Fly the 16.69p was posted on the Financial Time a few years ago not longer after the SP rose from 0.05p to above 0.70p. However a lot of people, included myself, cast doubt on its validity and believe it was just produced by some algorithm the FT used based upon the previous SP performance rather than actual business fundamentals. It shouldn't be referenced at all now, especially with the business performance since that time.
People should not be so fixated on the number of shares in issue. You should be focusing on the number of shares issued since the RTO and the subsequent dilution amount as a percentage, not the numerical value. We know we have been diluted around 34% currently and this will only increase with the warrants issued. But that is small compared to some companies out there. I gave an example (when someone requested one) where a company completed a placing doubling the shares in issue and not long after the SP went from around 1.7p to over 8p so the dilution doesn't not immediately mean the company is going to fail and PI's will be diluted to oblivion. The funny thing was after I made this point the individual who asked this question couldn't accept I gave them what they asked for a still went back to arguing over the number of shares in issue.
Brass, if its annoying you so much then stop reading this BB all together. I mean what's the point putting yourself through this if your not invested right, let along reading it every morning when you wake up. very odd behaviour..
Please don't mention him. Now he was a big ramper that moved to twitter, hut then sold out andcstarted slating SYME. A good lesson why keeping quier is best in case things don't pan out.
I'm not, end of the day the RNS was another step towards the first IM. But as many enjoy pointing out. IM has not commenced, but far from the doom gloom / can kicking many are trying to portray.
Buysellrepeat - a comment from Lavrov was very telling recently. It was something along the lines of that the US should return to silent diplomacy. Aka stop leaking things to the news and reporting it.
Luv that is not an assumption you can make. Danny on twitter used to be a holder, sold out a while ago abd began attacking the company. He then poster on twitter a screen shot of his holding showing he had just bought £42k worth of shares for a quick £800 trade. Karma came back and bit him hard as he then proclaimed to be taking a break after a large loss on another trade.
Only had to read the threads title to know its author....nut case.
Your basically saying every account on Twitter is a fake then. You must really live with a Tin hat permanently on your head. As for threats about people getting banned from LSE for posts on there. All I have done is post pictures of your very own contradictory posts. I would like to see what part of the LSE BB rules this violates, I am very well aware that posting links to twitter or any other social media platform is against LSE rules which is why I never do it and I know you have taken pleasure it catching others out for it. If I did get banned, that would speak more about the the LSE moderators and could be construed as being complicit with certain posters like yourself on this board trying to disrupt discussions and working to get people banned intentionally.
You by far posts the buy/sells rations FAR more than anyone has so that is pure *******s from you. (added to the ever growing list)
I am sure there are plenty of dodgy profiles on twitter. It was the big reason Musk has walked away from its acquisition as twitter wouldn't hand over the information regarding the volume of fake accounts. But when I posts screenshots of your very own posts from LSE which contradicts yourself, everyone can see the proof with their very own eyes :)
Castle no one listens to you. Everyone knows the buy/sold figures on LSE are not accurate. I have as already outed you as a liar. You could well be right in the SYME fails, but you have zero credibility, proven liar so its also likely you are lying about your intentions here. You fit in well with danny, he's not so bright either. Tweeting to the FCA about syme being a scam and yet he has a public profile of him attacking syme and then yesterday openingly admitting to buying and selling SYME. Some might argue thats market abuse and was trying to get the SP to drop for a trade. I wouldn't be trying to draw the attention of the FCA to that ;)