Member Info for hxulcolrdoh

Hi Komakino,

I would have said that given last years 2024 YE accounts DEBACLE (the auditor resigned having disclaimed the results) it was more important than ever that shareholders be provided with reassurance in the form of timely accounts endorsed by an auditor that the company is a going concern.

As is it looks like management are laying the groundwork for at least the possibility of the non appearance of the accounts.

If a suspension is on the horizon in the later half of June this leaves shareholders with a dilemma. Post a suspension at that time if the company fails to file accounts by the end of year they will probably be de listed. Subsequent to that, whether or when SAVE shareholders will be able to access their investment funds will become an unknown. If a window of opportunity is closing do they stay or do they go?

Long suffering shareholders don't deserve this. If it comes about of all the factors that management could or could not control this one was 100% within their domain and if it does I might think that there was method to the madness.

I also note that where all recent previous AGM's have been held in London the next one is at the offices of Burness Paull LLP, Edinburgh ?

In any normal company the first item on an AGM agenda is the proposed acceptance of the annual accounts.

In a repeat of last year this will not happen at SAVE "The Company currently EXPECTS to release its 2025 annual report and accounts in June 2026. Approval of the 2025 annual report and accounts will, therefore, take place at a separate general meeting which will be held in Q3 2026" (last year the separate meeting never happened AFAIK).

Pathetically SAVE haven't met the regulatory 6 month YE accounts deadline since those for YE 2018. Maybe shareholders take comfort from the fact that this is lamentably par for the course at SAVE. However this year management are totally devoid of all fig leafs and have ZERO excuse for not producing timely accounts.

Are they going to miss the end of June deadline and be suspended ?

Sums up the ZIOC situation nicely

https://youtu.be/meiU6TxysCg?t=78

In return for handing over a rock two monkeys get a reward.

One gets a derisory slice of cucumber the other gets grapes.

Including dividends correct that to a 8.5% p.a. return over the term.

Hopefully you sold when it peaked at that time. Otherwise the 20 bagger wilted to a 3.5 bagger and if held to the present would equate to a 5% p.a. return.

"Past performance is not indicative of future results" seems very much to apply to CLI.

Interesting video by Peter Zeihan.

Leading the way in Net Zero California may also me a leader in what happens when there is failure to secure/diversify energy supply stateside.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtq0-cknQnE

I believe this is the presentation referred to.

https://www.serica-energy.com/downloads/presentations/Presentation%20to%20fixed%20income%20investors.pdf

Read Viceroy nonsense.

Seems quite desperate.

Further if they think today's RNS is a breach of UK Market Abuse Regulation then I thought they are complaining to the wrong authority.

Re "Coincidentally, what a day it would be if they chose to release a better than estimated provision today, with an Iran ceasefire agreed in the background… £300-£400m and this is set to fly."

Strewth. Got that right!.

Same old same old.

Jul 26, 2025 - "President Bola Tinubu has announced a ₦4 trillion bond programme to tackle longstanding debts owed to power generation companies (GENCOs)"

https://premiumtribune.news.blog/2025/07/26/tinubu-unveils-%E2%82%A64-trillion-plan-to-clear-electricity-debts/

Given that a ₦200m / per month shortfall needs to be put into the system just to stand still I doubt if much progress is being made.

Thanks Eureka.

So if CBG's profile reflected the broader market and if pre 2014 claims were thrown out CBG's redress bill would reduce by 30%+

Correction : Pre 2104/Post 2014 -> Pre 2014/Post 2014

How is CBG's redress provision split between pre 2104/post 2014 claims does anyone know ?

I be curious to know CBG's thinking on the same two numbers was i.e.

- what percentage of their agreements were "unfair"

- what the average payout would be

FCA last known thinking.

First published: 11/01/2024 Last updated: 04/03/2026

https://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/car-finance-complaints

"We estimate that 44% of all agreements made since 2007 will be considered unfair"

"we expect people to receive an average of £700 per agreement"

Seriously impressed with your ability to harness AI Knot.

Have you been watching Dave Plummer ( https://www.youtube.com/@DavesGarage/videos ) ?

Donald mentioned the war (but I think he got away with it)

In the Oval Office he was explaining to Japan's Prime Minister how USA bombing raids had taken the Iranians by surprise - but he noted that there wasn't much that you could teach the Japanese about surprise attacks!

Looks like Donald reads the board. He and his friends have escalated into attacking gas infrastructure.

The day will dawn when Donald rues having been talked/coerced into joining Bibi's Iranian adventure.

Only 95% vote? Only 42 years in power?

I must admit that if I ruled the world, my No.1 rule (taking a leaf from the American Constitution) would be that nobody holds a high office (whether it is president of a country, London Mayor, top executive, whatever) for more than 8 years.

Otherwise you end up with the Lukashenkos, Xi Jinpings, Mugabes, Netanyahus, Putins, Kim Jong Un's of this world.

The FCA have optimised the environment for doubt and uncertainty. Viceroy had made hay while the sun shines.

IMO the churn continues until the FCA stops undermining the industry.

My judgement that management have acted prudently and conservatively I admit is undermined by their unwillingness to confront misinformation or put any skin in the game.