RE: and one on Proactive21 Apr 2018 15:42
emily - I thought I was generally being quite supportive of the Company as I have said that fundamentally it is a good model but someone needs to be the Mahout for that rather large elephant in the room! Even I am a bit half-hearted about it but there is far too much sweeping under the carpet going on and it was the back slapping of MDV share purchase, after taking the bonus, which latterly stirred me up again and stimulated me to investigate further.
I then find that posters have been supporting the director remuneration packages without, apparently, knowing what they currently earn - which strikes me as odd.Thst further encouraged me to look at AGM situation and powers for BOD to vote more bonus.
There is often talk about the Westminster Bubble in politics where the views of the proletariat are not reflected - I am inclined to think the BOD act in a similar way - Kerim ducked the SP question in the LSE interview and recently when asked merely reflected it should be a multiple of current level - reality is the current SP but he does not appear very bothered because he can wait it out - with the help of a nice little bonus!
There is a disconnect between BOD and shareholders - the NED should have said - how will this trough snorting look to shareholders - perhaps he did and was ignored - who knows!
You asked me not to post against the company and where I have been more robust in my criticism I have generally been listened to fairly not as someone looking to gain financial advantage but as someone airing some washing that had an unpleasant niff to it - I would like the company to succeed but I do believe Kerim needs to address the issues that are bothersome both to shareholders and potential shareholders..