Member Info for Havoc3852

But if they do have another company lined up, why unsuspend trading of the shares? That doesn't make sense IMO.

I agree its not a good look for the company, but when we are so far down I expect a lot of these individuals don't care how it makes the company look due to the severe lack of progress and therefore how the SP has fared. Any posts now by the company direct usually have the comments functioned turned off now as they know they will get a lot of abuse as things stand.

But on the other hand why are they promoting the company when as far as we have been told, we have nothimg on place apart from the 1.6m from last year and the only funding we know of is vechain.

As much as I enjoy seeing another blatant troll binned, doesn't help where we are at this time.

There are probably some PI who are. But that is their own fault, they chose to buy and shouldn't have listened to the unknown strangers. A learning curve for them if this does fail.

Firstly a lot of holders including myself did not believe this individual worked for the company. Especially when it changed from worked for SYME to being a contractor. 2 very different things. Secondly completed guesswork that he was formally this "Sage" individual and either way it does matter as we all wlays say nothing that is said here has any impact on the SP so making these accusations is pointless.

I remember that AGM well Lex and I actually questioned AZ directly regarding this. Had absolutely nothing to do with him not controlling the voting the rights but rather he wanted to see how the rest of the shareholders voted so only case part of his holdings. If you think about it, if he just cast the full lot in one hit then all shareholders would have known that if they opposed any of the resolutions it would be pointless voting and therefore discouraged voting. At least by partial votes it actually gave others a change to seriously oppose any resolutions - which we did not. I said this at the time you and your ilk were highlighting this. If you actually cared to know the answer, you would have made an effort to find out like I did. But surprise surprise you did not and with complete and utter bias you assumed it was for a negative reason, which as I above there was a clear logical explanation . Whether you believe what AZ told me is the truth or not is down to you.

Truth you and your ilk automatically assumed that it meant they were thinking of disposing of TF and many started to peddle that POV.

NS20 - the last agm confirmed to me that it was definitely option 2 which comforted me. However! I was not happy that they clearly knew of issues and this was never elaborated on until that agm when they got asked questions directly. So they do need to communicate better with delays.

Hi rocky i would disagree about the rampers being more damaging than the detractors, if anything they are both just as bad. Your comment "I was drawn into the unicorns and rainbows statements early on" makes it sound like you bought in based upon the comments of this bb and are blaming them for your loss.. You should know that no one should ever buy in based on comments on a BB and only via direct comms from the company. Thats why i bought in. Therefore the only people to blame for losses is the company, or yourself (if you sell out at a loss when if you held on you could have made a profit).

Rocky I don't think there is a single individual here who would argue that it is not a relevant question. It is extremely relevant and one we all want the answer to. However not a single person here knows the answer and only the company can provide it. The constant reposting of this question time and time again is pointless as we all know, therefore is just to disrupt this BB. At the same time, I agree around the very FEW comments about "our time must be coming" is based upon nothing but personal opinion. But again we all know this but the trolls take it as an opportunity to attack anything positive.

Which is bizzare bob as im still positive on syme. I just don't like the use of an anonymous profle on LinkedIn which is supposed to be a professional platform. Not just some other social media.

Plus it does make the author of that article extreeeemelyyyy amteurish when they refered to him as " London-based investment management firm" Fintech Investor. When all you need to do is read the bio and account name to see its just some PI.

Nothing wrong with his tweets. But its the creation of another anonymous profile on what is supposed to be a professional platform and he has tried denying it is him on twitter and the TG group. Thats what i object to...

Correct. I called him out on it and i got blocked. I'm pretty sure hughez is is alias here too as all he does is copy and paste his posts mintues after he tweets. Its people like that who really don't help things.

Well i have messaged AZ to seek clarification. I will let you know if i get a response but my view is that its not a done deal based uppn the wording.

JR is in GCG which is suspended pending an RTO. Dont really want his over the top/ delusions SP predictions here again.

The trades at 0.08 are T212 trades so they are at a higher price giving a false impression of a rise and fall in SP when its probably fairly flat. But thats what you get when you use a "no fee" platform like T212...

Until tye prospectus comes out detailing the terns of the RTO, fundraise, share consolidation it is impossible to guess really.

JR...gcg is a cash shell. No company chooses to become a cash shell if they have a successful and profitable business. If the RTO falls through and the company has to wind up the value of the shares goes to 0. Therefore any relisting is in the bods interest to recover some share value and any potential future job role in the new company.