Member Info for Gray1

There is speculation troublesome because Starmer has brought it on himself. What did you expect? Everyone to pat him on the back and say well done? The silence from cabinet members was deafening. He has no credibility apart from the diehards like you. How can he be trusted to make the right decision? Got it wrong too many times. I suppose he can always sack another adviser.

Labour are in power troublesome (or hadn't you noticed) so will come under more scrutiny and any potential successor to Starmer will be discussed as they could be the next prime minister if the time comes they are replaced then that will change but they still have 3 more years to keep up all the good work they are doing:)

That is your opinion not the opinion of the site you quoted gov.co.uk.

He will be safe for now Harley no one in their right mind would want the job before the May elections.. See what happens after them

Surprised me as well didn't realise he had done so much.

"A PM that has introduced more legislation to protect women and young girls than any other."

You might need to revisit that as according to www.gov.uk it is Boris Johnson who has brought in the most legislation for women and girls.

The Prime Minister who has introduced the most legislation to protect women and girls in the UK is currently Boris Johnson. His government has taken significant steps, including the Domestic Abuse Act 2021, to tackle violence against women and girls, and has implemented various measures to enhance safety and support for victims.

www.gov.uk

They don't run the country and didn't appoint Andrew he is part of their family however they have removed him from public life kicked him out of his home and distanced themselves from him whether he will ever give evidence is another matter though.

Not a monarchist so don't much care how they administer their family and relations.

Starmer had the information to appoint him it was his decision. Doesn't matter what anyone else thought at the time they weren't privy to the information and it wasn't their decision. The buck stops with Starmer.

How can you support someone troublesome who appointed a man into the heart of government who had links to a known and convicted paedophile? Starmer has no credibility and is a dead man walking. He is fortunate that the rest of them are more useless than him.

Absolutely they have done well despite all the chaos and calamity surrounding this government well done to them:)

4 communications managers, 2 chiefs of staff resigned and a partridge in a pear tree. Of course it is everybody else's fault never Starmer's but they are rallying round him to save their jobs. McSweeney and Streeting up to their neck with Mandelson doesn't look good.

Just glad this is all stable and resilient hate to think what chaos and calamity would look like. Is there any wonder the LLoyds sp has taken a hit. Only been in power 18 months just one continual car crash now turning into a major pile up.

Very funny troublesome comedy gold:)

Takes time to remove him asi so he calls it before they can do it.

Not going so well now is it troublesome it was only a matter of time before they started to fall apart.

The problem is Starmer is the best they have got and his credibility is shot just shows the dearth of talent within the Labour party. Anyway it is fun to watch wonder what will be next?

Good to see steady and resilient LLoyds just grateful they don't take after this governments chaos and calamity:)

It is hard work we these two Harley they don't read what is written just fly off on their own tangents and narratives.

Farage wasn't an mp when Brexit came around therefore he had no influence. He wasn't in power .that was my point you missed it and talked about "power" in general which was irrelevant to the point made and now you agree he had no influence in it.

You say he ran away ran away from what if he had nothing to do with it. He wasn't even an mp.

I wasn't comparing those 6 years you was read it again you missed the point now trying to change the narrative.

I understood exactly what you had written you misunderstood the point by replying as you did again.

I don't support Farage

What are you talking about? We have a trade agreement with the EU. Do you want to tear it up? I never suggested we should. I told you what I would have done when we left. We signed agreements with EFTA at the time it would have been an easier transition than what they did. I explained it earlier not explaining it again if you can't read it and understand it that's on you.

We are where we are because the people in charge didn't understand the EU and how it works in the first place and that includes both remainers and brexiteers. That is why I would have chosen EFTA to give the country breathing space and time to unravel it as I explained that earlier.

You are so blinkered in your hatred for Brexit you aren't reading what is written properly.

Has Brexit been a success? No it hasn't many reasons for that. Has it been a catastrophe? No it hasn't. It is what it is work in progress. It was never going to be easy.

I also did say it came with constraints some of you really need to read and understand what is being written:)

In your opinion troublesome. You don't know that. I would have joined at the time we left it is too late now.

The clue was in the words "would have" past tense not now:)

Ok asi what role has Farage played in the negotiation and deliverance of Brexit? Was he involved in the negotiations? Was he even a member of parliament? Was he on any Brexit committees? What decisions of influence did he make in Brexit with any of the governments.

You have missed the point 6 years is a blink of an eye in time to make a comparison just to help you. Let's see where we are when we have been out of the EU for as long as we have been in it. You need to reread what I wrote. I don't care about the first 6 years in the EU it is irrelevant.

As for Farage and Reform I have never voted for them and don't think they will make much difference.