RE: GS2 Sep 2015 15:06
@techni
In no order, but just as they come into my head. UTW either charges fees or takes a slice of savings it finds when it advises corporates, large and small, primarily on energy and water consumption/usage/efficiency. It is part price comparison, part smart tech, part standard cost benefit/inertia selling.
1. Profitable
2. Cash generating (strip out the investment in futures)
3. 30,000+ recurring corporate customers and growing
4. Fragmented space and a consolidator
5. Neil Woodford has built a stake of 26% since he set up on his own. Long time fan and went public recently about his due diligence here (see below). He has it as a significant stake in both his funds.
Not all is great however.
1. Revenue recognition is aggressive but acceptable (better than QPP anyway).
2. Penultimate results were short of expectations with the excuse being that UTW was taking advantage of an opportunity to secure ... etc etc
3. Last results were short of expectations because.... guess.
4. However after this Woodford increased his stake exactly enough to force an RNS (i.e. effectively restated his confidence).
5. 3 above was compounded by the half year results being announced in the heat (chill) of China which triggered a fall from the 220's to the 150's. UTW has no exposure there at all.
I suspect that we will see a new FD at some stage as disappointing the City twice in quick succession is a no-no and smacks of poor forecasting.
Nevertheless, for a profitable, cash generating, annuity business, that is growing quickly, in a consolidating space, with a top quality long term ii backing it to the hilt to be on its current p/e is imo criminal. I think the sp is resting on a solid support level and so it looks a roaring buy to me. There was an interview yesterday with the MD at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTvI7Y9WsyM&feature=youtu.be - (first posted here by ddon1808) which might fill in some gaps.
Oh, present company excepted, there are a couple of fairly sensible investors on this bb. They may add quality to the above.
Love to hear your views
GS