Member Info for HHReturns

Yes, still says a nominee account, as I said myself. It's not one of the normal ones though - HL, II, Barclays, Halifax etc.

If you check the previous Company Secretary details then it is BNP Paribas. If you check the postcode and address for all current officers (10 Hardwood Avenue NW1 6AA) then that is the address for BNP Paribas.

BNP Paribas.

I missed the previous reply. Started typing and then got distracted.

They're just a nominee account either way. Is it another name / new name for II or an equivalent?

Yes Aimgainer, that's right

You are also talking about a director full of integrity, which isn't always the case on AIM. It doesn't mean that he will always get it right but he is honest and has invested both to support the company and because he believes it will be successful.

Please just keep this nonsense of the Board. We need to have decent discussions about the Company rather than this carp.

Semnet was bought a year earlier than the year end for the results just out, so how much of the 91% revenue growth was just from that acquisition, and how was from the existing units growing?

And not the revenue either. Is there a breakdown of the contribution from the different units? Apologies if I missed it

The cyber security revenue is Semnet then, isn't it? Not the income expected, if so.

Lack of buying, lack of selling, lack of posts. A lack of interest here generally. The board needs to do more to promote this listed business as without buys the share isn't likely to do much.

Let's see what they present on Tuesday and assess them accordingly.

hopefully right 86kb.

lord knows that long term shareholders here have eaten enough **** for a lifetime already.

No-one who is familiar with this company will have forgotten how they so often raise after such announcements. Don't be surprised if lightning strikes again, but I hope it doesn't for you all.

Come on Profit Jock. There was never any actual reason for the rise. The whole company is a Fugazi, making dodgy promotional adverts to sucker people in when there are a gazillion warrants at a few pence a share that insider's are selling to PI's at a pound a share.

They stop the selling every now and then to foster the rise and then they turn on the taps again. Gamble by all means, but don't pretend this company isn't a crock, as it is. It owns a tiny fraction of the revenue that is detailed in the projects it RNS's.

"We propose a name change so that people will think we are a new company and so encourage new investment from those who are unaware about previous share price losses.....'

Going to sting here today then, even though there were plenty of positives in the RNS (as well as negatives)

Billy, I know you were asking someone else, but my view is that they wanted to jump onto the Crypto Treasury bandwagon but they actually jumped into the fizzling of it instead, after leaving it too late. They wanted to generate a meaningful sp uplift from the BTC news but that didn't happen.

The Maths itself don't make sense in that BTC would have to increase massively from here in short order just to compensate for the discount in the placing that got them the funds for it.

They are stuck really, as they can't sell the same BTC to engineer a buyback now as they are likely looking at acquisitions anyway, and would look silly switching tack so quickly, and as a Crypto company.

I don't think it was needed. Someone who sells sweets doesn't have to eat loads of sweets themselves to be able to sell them successfully to someone else.

Getting 2m cash to swap for 2m of a different currency of cash hasn't cost them more than 2m in market cap in the process.

Pass through now and again?

Yeah right. I can absolutely guarantee you check this board at least half a dozen times a day, even though uninvested. Total weirdo.

Loads of shares sloshing around. Placees trying to flip the shares themselves at a small profit and then just keep the warrants as a free dice roll.