusade ... of No SH ... LOL

Quite right Bob as there has to be some legal structure around it otherwise those that contribute outside of the patent would see no future involvement

and the way its clocking up ...

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/229963

LOL ........ and we all know, No Deal is better than a Bad deal

point being is, if they had "conditions" ie you cannot apply if you are from a Rich University or Company ... especially American as they are so well funded ... you would remove 90% of the applications ...

Be Careful of Socialist thinking .......... Venezuela comes to mind

The Grants do not need to look at the fiscal status of any project as the grant itself solves the fiscal status

time will tell ..... ATB

the family are the shareholders ... family sometimes do not see eye to eye ... LOL or have you reinvented history

repeat your words ........ No shareholders .. now you have accepted they have shareholders .. LOL

forgot

Your last sentence is very very interesting. Please elaborate on why the science is not that great.

track the value of a single share since it was floated ... ATB its a good indicator of issues

Ray has explained it for you ................

its very difficult to work out "weeks" survival ... from a baseline in patients that are close to death ...

to do that you would need a 1000 patient trial not 7 to prove efficacy

now you are buying a share based on that data ... its up to you ...

would you no apologise for this statement

"""" Inanaco if you only wound your neck in and actually read what people post you may actually gain a better insight rather than presume you understand when you patently don’t.""""

as clearly your Comosnybthey is predictive text gobblygook confused the issue

and even if you had written it correctly ... you would still have been wrong

play the game

"""Comosnybthey can do it without resorting to the needs of SH as there are none.
Hope this makes sense.""""

Boehringer Ingelheim can do it without resorting to the needs of SH as there are none.
Hope this makes sense."""

and that then solves the mystery that you think Private Limited Companies have no shareholders ...

case rested

so its a Limited liability company ( GmbH ) Boehringer Ingelheim

so your statement was still wrong ................. as you said it had NO shareholders Ivy ... imposible

its a family owned private Limited company the same as BioNtech ? is that correct

I miss read Ivy post ... here is the full text

For instance at my time in Merck the whole Company became fixated by quarterly results and the SP to keep the SH happy so sometimes long term goals become overridden by short term objectives.
Whereas where I am now as it is family owned and they want to spend $1bn on a IO
Comosnybthey can do it without resorting to the needs of SH as there are none.
Hope this makes sense.

"""Comosnybthey can do it without resorting to the needs of SH as there are none.
Hope this makes sense.""""

that is the bit that confused me and everyone else .............

but your getting into hypothetical neverendum ..........

Fact is without some sort of the stock market ... you cannot buy into scancell

the problem is ivy in your speech was this

Comosnybthey

which i did reprint for you to explain ...

Ivy ... so what company do you work for ?

Crumbs you are suggesting that shareholders run the PLC ... when in reality directors run the companies

Shareholders cannot sell scancell ............ only Scancell directors can sell scancell with shareholder approval

Shareholders can sell shares in scancell to the market or whoever wants to buy them ...

But they have limits ... 3% of the company .. before disclosure ....