Member Info for Gray1

The only people that have trashed the sp is the incompetent management of JLP no one else. The fault is on them not on anyone who posts whatever on here. Meanwhile the sp slides further towards 2p. It doesn't look good as next year we are still only looking at 5 to 6K at best. Will that realise a net profit? Who knows.

After the Starmer clown show we have a new Charlie Caroli in Burnham and now Farage throws his hat into the circus. Politics the gift that keeps on giving:)

Just my opinion Shuvlin. I don't disagree with what Seis posts either.

I just don't see big leaps in production with the assets we have and the stage of their development i.e jumping from 5k to 10k and then 15K yearly etc we just seem to be moving up a bit at a time and it has been costly and time consuming to achieve even that. Communications are still dire really as I say we shall just have to see what happens next year but once again I think it will be slow progress with more shares issued for feed and paying off the LWP.

If Molefe has been this slow and costly how much will it cost to get G up and contributing if it ever does. They don't talk about that any more. It isn't looking good at the moment to make any significant profit.

I see Seis yes quite possible 900 tonnes a quarter could be achieved sometime during the year from Molefe. The front end has been a big disappointment at Roan Seis and we are still no wiser whether it can produce anything profitably.

Roan is definitely unknown regarding profit don't think there is much there at 3.6K tonnes a year net wise nevertogiveup. I expect the jorc to be delayed and unlikely to get it this year. JLP tend to go quiet on something when it falls short a bit like the updated copper forecast that never happened which means it must be bad. Just have to wait and see numbers for June could be telling and a guide for next year regarding Roan.

Miles away from 10k a year and 25k is a pipe dream at the moment and we are already nearer 2p than 3p.

The problem is Shuvlin Leon and JLP have given dissenters plenty of ammunition over the years with no real improvement in production of copper over the last 5 years despite copious amount of shares being issued and money spent on it.

I said at the beginning of this FY year I would wait and see how they have performed. It hasn't been great has it? They were never in a position at the start of the year to hit 5k copper and they didn't progress fast enough during the year to hit that target.

However looking at next FY they are looking better as Roan looks to be in a position to produce around 3.6k/year although not sure how profitable it is.

Molefe I have at around 1.8k for the year as it stand now however Seis has them at 3.6K so wouldn't argue with that so it is looking like they are in a position to produce somewhere between 5.4K to 7.2K for next year which should realise a small net profit hopefully.

As for the LWP I have given up on that deadline after deadline missed so if it doesn't come off I won't be disappointed but if it does that would be great depending on the terms of any agreement. Where the sp could go who knows but I personally only see it as a 5p to 10p share in the medium term and they still have a fair bit to do to get there particularly as they continue to issue shares whenever and wherever they can. See how it goes:)

It will be tough Mexico don't lose very often at the Azteca.

I am not talking about the sytem asi. Just because it allows this to happen it still doesn't take away from the fact he wasn't a sitting pm at the time of the election nor did he sign up to the Labour manifesto (he may do now). No-one knows his policies and therefore in my opinion (and not only mine) he doesn't have a mandate from the electorate. I don't dispute and never have that the system says he does. It's my opinion you don't agree fine. You don't have to agree with the system all the time asi. I think he is vulnerable because of this.

I was never arguing what the system is only you were:)

You don't understand asi because you are still going on about the constitution. I can't explain my opinion and why I think that any clearer. You are too blinkered asi and don't seem to be able to grasp that. I am not arguing with you about the constitution I clearly stated that earlier. Have an opinion on it.

"Do you think he would be better off calling a general election and trying to secure the support and mandate of the country where he can air the things he believes in and his policies and the electorate as whole can judge him on them."

What do you think? When I was referring to you using ai I was meaning leave it alone and have an opinion that's all. I didn't mean to be derogatory to you.

That comment was for STP about Burnham asi not you:)

I am not arguing the constitution with you asi you are missing the point. It is my opinion and my opinion based on Labour shoe horning a candidate into a constituency to take over the leadership of the Labour Party and then pm doesn't constitute a mandate from the electorate of the country in my book. I think it puts him in a tenuous position that is why I said he maybe better off whilst he has momentum calling a general election in the next few months that's all. You seem to want to argue the constitution to make whatever point you are making.

Get away from ai for a minute and have an opinion on it. Do you think he would be better off calling a general election and trying to secure the support and mandate of the country where he can air the things he believes in and his policies and the electorate as whole can judge him on them.

Asi Makerfield is hardly and endorsement for the country clutching at straws a bit there you just proved you are missing the point by that very comment when even constituents who said they would support Reform voted Labour to get rid of Starmer hardly an endorsement of Burnham:)

Accept what reality? I don't support Reform just commenting on the situation as I see it. Have you accepted you were wrong about Starmer yet and now pinning your mast to Burnham good luck with that. He isn't the Messiah you think he is:)

Whilst the party may have a mandate from the electorate he doesn't as he will be the new party leader which opens him up to criticism my original comment stands whilst he has the popularity and the momentum it maybe a better time for him to call and election within a few months it maybe his best chance of keeping the Labour Party in power especially as the right is fractured and short on policy particularly Reform rather than trundle on for another 3 years and gamble he doesn't lose that momentum. Just my opinion others may differ.

I know asi you are missing the point. The leader of the party plays a significant role in getting the party elected and as Burnham was neither an mp never mind the leader of the labour party he hasn't been endorsed by the electorate in an election which makes his position tenuous with the electorate particularly as no-one knows what his policies are.

I am not debating the rules just passing comment in how he will be perceived.

In a lot of constituencies asi the masses vote for a party it doesn't always matter who the representative is so having a good leader can be important. A number of years ago they didn't used to put what party someone was affiliated to on the voting slip maybe we should go back to that:)

No idea asi just making the comment whilst he is at the height of his popularity (within the Labour Party) it maybe better him taking advantage of it now rather than waiting for 2029. It may not make a difference but at the moment he has no mandate to run the country from the electorate and no one really knows what he stands for. He is on a hiding to nothing as it stands:)

STP ready to admit you called it wrong on Starmer:)

And no I didn't the oil blockade forced Iran to the table I was 100% correct:)

Seriously STP to go from 5 mps to over 325 to form a government in one parliament was never on. However they may get around 150 to 200 mps which I posted previously and it would probably make them the largest party as it stands now.

Depends on your Messiah Burnham and what he does the ball is firmly in his court now. He will have a honeymoon period for about 6 months which is when he should call a general election if not then it is highly likely Labour will just flounder along until 2029. We shall see:)

He has his chance now Dorfan. There will be a honeymoon period for him. How long that lasts will depend on what he says and does:)

Yes asi Starmer was pretty poor as a leader but he was the best they had. The Labour Party believe Burnham is the answer to their problems and will save them. We shall see:)

If the USA stop them having nuclear weapons that is one country less without them that is a win for me all the rest is smoke and mirrors.

STP

How did I call Makerfield wrong? I said right at the beginning Burnham would win I think you are mistaking me with someone else and Iran deal isn't finished by a long way just yet see what happens with the nuclear weapons until then no I haven't been wrong on either. The oil blockade on Iran brought them to the table stop listening to Iranian propaganda they have their audience to play to. How else do you explain the Basij have been protesting as they see it has a surrender deal by Iran? Different aspects to both sides. There isn't a deal as yet just a 60 day ceasefire whilst they thrash out the details although allegedly the Strait has reopened on both sides.

You willing to admit you have been wrong about Starmer?