Member Info for HHReturns

Some big sells though. I won't say it, but many may be thinking it....

These companies don't always care about profit and loss. Sounds crazy, I know, but when they are on a big loss they will often just exit and get the holding off their books. It means less questions to answer than just showing a big negative in their annual report. It's not their money anyway.

Give over Goldie. I'm not even convinced you're still in. You're one of the most prolific spouters of nonsense on these Boards. Buying after a 400% rise in a few hours is obviously high risk.

What was sold for $36m do you think then Lloyd? A million copies of Norton Anti-Virus 2025 at 36 bucks a pop?

Again, they've either sold to replace (best case scenario for holders) or they are worried that it will drop right back and so are taking whatever profit they can whilst the sp is above the exercise price.

No point exercising without selling as you then bring the risk of capital loss into play unnecessarily.

Back up to 28 billion shares again even after doing a 10-1 share consolidation last year.

Yes, peanuts maybe, but you don't exercise warrants without immediately selling them. Perhaps they sold some normal shares near the peak and then replaced them with these. Not much profit on these ones otherwise.

Each question asked and supposedly answered by the Company just spawns more questions. Hmmm

This $36m contract is odd one way or another. Either it is legit and then the ex-employees tried to take the relationship for themselves post purchase (which would seem an open and shut case with a standard non-compete clause. Alternatively, it was not legit, in which case the whole listing thing falls down before it gets going. In the second scenario though, why the arbitration etc? In the first scenario, how did a tiny company secure such a contract and when is GST's share of the revenue.

To suggest that it happened pre-purchase (the whole $36m contract and all the work for it) doesn't make a lot of sense either to me - it's not like you get $36m for installing a quick anti-virus on a couple of laptops as a one-off job.

We come back to the opaqueness of so many things here. Either it's just unprofessional, which isn't great but can be fixed if there is the Board willingness to do so or it is deliberately designed to be opaque, which is much worse.

That's cool Profit Jock. I appreciate your position as a holder and I'll await their call with anticipation. I don't make claims lightly, but I'm pretty confident here. Hopefully you exit with clothes intact as I don't wish I'll on anyone. Equally though, I don't like newbies being sucked in with bs or half/quarter truths.

Yes, she's definitely amateur hour and not up to the task. Reading slides should be minimum wage, not her salary. Useless.

It can't go much lower FFS

Can it?

Thanks Sparky. Presumably Wellesley will be buying back at half price as well then.

Thanks for sharing.

The SP isn't going to go anywhere fast without buyers. I asked a question on the call about how they would raise the profile and increase investor interest in the stock and the answer was unsatisfactory. They basically said that they would concentrate on good news and then the SP will follow but buyers are like oxygen and a stock needs a supply to even keep stable because there will always be someone who needs to sell for their own needs. Without some sort of buying volume the SP risks stagnating. It is no good releasing good news to double the SP is the SP has fallen 50% in the meantime.

Get the directors taking a payout / half pay in shares or something similar. If they aren't minded to invest in the stock at all time lows then how can they expect anyone else to?

They seemed honest and reasonably professional on the call but equally they didn't seem dynamic. Something is needed here to push the business on and successfully through this pivot

I didn't even realise that it dropped quite that low, but well done.

If you believe all that Profit Jock then just relax, as value will out in the end. The level of your frantic posting to defend the share might suggest to some that perhaps you are starting to worry that the naysayers might be right here, and the company may indeed by a bit smelly.

Not that big chumba, I agree. Still depressing to see sells at 0.62 though

Well nothing so sure as if they raise down here to buy more BTC, or for anything short of the secret formula for KFC's blend of herbs and spices then sentiment will be shot for a while.

Net assets of 8.44m US as the year end, and that includes the cash? Revenue for the year of 2.96m US and a net loss of 2.2m US for the year.

20p + only recently (after a good rise to get there in quick order) Where will it stop?