Member Info for haggismchaggis1

Klunk,

Straight to market, as it will be the same stacks as the one on trial now, just with bigger cabinet, bigger version of the electronics and BoP. No need to trial it, just validate it at AFC HQ.

And as for sales, AFC are counting on its construction partners to push their hire suppliers to buy the systems and provide the same service that they do with Diesel Gensets. That is what we are waiting for, not for the construction companies themselves to buy hundreds IMVHO, the construction companies are just validating the products suit their requirements, do what they say on the tin, and are financially viable, which from the recent update is true.

If the Hire companies don't get their finger out and buy the hundreds that the construction partners will need, then those construction partners could go it alone and buy their own, but both AFC and the construction companies are hoping it won't come to that.

"Early H-Power Tower deployments are being delivered under commercial lease hire agreements which, at present pricing, delivers a capital pay back within two years. This model further supports early market penetration to end customers. In due course, we expect to grow system sales to traditional plant hire businesses."

BB3,

Absolutely. Future systems, they announced at the same time they would be building bigger Power Towers, but the originals were built to a specification based on feedback from the construction partners, so those will stay and bigger systems added. In the long run it'll be just like Diesel Gensets, several different power levels to suit different demands on sites. Still no tweaking going on, just expanding the range.

Southerhay,

Very true. AFC have cherry picked the companies that have the biggest potential for sales and are easiest to facilitate trials with. There's likely a load of companies too far away geographically, or with lower potential in the UK. AFC picked 3 UK, and Acciona for Spain but whom they already had dealings and agreement with, which all makes the trials a lot easier to manage.

Thongstring,

Nobody is tweaking anything.

The bigger Power Tower systems are on top of the existing one's not to replace them, they are being built to customer demand, but as proven by the feedback and leases for 2023 the existing Power Tower systems are fine for where they need that level of power. No tweaking going on at all.

And the S Series is not being tweaked either, it's being shipped to ABB for sign off.

Payday is not far away. Once that S Series is revealed, which can't be far away as far as RNS go, then payday will be here. And another payday when hire companies get ordering Piwer Tower systems as demanded of them by the construction companies leasing them.

So no it's not a bit of fun, and many people like me have very serious amounts of cash invested in it because we can see the £ signs in the near future.

TT,

Absolutely!

Enowa knowa that the AFC system does not need expensive lab grade 99.999% purity Hydrogen like the PEM system. They will know AFC systems can run on dirt cheap cracked Ammonia, are proven in harsh environments where they operate, have low CAPEX and OPEX much cheaper than PEM.

AFC just need to show them the S Series when it's signed off by ABB and they'll know that AFC has a big system for some of their requirements.

They will be in regular contact with AFC for sure.

"Mace to deliver major infrastructure improvements for Heathrow"

"Sustainability is at the heart of the framework and Mace has committed to reducing embodied carbon at the airport by 40% by 2026 against the industry standard baseline. The company will deliver five circular economy innovations a year and committing to 100% ‘clean technology’ (including zero diesel on-site) by the second quarter of 2023."

https://specificationonline.co.uk/articles/2023-03-14/mace/mace-to-deliver-major-infrastructure-improvements-for-heathrow

Put your money on them using Power Towers, including the bigger one's AFC are building.

MelvinAFC = FILTERED

Another multiple login crook trying to give credibility to their other logins, you couldn't make it up (although they could, as that's all they do, make stuff up).

FACT, no shorting of anything more than the minuscule one from the two bit con man Mr008

https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/data/short-positions-daily-update.xlsx

What utter garbage you spout. Nobody was shorting ALL back then and nobody is shorting ALL now except a clown called Mr008.

BP sounds like insect urine :?-?D

RJ,
The pull back was on the Jurassic and I think that was because the Tanz Gov't told APT they want the known gas flowing, they don't want APT spending more time drilling into a deeper unknown target, they want production not exploration, so APT have put the Jurassic on the back burner.

Smudger,
The SCIR deal cannot be reversed, as stated by SCIR during their shareholder revolt, so makes no odds to when APT announce anything. I'm going for a guess of news next Monday.

Another AimM login? Or Garmoan? Or DW gang? Or??

Another one filtered by pretty much everyone for their disinformation garbage posts.

AimM also comes across like Ade, so that is probably another one.

That's the thing with the multiple login crowd, at some point they forget who they are, they are then easily sussed out, game over.

Glad I've had gitfinger and rupert filtered since not long after they started posting, as it detected something suspicious pretty quickly with them. Aim I've had on and off filter trying to work him out, but now back on filter for good, as he's given himself away, game over.

My belief is that the DW login is used by more than one person, and the one posting now is not Derek because the English as far too good, plus they have so far failed to post some of the regular things he was always saying for example 'said so' which he posted a lot, but has not posted once in 50 posts on the new login, and now there's correct English instead such as "when I said Extreme" where it would have been "said so..."

Mucker007,

Looks like you have far more to complain about with ITM (which BTW I also hold, and so I know all about it's issues) going nowhere for the next year or two, as they sort out their issues with poor past builds costing them money for maintenance and refurbs, and their lack of true production ability to fill orders they have been accumulating for years.

Anyway, no point directing posts at me, as you're filtered. I really can't be bothered with yet another one posting baseless fictional claims against AFC (because they want to buy the stock at a lower price I guess).

Ignore the con man shorter 'Mr008', his so called 'charting' is just plucking numbers from the air. Ask him where his chart is, he does not have one, he wouldn't know a moving average if it fell from the sky and landed on his head.

Here is my chart, showing the long term trend (the blue lines on the highs and lows), which I fully expect the share price to move back into. A close above 29p before end of April is all that is needed to get the price back on track, and as you can see by the upper line, the high could be a long way up from 29p.

https://ibb.co/9ZKGjmm

RJ,

It's a fair argument to suggest they might wait to roll info into one RNS.

I suppose a lot depends on what the NOMAD advises. The location of CH-1a isn't anything to do with the testing of NT-2 though, so that's a reason to do separate RNS. As BG says, the 3D will give a much more exact resource estimate than the old less granular 2D, if so then that is a reason for a separate RNS. If CH-1a needs a new well pad then I'd say that could be a reason for an RNS (rather than the location itself) as it involves additional work to what had been planned.

Will,

So is it also a cryptic message to investors?

MSAR = effectively proven
bioMSAR = effectively proven

Either highly confident, or the Morocco trials are going well?

RJ,

I think they've pre-determined an RNS by saying results "will be available by mid-March". They can't really say that and then tell us nothing, can they?