Member Info for HeadInTheSand

Https://theesk.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/kicking-can.jpg

Whispering, you're neither challenging anything, nor are you particularly challenging in any way.

All you've done (in the two months since you first registered on LSE) is continue to burble that it all might well come good in the end - much like a talent-free orphan Annie in some dire SEN primary school production tunelessly belting out the "Tomorrow" song at the top of her atonal little lungs.

Much like Amit himself, you entirely rely upon the cold hard logical fact that it is impossible to categorically prove a negative, no matter how much the huge weight of evidence clearly indicating said negative.

On that basis, I expect you'll carry on pom-pom waving for Amit for the foreseeable. Tiresome? Yes. Trite? Certainly. But challenging? Hardly.

Talking rubbish, am I? Making something up, possibly? Nope... that's what you do, Onetomany.

This is pathetically easy to prove - here's a post you made on he 5th of January this year, copied verbatim. It's freely available to view in your post history:-

************

Onetomany Premium Member

Posted in: ANGS

Posts: 253

Price: 0.50

No Opinion

RE: Positive indicators 5 Jan 2024 14:35

Barney I think once funding terms are clarified and signed then that in itself will have a major boost. Gas I’m expecting to reach 120+ over the coming cold months and a storage partner update also due within Q1.

Take a look at the CPR and the many references to it by the BoD. End of March I expect 1.5p of not more. It’s all upside from here but still some variables.

************

Oops. Sure, there's a fairytale spinner here... but it very provably isn't me.

How does Onetomany get his buying insights?

Simple - he just makes stuff up in the hope that suckers will fall for it so he can trade more easily. Remember, this is the guy who assured everyone less than 4 months ago that the SP would be 1.5p at a minimum (!!!) by the end of March this year...

"Oil prices lower after Iran attack on Israel"

"Prices had already risen in expectation of action by Iran, with Brent crude nearing a six-month high last week."

"Energy analyst Vandana Hari said the fall in the price of oil meant "clearly, the oil market does not see the need to factor in any additional supply threat at this point."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68812949

They're smart boys, these commodity traders.

Why not make another prediction? It could hardly be more ridiculous than your last effort.

What "external factors"? You were punting the funding being signed off as being the core reason behind your farcical prediction of a rise in the ANGS SP to 1.5p.

Well, reality check for the afflicted. The funding was signed off, but rather than trebling as per your assurances, the SP has actually fallen a further 30% from the point that you came up with your latest fairytale.

Onetomany, the guy who assured everyone in January this year that the ANGS SP would be 1.5p or more by the end of March, is doing his best to ramp the unrampable again, I see.

Just for giggles, here's his laughably ludicrous post from 3 months back:-

Onetomany Premium Member

Posted in: ANGS

Posts: 243

Price: 0.50

RE: Positive indicators 5 Jan 2024 14:35

Barney I think once funding terms are clarified and signed then that in itself will have a major boost. Gas I’m expecting to reach 120+ over the coming cold months and a storage partner update also due within Q1.

Take a look at the CPR and the many references to it by the BoD. End of March I expect 1.5p of not more. It’s all upside from here.

The lunatics have taken over the asylum, clearly.

Sooooo Cindy, as you seem to think yourself in the know, how many of the post-delist website updates is Amit now claiming are 3rd party authored BS? Some of them? All of them? Do tell.

More importantly and utterly irrelevant of any post-delisting website updates, given Amit's unassisted track record on both truthfulness and delivery, it is hard to imagine how anything could further adversely affect his "reputation".

Ocelot is oh so obviously a paid PR shill.

This is by now totally surreal. As Glosman points out. if any of this were in any way true, the simplest and thus first thing any "paying agent" would do is contact brokers. There aren't that many of them and contact with them would probably account for say at least 75% of PIs.

But not a single mention of broker contact and instead, only the slightly trickier (but hardly impossible) task of contacting actual paper certificate holders is now being mentioned.

Pathetic. Expect yet another can kick shortly.

As has been commented God knows how many times, it is impossible to prove a negative.

And that is something that both Amit and the optimists rely upon.

SaaS? I think that dead duck was buried long ago as far as CTAG is concerned. For the last few years, Amit's been claiming it's all about DaaP, no?

(Though I doubt he knows what that means).

I see with some amusement (but no surprise) that posts laying out inconvenient but literally undeniable truths are being deleted.

Ocelot amongst other eternal pompom wavers states that "In my posts, I concentrate on the future"...

However, looking at ANGS's entire record to date, literally every single promise, assurance or prediction of jam tomorrow issued by any version of the ANGS BoD via any means (whether RNS, interview, presentation or PR puff) has turned out to bear no relationship whatsoever to the cold, hard reality of things.

Little wonder then that the cheerleaders are so insistent that people only "look to the future".

Simon, I'm fairly certain that the Balcombe decision will go in ANGS's favour. However, I sadly don't expect that to make much difference.

Aaah, Onetomany, this BB's latest Mystic Meg is back, with "jam tomorrow" assurances about Balcombe now.

Readers might be well-served to recall that it was Onetomany who assured everyone three months back that the ANGS SP would be at a minimum level of 1.5p by the end of March... so perhaps best not to pay too much attention.

I'm suggesting that LSE reports trades, but guesses whether they're buys or sells.

Yeah, REALLY impressive. An eye-watering loss, once the irrelevant of phantom future hedge reconciliations has been taken out of the equation.

As to "all the buys this morning"? Presumably you mean the pitifully small c. £11k's worth of alleged buy trades?

Hold the front page... not.

Aaaaah Onetomany. Hardly a surprise, but he's turned out to be not exactly the most accurate of fortune tellers...

Let's see what he was assuring anyone naive enough to listen just three months ago.

*********************************

Onetomany

Posted in: ANGS

Posts: 239

Price: 0.50

RE: Positive indicators 5 Jan 2024 14:35

Barney I think once funding terms are clarified and signed then that in itself will have a major boost. Gas I’m expecting to reach 120+ over the coming cold months and a storage partner update also due within Q1.

Take a look at the CPR and the many references to it by the BoD. End of March I expect 1.5p if not more. It’s all upside from here.

*********************************

So... 1.5p? Nope.

I think the correct word, as the ANGS SP hovers within a gnat's wing of a 52 week low, is "Oops". I mean, far from trebling (the SP was 0.5p when Onetomany made his bizarre prediction), it has in fact dropped a further 30%.

But of course, he's already rushing around telling everyone that he's busily averaging down on this superb cast-iron 100% racing cert money-making opportunity...

Nero fiddled while Rome burned and the Ocebot frantically attempts to spin while the SP slides ever downwards.

Desperately quoting meaningless platitudes spouted by any of the Angus BoD at the recent Investor Presentation is utterly pointless. Why should they be any more credible than any other statement, assurance pr promise that ANGS has ever issued, including those stated via RNS?

It's very hard to fool the market - and it looks like it's made up its mind. Watch this (blank) space.