Member Info for hold4results

You can secure the continuity of human civilisation on your home planet NOW with 12 easy payments of just £999M (plus p+p). CALL NOW! While stocks last.

Sweet jebus. An antivaxxer who claims to be a teacher. I thought they did screening for dangerous extremists

£3.21. Plucked out of the ether.

****ty comp mate. Just read a lot of books

Yeah ok, I'm not going to win this one. I do think the chances that it will be worth a lot more in the near future are very good, hence I'm still here.

My way makes sense to me and I honestly think it makes me a better speculator, by overcoming psychological bias, but who knows. Each to their own way of looking at it.

OK, I'm probably being an arse and maybe this is just semantics. From my perspective, it is a sort of category error to suggest the market could be wrong, it is literally impossible. The value of the company is set by the market. That value can rapidly change, but there is no point at which it can be 'wrong'.

I do understand what you mean. We can talk about whether it ought to be worth more or less and whether it will be worth more or less. Just not whether it is worth more or less. It's worth 218p.

Here endeth the philosophy lecture. I'll get my coat.

The market is never wrong and the shares are worth 218p.

For now.

I think we actually predicted here that Gilead might try combining Remdesivir with interferon beta. Actually I mean I know I said precisely that, but I think someone else pointed out Gilead's nebuliser move first. Why they would want to use the injected form - especially while moving remdesivir to nebulised form - is beyond me. Maybe there's a patent in the way?

Given all we know, it would extremely surprising if the injected form worked better than the nebulised form. We know it means a much higher dose to get it where it needs to go, and we know that means unwanted side effects.

RickAAAYYYYY

Has to be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsmVgoXDq2w

I'd never heard that Divine Comedy track, thanks for that. I loved Fin De Siecle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LX5023PmMU

I don't think he'll fall for it but that was a very wily ego poke. Behave

Eva took a crazy risk and it paid off. I don't think she was under any illusions that it was anything else but a crazy risk. I can't help but like those people. If they're smart, they'll learn quick, if not they'll lose it all.

The founder of Fedex once bet the company's remaining funds on single roulette spin. It was a perfectly rational move in the context. We don't know anybody else's contexts.

Eva, I do think you were wrong about this bb not mattering and only having 1% of marketcap. Probably right for most shares, but we could easily have 5%+ of the company bickering like children here :) and another 15% watching quietly. Remember you had over 0.1% yourself. It may actually matter more than usual.

I don't think any of us can put a timeline on it because the situation is so unusual - all we know is it's very, very urgent.
I hope it isn't our friend Steve Goodacre. Or that he's at least cheered up a bit since manic monday.

Makes sense. Lovely image

Thanks for sharing nolupus. Strikes me as eminently sensible.
Curious if you had the same approach with Lupuzor? I got burnt there.
In the same spirit, my first buy was at 24p, avg before news 39p, avg now 78p. Did have to throw self-imposed maximum % out the window but the results were just too good. And I am not sensible.

We're actually also a treatment for flu, as well as the common cold. Which is nice.

I don't understand what this means, help me out?

Coshman - they don't. Charting is the misguided attempt to find patterns in chaos. Though you will find plenty of people who use it to make fortunes, plenty more have lost 'em

Resistance is futile!

Would anybody like a biscuit? I've got chocolate bourbons, pink wafers and I think there's a few jammy dodgers left.