Member Info for haggismchaggis1

The new Detergent Warrior, having deleted his old profile and ALL POSTS, for some reason he refuses to explain to us despite being asked several times, now with miraculously better English overnight, how can it possibly be the same person writing the posts? It's a sham login as no way is this Derek posting, the English is far too good, even whilst trying hard to sound like him.

This subject of Extreme was done to death on here months ago when the new system was announced by Extreme E.

NOBODY realistically expected to see an AFC system at Extreme E, yet Detergent Warrior wants to make out everyone here is dim on here except him.

AFC has already got huge mileage(!!) out of Extreme E
AFC no longer needs Extreme E as it has all the clients lined up for the S Series, including ABB that paid for the first S Series to be fast tracked to production.
Clients are not waiting to watch an AFC system flash by on screen in a desert, they are waiting for ABB to sign off the S Series, making it a fully commercialised system.

Ignore this typical Detergent Warrior bashing AFC with irrelevant old, irrelevant news. Detergent Warrior, whoever it is writing the posts now, is a sham.

And 45% of $4.8Bn is a lot of money just at 'old money' Lithium prices. Work that out at a P/E multiple and ALL is still very much a multi-bagger.

"With current developments in the Lithium industry, the mineral resource has an indicated life mine of revenues exceeding $4.8 billion."

AFC will still be advised on who is interested, as VARD need to keep all parties appraised of progress so that they can plan ahead for potential deployments. AFC could easily advise in with the results RNS on that sales pipeline, even if they just say "Vard are progressing a number of vessel enquiries" or something along those lines.

Get things into perspective and it looks way better than looking at it as a glass almost empty.

"With current developments in the Lithium industry, the mineral resource has an indicated life mine of revenues exceeding $4.8 billion."

Sulphur from ships is the least the ocean has to worry about ....

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ocean-pollution-plastic-particles-microplastic-unprecedented-level-scientists-warn/

Pitlick,

Buying shipping vessels is not like buying a new phone. Shipping companies will take a lot of time doing DD, especially on a new technology vessel. The first thing they will do is sign NDA's with VARD, so that news can only be released when the buyer says so, as the buyer will want to control the PR for their own gain.

After that they will spend months working with Vard on the specific design features and configuration that they want on their vessels. Discussing pricing, maintenance, support, guarantees, etc.

I suspect VARD have a lot of clients reviewing the vessel that uses AFC Fuel Cells. Some might want to see a real vessel as a showcase, others might be more open to ordering early, based on their own emissions reduction ambitions, but might want it kept secret until the vessel is built and tested, in order to avoid any egg on face.

AFC currently do not have the 600kW systems to put into the vessels, all we know they were building is 100kW and 200kW. So any order would require AFC to upscale the 200kW system and build it, which is likely a 6-12 month task.

It would be great to see AFC advise that Vard have several customers interested in AFC based Zerocoaster vessels, as just one order would have huge implications for AFC. However, I would not get too far ahead of ourselves with something that could still take a while to appear, due to those NDA's.

BG,

I was on GBP/USD spread bet at £10 per point from 1.1000, took the cash at 1.2000. Very nice profit in a very short time.

I only do a SB when I'm highly confident of making a profit, which is about 2 or 3 times a year on FOREX. I don't SB stocks, as it makes far more sense to buy the stock.

I don't see us playing that game, as the dealing costs would make small trades like that cost way more per share. Plus, none of us are trying to buy or sell in trade volumes that would warrant us doing these small trades in the hope that the MM's play ball.

How fast can we put the first genuine zero emission vessel into operation?
VARD has developed a concept that is ready to order, and we have made the big leap to carbon-neutral fuel as the primary energy source.

https://www.vard.com/articles/designed-for-zero

https://www.vard.com/articles/countdown-to-zero-launch

** making them money **

Yeah, small fry day traders that don't have the money or kahunas to trade the highly volatile but much more lucrative markets like FOREX and high volume stocks, instead they sit on illiquid small caps like this, talking utter garbage in the hope that they brainwash investors into my asking them money.

** nobody dies from it **

I take it his point is that people drink Pellegrino and nobody does from it, and Scrubber Sulphur discharge is just a very tiny drop in the ocean in comparison.

https://nautiluslive.org/blog/2020/12/04/how-much-water-ocean

The con men will still be trying to talk it down all the way to October when the gas starts flowing commercially. The disingenuous Muppets must think everyone is a sucker for their fiction and mind games.

Interesting!

https://www.tradewindsnews.com/bulkers/scrubber-discharge-has-less-sulphur-concentrate-than-pellegrino-water-star-bulk-president-says/2-1-1417079

BB2,

Are you not concerned that his English has miraculously improved dramatically over that posted on his previous login?

To me it looks like someone else posting, whilst trying unsuccessfully to sound like him.

There's P/E and Forward P/E.

What the market will do IMVHO is give QFI a P/E ratio that reflects the potential sales of fuel to others, such as MSC as their trials will be running this year, but other power users too. 30x is fine when you consider the potential ahead, and quite normal for a growing small cap.

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/050115/what-difference-between-forward-pe-and-trailing-pe.asp

3 trades at 600, very odd.

"600 Apply resistance at the ASK to keep the price from increasing"

https://otc.financial/list-of-market-maker-signals/

Stating the obvious, but no Results RNS today (out last year on this date), so maybe Monday we will get that RNS.

Will we get an S Series RNS at the same time, or instead of the results, or an S Series update as part of the results?