Member Info for HarChris

Sng communicates with shareholders far less than ncyt - bad comparison!

Org/Seb/Rob/insert name here, I too at times feel the abuse goes a bit far such as calling her evil Eva... but if you're right that she's just having fun and enjoying winding people up on here then you can also assume that she's expecting the reaction she's getting and most likely unfazed by it.

Eva, if you are hurt by anything said on here protect yourself by avoiding this bb. It will help you as well as everyone else and you've always got Org/Seb/Rob/insert name here to email - he's already stopped WWIII with one poster today!

Ade, let's see what tomorrow brings, share price movements are never exactly as you expect. Every chance this pushes on to 325 tomorrow and that would be a bullish sign for next week...

I just don't see this rising 20% in a single day right now, I see steady progress back up to about 350p pending further news - around 2-3% rise daily for a week would get it there.

Can we stop saying that Eva is some old man pumping anything he can get his hands on - it's evoking horrible images in my head.

I think I was a little concerned by how irritated he was by the questions. It's understandable that a man of his background is very proud of what he's built and so he should be but he should also realise that fast fashion is increasingly under the spotlight as climate change becomes a bigger and bigger issue. Some of the questions related to the business more generally, such as whether or not selling dresses at 8p sends a negative message to youngsters about the inherent value of garments and the textile industry, and neither he or the woman in the room were willing to directly address it. Kamani just kept repeating the same thing over and over again instead of engaging in a serious discussion.

They are operating within the law but if they don't take the environmental issues surrounding fast fashion seriously it will catch up with them at some point... perhaps put the CSR experts in front of the cameras and keep Kamani in HO.

I'm with streets re Kamani, was frankly flabbergasted with the praise he got on here yesterday. He couldn't string a sentence together and by the end I felt dread every time he opened his mouth.

I was however relieved with the way the press reacted in general and it's clear to me that there's little milk left to squeeze out of the boohoo boob. Andrew Reaney was impressive and this year couldn't have played into BH's hands anymore than it has with the pandemic and the on/off nature of the lockdowns which leaves high street retailers scratching their heads in regards to strategy.

So in the end I decided to top up as the sp is capable of gathering some serious momentum in the run up to the next results.

Remember I was the only one and one who bought SNG at 33P, sold at @2+

then bought back again at £2 and sold at £1.75
then further bought at sub £1 sub 90 sub 80
**************
My 'trading'record on this share, for want of a better word, is very similar to yours. Mine goes something like this:

Bought between 35p and 70p
Start top slicing above £2
Sold out on pfizer news around the £1.50 mark before slowly buying back around £1.10 downwards with last topup at 75.7p.

The difference with me and you? I don't think mine has anything to do with skill or intelligence. I played it safe a number of times and the share price went for me. I haven't put a fraction of the effort or time into synairgen as others on here and so I am a little less married to the share you could say which has helped in this instance.

You've done extremely well recently Eva but don't kid yourself that you're some genius investor - you're not! Your success with this share is thanks to the contributors on here and a lot of luck - same with me.

What would constitute earth shattering in your eyes ragtrade and therefore necessitate an rns? 50% rise in pre tax profit for Q3?

Yes it's a well known fact that all Americans wake up at 9.30am on the dot so expect the share price to climb from 2.30pm GMT as buys start coming in from the East Coast.

In the future if boohoo fail to keep to their promises they will court controversy once again but as long as there are no surprises in the next set of results this will be free to run now.

Topped up and will be looking to take some off the table at £5 sometime in 2021...

You and your ramps make me chuckle.

In my opinion it will likely rise because some investors will have sold out weeks ago with the plan to buy back in after this meeting - it felt like the buying back started today. Besides arcadia news I expect it to bob around between 300 and 330 before the next set of results...

I'm not one to **** off Guardian writers or Green MPs for challenging big companies. In my opinion big business will always have one goal and that's to make as much money as possible and any ESG will be a strategy to help in achieving that goal. I don't think anyone has it in for Boohoo, it's just the slavery allegations made them an easy target and someone to make an example of. The corporate world really doesn't care what left wing politicians and columnists think, they care whether or not funds are willing to buy and that the company makes money.

In my view the share price is less to do with the negative press directly and more to do with the potential pressure on the business model following these allegations. If boohoo can show that they can continue to grow at this level whilst only working with law abiding suppliers and with minimal environmental destruction along the way then the share price will continue to rise like it has over the past five years.

Not impressed with the responds to Caroline's questions, pretty poor in my opinion. Could have done with Andrew taking all the questions!

As we are one of the main suppliers to the the developing world via the WHO & Unicef I imagine this is a guaranteed revenue stream for the foreseeable future.

On a human level this is very sad to see.

... and the end of the bull**** scare mongering in regards to the Environmental Audit Committee?!

£400? That's madness, surely only those for which money is no object will pay that. As it happens I think £120 pp to fly is a bit OTT and exploitative.

Ha ha I don't disagree, £1.75 a share would be an insult.

Personally with the risk I've taken on I'd have to accept an offer around the £750m mark but I'm sure most on here wouldn't.

It wouldn't be giving it away for £1.75 it would be £370m - £1.75 makes it sound like big pharma swooping in with a twix and a j2o!