Member Info for in4cedros

Bespoke - many thanks for that great evidential link - I'd completely missed that video which I enjoyed in its entirety - that's the sort of pitch that Leo must have put to the BPC BOD - very impressive - perhaps rossannan missed it too or was just too embarrassed to watch it after Koot made a monkey out of him over the financing of Saffron 1 !

rossannan - you asked are the odds ' fairly good ' - you tell us rossannan what other Exploration Oil Drills with the potential of P1 are available with better odds ?

If you mean the odds of not losing money are better in a Post Office Account we are agreed - but if you have that sort of attitude to risk why are you on a chat board for a real O&G Exploration and Production Company with all the associated risks !

Bespoke - as you know I follow the story quite closely and am keen to evidence material for my book where possible.

I can't remember seeing anything from CERP/BPC referring to the terms of the Saffron 2 offer except they would drill for free in exchange for a share of production- where are you getting your information?

IreneKrapp - same old, same old boring krapp from a worthless troll.

The projections for development of the ex-CERP assets are on the BPC website - why don't you tell us why you believe they are implausible and give your supporting evidence? Whilst you're about it publish the evidence to support your fabricated allegations about my trading history on CERP ( hint - known only to Her Majesty and me ! ).

Shark - I wasn't surprised at the garbage from Irene - if you look at the posting history you'll see she had to be robustly educated on takeover premium from a position of total ignorance, on this very board, only a few months ago!

Re rossannan and conspiracy theories I'd pay close attention as he's known for his creativity in this area. I think Offerman's still got James Bond and Ursula emerging from the waves on his mind following Sean's death in Bahamas and wants to draft the next film script using the BPC drill as the theme - get Potter's name in there somewhere to attract the younger viewers !

rossannan - you told us ad nauseam ( that should have been your moniker ! ) that 35% COS wasn't good enough for you so even if your memory has let you down on the lag factor you still won't risk it - the prize remains the same for those who are prepared to take the risk and they do make that commercial discovery .

DavidBrent - you're getting close to rossannan obsession levels for someone who doesn't believe in the company - at least he comes up with some challenging arguments occasionally!

rossannan you have been busy telling the world and his wife that you were only here for the pre - drill excitement play because the 35% COS was too low for your risk appetite. You've discussed COS before on here, at length, so presumably you made your decision with knowledge about how COS is evaluated- 35% wasn't good enough for you then - nothing's changed under the sea bed since - why are you bothered about it now - unless it's just another trolling move - are you building up to pull that cash for not posting stunt on the BPC readers - I can't see it going any better here for you !

rossannan - like Krapper and LayLadyLay you seem to have a Post Office Book attitude to risk. There is nothing wrong with having that attitude but you should consult the Government sponsored moneyadvice website to match your investment with a type that suits that risk.

If you consulted that site you'd find BPC was in the highest risk category- investors here are aware of it - it seems only trolls are ignorant of that fact.

Our latest investor with the 15% guaranteed return has secured upside risk with a downside guaranteed minimum return - a magnificent deal for them - the only downside I see is the corporate risk relating to BPC and now that they have the CERP Saint Bernard in the background I think the odds are good they will pay out on this bet even in the worst case scenario.

rossannan - you claimed to have done due diligence on BPC before you invested - why didn't you voice your concerns about production license when you were holding shares which were fully funded despite the recent dilution ?

At least no one was taken by surprise by your MO -I believe that cash in return for a posting holiday stunt even amazed the LSE moderators !

Benty48 - LOL - you're right I'm addressing DavidBrent - apologies to him - despite my disagreement with him I'm not suggesting he's Bent just indelicate with his language!

DavidBent - you've referred to dishonesty here but I don't have full details of the contract terms between Stena and BPC ( as you are asking about them I'm assuming you don't either! ) - i certainly wouldn't use the term dishonest unless I could evidence the dishonesty( such as Irene Krapp posting about my alleged trading losses without being able to evidence them zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!)

Judging from the information supplied by the company post Covid-19 the daily rate reduced from pre- Covid levels hence the fanfare from BOD when Stena appointed but you and I haven't seen the small print - it might have said BPC to pay any additional costs Stena incur in progressing drill in Covid safe and timely manner - would I have signed up for that? - possibly if that was the best terms I could get - who is to say what other terms are available- some things you have to trust the BOD on unless you have information to the contrary.

People like rossannan think they can run the company they invest in like Fantasy Oil & Gas Manager game but they don't have full information or professional expertise - doesn't mean we have to accept what BOD say without comment and not challenge where appropriate but dishonesty is a strong word to use from a position of ignorance David!

DavidBrent - ' ugly and dishonest ' - have you thought about legal action to compensate your shareholding losses - how much are they for a non shareholder these days - perhaps phone a friend, Krapper ?

DavidBrent - I see you're still on chapter One of Shorting For Dummies - go for the sensational misunderstanding dumbarxe routine - well executed BTW!

rossannan - many people hung on your every word whilst you did due diligence on this - you then bought in after being satisfied with the funding for the drill - I'm blaming you for not warning all your followers this extra funding might happen - where's your sense of responsibility?

Gnevans - re your Secret Santa offer do you have addresses for Krapper and Dross?

I'm amazed Krapper is back to quote Google basics of Oil Wells to us - you embarrassed yourself talking to Coman and disappeared for a while like Dross - tail between your legs - give it up permanently you worthless troll!

rossannan - I agree WTI is important but I recommend readers here also give your posting history more than a cursory glance - you have become quite skilled at disingenuous posting as part of your trolling style and the stunt you pulled over on CERP where you invited readers to pay cash in return for you taking a holiday from posting was certainly not one I've seen before on these boards!

This guy makes Jonah appear lucky so you've just got to hope he moves on soon!

rossannan - I see you are attempting to rewrite history, whitewashing over your trolling campaign extending over close to a year ending with Koot making a monkey out of you!

Those that know you of old understand your tricks - I don't speak for jcgswims but that moderator of the non- nutters thread over on ADVFN gave you a second chance which you blew because you just can't help yourself !

You should consider what Trek says - I didn't see him have a hissy fit about the management of Paul Baay at TXP and selling at 0.18 before it more than 5 bagged - CERP more than doubled after Saffron- what prospects for BPC now you're out!

rossannan - I can see why you prefer LSE - it enables you to irritate a wider audience but even the moderation here eventually put a stop to your cash donations in return for non trolling scheme!