Member Info for Gray1

Depends which side of the fence you are.

I am assuming he believes Iran because of their state sponsored terrorism of Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis etc and the possibility of Iran getting a nuclear bomb knowing their hostility to them he has to take the action he is taking to protect his country and people. I don't believe he wants war as he certainly doesn't want missiles raining down on Tel Aviv maybe he sees this as a chance to end it once and for all.

I have no idea whether it will work at the moment it looks unlikely so could have made things worse. It would appear negotiations were going nowhere.

However none of us are party to what negotiations they were what was on offer and whether the parties were negotiating in good faith. We do know the Iranian regime is bad. Pretty much all leaders condemn it so what does Netanyahu do? Can he afford to wait for Iran to get a nuclear weapon or until they get 20k ballistic missiles to saturate Israel air defence? Would you like to be in Netanyahu's shoes? I wouldn't having to make the decisions he has to. He is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.

It is alright other leaders calling for restraint and negotiations but they aren't in his shoes and it isn't their country which is being targeted by Iran and its proxies.

Now Iran may claim but we aren't building nuclear weapons and we don't sponsor terrorism (they would be lying about the second part) so how can they be believed about the first part? They don't let the IAEA in to monitor it and why would you enrich Uranium to 60% 400 tons of it.

It is a mess troublesome it is a shame Iran won't come to the table many Arab countries have accepted Israel. It would help if as Harley pointed out Israel would stop taking settlements and hand them back. I think Israel are making a mistake there. I don't know the answer but one of them is going to have to give up something or we will be back here again.

What about Netanyahu?

13 mins to reply troublesome hardly forever. Why shouldn't I watch the racing I enjoy the Cheltenham festival and backed the winner:)

I don't agree with some of what he says however:

I don't believe there is such a thing as islamaphobia it is just a made up word might as well have christianophobia etc

I believe some Muslims know how to play the victim card and use the system to their advantage particularly in the UK and where they form a majority in certain areas. The grooming gangs are one example.

I condemn the Iranian regime no idea what STPs opinion is though

Again with Huntley no idea what that is about.

Won s o d all on the last race but let the wife pick that one.

Good for you STP I take it back.

Where in my comment did I mention Iran STP?

He is claiming the extermination of jews in the holocaust was victimhood which means wanting people to feel sorry for you. I believe that is ra c is t as the jews certainly didn't play the victim card when they were exterminated by the Germans

I was watching the racing.

I thought they were bombing them because they are terrified they might get a nuclear weapon and they continually sponsor their proxy terrorists in the area to attack them nothing to do with the Holocaust.

Go back and look at my original comment I never mentioned Iran bombing in relation to the Holocaust. So no I don't think that and you are just making excuses for him. Keep deflecting though.

Why am I not surprised.

When you give your answer I will give you mine. Stop deflecting you know exactly what he meant he is anti-semitic r a c is t but you carry on defending him makes you as bad as him

You have done well so far I am £120 up will be there on Thurs and Fri. Not looked at the gold cup just yet will decide on the day.

Have you got one in the next race? I fancy Lossiemouth but odds are rubbish so will look for an each way a bit longer odds

That isn't an answer troublesome STPs comments agree with him or condemn them? Simple question should be quite easy for you given your stance on r a c i s m.

Mine was 6th Harley nowhere just back JP Mullins horses:)

Yes and you should still call him out for it as you have done to others and I didn't ignore others I just picked the jews as they were the largest group to suffer at the hands of the Germans. Why did it matter why I picked them it still happened to them didn't it? It was true I didn't ignore others you condemned what happened to them and pointed out there were others I agreed with you and condemned it also. Then we got STPs disgusting post.

I still stand by STP is anti-semitic ra c is t and you abhor ra c is m in any form and yet didn't call him out for it. It shouldn't need me to tell you what to do as you have been particularly vociferous when you perceive r a c is t comments.

He is r a c is t forensic and troublesome the board r a c is t police can't even call him out for it.

On Iroko for the next one:)

I was on Saratoga as well harley £20 each way nice £240 win makes up for the loss of £80 so far:)

You really are anti-semitic STP you call what happened to the jews in WW2 victimhood? You should call him out on that troublesome disgusting statement.

Yes troublesome there were others and that was terrible also

I wasn't discounting them just that the jews were singled out for the final solution they were mainly exterminated because of who they were.

Do you think if countries who have nuclear weapons abolished them but then in the event of a war between them would the same countries then rush to produce a nuclear weapon? It's a question asi not a statement.