Member Info for Gray1

You brought it up just wondered why it had bothered you no need to be offensive.

You got a degree in chemistry then? It was Analytical Research different to just Analytical. The Research part involves much more than just analysing compounds etc. Research involves creating different chemicals and compounds and then testing them to see if they do what you want them to do much more complex.

What is your interest in it? How does it make you feel?

No idea does it upset you?

Enjoyed it lovely and warm in Tenerife you should try might relax you. I shall be back again in May. I haven't predicted anything about Starmer or Reeves I think they should stay exactly where they are for the next 3 years they are doing a fantastic job but watching Burnham should be fun as well. I find this government extremely entertaining.

See the Chagos island bill has been pulled asi another shot in the foot by Labour something they didn't have to do in the first place as I mentioned yesterday.

The jury service bill could be next another Lammy own goal. Starmer should sack him he is a liability. The despatch box where Cons knew someone had been let out of jail accidentally and he didn't know or if he did he lied at the despatch box was comedy gold as he tried to shout and bluster his way through it. Then his speech to a jewish audience after the stabbing where he was booed as they knew he was all hot air just a litany of disasters. Surprised he hasn't pushed for £5 trillion in reparations for slavery yet that he used to champion when he was in the opposition. Why do labour just keep hurting themselves? Oppositions don't have to do anything just watch the car crash unfold.

Some you get in business that personnel get promoted into positions they can't do. Lammy is that person. Popcorn at the ready for the Burnham saga. Politics is fascinating at the moment you never know what is going to happen.

Trump at it again with his disgusting comments about NATO and the Afghan war only country to invoke article 5 was US and the rest responded. He obviously doesn't do facts.

As for science I have a degree in chemistry and worked as an analytical research chemist for many years worked on some amazing products including pharmaceutical asi over the years.

Just because we are talking about cars doesn't mean we have no interest in science and politics you are allowed to have a myriad of interests in life. As for LLoyds you are the biggest culprit for not talking about them. What is wrong with discussing a different topic? No harm is being done. I don't mind asi opinions again we may not always agree but at least he can string coherent sentences together.

That was your incorrect interpretation they are very handy as potholes tend not to affect them which is what we were talking about on muddy single track water logged roads they come in handy.

Freedom of choice asi. Happy with what I have. Need has nothing to do with it. You don't need 3 properties but is is your choice to own them:)

There is if you go in them and don't know where you are going:)

I was driving in Lincolnshire yesterday in the pouring rain in the back of beyond single track roads but then I do have a 4x4 off roader :)

All that info on a phone not for me too easy to hack and lose or be stolen.

Drive slower and avoid them never had a problem with them as I don't drive over them you need to pay more attention to the road troublesome:)

It is asi but there were policies they didn't have to do and ended up u turning on them that is the point I was making which makes them look incompetent. If you don't have to do something why do it?

For example the pensioners fuel allowance they didn't have to do it or certainly not apply it to every pensioner as we have discussed before. Digital id they have been all over with this now they aren't doing it although it never made it to policy why waste time on it? Farmers tax poorly thought out in the first place. There are others they just seem to be very good at shooting themselves in the foot.

Chagos Islands they didn't have to pay to give it away the courts ruling wasn't binding and now may have to go back on it. Why put yourself in that position in the first place? Not great leadership.

Maybe it would have been better if they had the consultations first:)

Of course they were troublesome they have never made a mistake or been forced to change policy never happened.

Agree every government had different issues to deal with but some of the Labour u turns have been their own making some of which weren't even in their manifesto it is just incompetence of their own making.

Why did you vote for Labour then troublesome especially the well thought out bit:)

There will always be good and bad stuff in an economy as large as the UK asi. They still have 3 years left to carry on all the good work they are doing:)

Hopefully they will continue for the next 3 years as well as they have achieved in the first 2 years asi. Tories were bad so he has a lot to live down to but he is trying his best to do it.

Fair enough regarding your voting intentions asi you vote for you who think maybe the best candidate for you unfortunately many just vote historically for a party because they always have done or their parents did before them although that does appear to be slowly changing.

Of course he did STP. He is the best pm we have ever had country is flying economically, massive growth, controlled immigration, police on top of crime, no NHS waiting lists, net zero to deliver ever decreasing power prices, water rates under control and tax, spending and borrowing all creating a stable and resilient country and a massive house building program as well for all the new workers arriving.

Labour supporters must be overcome with euphoria as we drive towards the sunlit uplands. How much are you betting on them winning a second term? You will be quids in. Maybe put all your LLoyds profits that Starmer has made for you on it. What can possibly go wrong?