Member Info for harley24

@adam, agree also - I have thought about and made my own mind up...

@Flipsome, I am sure if there were alternatives then they would have taken them - this was high risk and not many takers to offer such financial support. I do not believe that any of the BOD members openly thought - F..k it lets screw the P'I's... they used the available vehicle that they could to get us where we are now... Would love to hear from any financial guru who could advise differently..?

agree also Fourteen... yes I am down, but the board could do nothing else but do what they did! we are now in a stronger position as I said before and if people cannot see this...and the fact that they could well be on their to recovering their losses now, surprises me with their behaviour and spiteful words. this is not about enjoying losing money now, its about recovery losses and plus some - some guys here just want to stop when so close to the finish line... think about it.. GLA

are just driving the depression further - please look as what we have now re product pipeline. AIM is a vehicle for raising funds and they have used it to get what we have now. Don't get me wrong, I too am way under but I knew what the risk were and still are...but feel more comfortable knowing that we have something more tangible to go on as opposed to where we were a year or so ago. I still strongly believe that any new partners/JV co will want some level of stake in the company - I know I would if I was financially sponsoring!! If this is the case, it wont get flipped to drag the price down.. Also, any JV/Partner who is sponsoring a particular product would want the security that his funding will not be used on other products - this is where other partners join in!! So if I was sponsoring VAL401, I would want to make sure that VAL could go it alone on other products in its pipeline and that I would not want my funding directed to others.. so VAL would need to demonstrate that it has the facility to support other products until a JV/Partner is in place for others . e.g VAL201..thats my take and its a YES vote from me.. GLA

Scooby, I know...that’s what I stated..

In other words,they could raise at todays price of 2.8p ..or they could raise at 28p... and who would complain about that..

I doesn’t say 1p anywhere!! It’s based on nominal value...which is .1p I believe... do not suggest there will be a raise at any level as they are not raising yet!! And only if needed! Nominal value and market prices are not connected.. so if they could raise max approx 12m at today’s price.. also, if sp is at a higher level, they could raise more with the same number I shares.it’s based in market prices - took me a while to get my head round it.. so rns is just asking permission to raise if needed.. the email received from satu suggest its leaverage for negotiations... my views its security.. from my side, not concerned now, but for sure many will critique! GLA

Would a partner want some collateral in val..?? If you we ploughing millions in a company, would you want some controlling stake?? Seems a bit of sudden change and maybe this is part of concluding vals first big deal??... as I say, just a thought..

Agree, think many of jumped to wrong conclusion.. I am sure there will be a few discruntled holders sell off on Monday, but feel they could regret it.. probably drop but will recover in the days to come.. I am expect some positive news between now and the egm..

Heidhuncho, agreed...assuming no discount... and more if the sp is much higher..

My mistake... ignore - please report.. It's not my intention to mislead people.. just went through a quick learning curve having reread document.. apologies..

Agree, so could be higher then... therefore less dilution... still think this is a piddly amount that really suggest it's more ad a negotiation insurance policy...

It's maxed at 470k ish... equating 100% nominal value... that's it!! Small insurance policy... GLA and try and enjoy your weekends..

Or to a potential partner...think about.

Recruitment started beginning of the year and will be ongoing.. I also agree that there will be an ipdate soon as for sure some patients has received in increase in first quarter of this year.. 16 to 18 weeks initial feedback suggest quite soon to me..

Recall seeing that too... I believe was a last resort/back up plan.. if you talk to the company, nothing has been initiated in this regard, hence probably being removed from their web site.. meaning only one thing to me.. GLA :)

wayne, don't be so down... frustrating yes, but look at what we have now, we seem to forget what we have now and how close we are - this is the best time to be in VAL...

I believe they cant and wont due to conflict of interest... and more likely, not even needed!

probably moved sideways into another role as there is nothing for him to do at val - its all done :)

good point, but what will that do.? . David Lennigas seem quite active on social media - especially when there is a fund raise coming.. seems a more crooked approach to me... Re Tarquin, I have no idea what he is up to or even doing for VAL??? fortunately, he is not involved with the science!

some people forget what was mentioned on the last RNS... Agreed - It is really frustrating to have wait a bit longer and seeing our MC decline!!.. The last RNS was positive, but we seem to generate a level of negative opinions just because the BOD are not telling us what they are doing on a weekly basis - let them do their jobs and generate their fist licence agreement. The excitement exposed on the last RNS to me was enough to give me some relief... I don't give a F..k what Align are up to.. its VAL who I listen to and its VAL who should communicate what is going and when... getting frustrated daily will not change anything. VAL will inform us what's going on when there is some worthy news to share. In the mean time, lets not speculate and worry or jump to absurd conclusions. As I have mentioned before we are in the best position in the history of VAL..so just a little more patience is required - so far I have waited for years so to me a few more weeks wont hurt - just how we all deal with this frustration problem that we have - bashing the company or foreseeing the worst really don't help.. remain positive and remember why you bought into this stock.. Just saying - GLA