Member Info for gotreal

Member Info for nevertogiveup - member since 10th July 2025. Where has this one sprung from? Somewhere where the indefinite articles "a" or "an" don't exist, that's clear. Gems of wisdom include:

"Copper is industrial metal in abundance in the world ... can be produced fairly quickly with adequate investment!!!" Hmmmm No, it takes 15 years to open a new mine and ore quality is decreasing meaning traditional producers having to process vast quantities of rock to extract the metal unlike JLP....

"There is no guarantee that there will be oversupply of copper within next 2 or 3 years." There are few guarantees except death and taxes....

"Global instability is slowing economic growth and demand for copper will be muted." What an amazing crystal ball you have ....

"Current price by COMEX in USA is not sustainable. Jubilee is delivering copper to LME with price tag of $9800 per ton, much lower than in USA." Why is this relevant? Copper at $9,600/t is a high price.

"Price of copper in the future with be erratic and manipulated by China as they are accumulating copper at the moment." No point in commenting to this....

Sheesh ....

Chattings**t.... "In contract law, an offeror is the party that makes an offer to another party, known as the offeree. The offeror initiates the process of forming a contract by proposing the terms of the agreement. Essentially, they are the one proposing a deal. " You should educate yourself .....

"The PROPOSED transaction WILL be conditional on, inter alia, shareholder approval, regulatory approval, satisfying any change of control requirements and entering into Definitive Agreements. "

Principle

Traditionally, contracts which contain an agreement to agree certain contractual terms in the future have been held unenforceable as being too uncertain. The existence of a binding contract is determined by an objective test, which is whether on the basis of the evidence, the reasonable man would say that the parties were in agreement and had intended to create legal relations (the test disregards the parties’ own views), and the contract is sufficiently certain so as to be enforceable

The binding offer is binding on the OFFEROR only.

4everlong: "Whether the board had accepted the offer AND agreed to penalties if not accepted, is not reflected in the RNS. I certainly hope they haven't." They cannot do this ....it requires shareholder approval.

You should write fiction with an imagination like that Bluebelly ......

Bottomsup .......Look at the LME price NOT the US High Grade copper price! The COMEX price is irrelevant to us.

Welloil .... Chris Koen (MBA) Head of Mining - Zambia - Jubilee Metals Group "I present myself with 29 years mining experience in many different mining applications." https://www.linkedin.com/in/chris-koen-mba-4a5a09229/

Leon CANNOT accepted an offer without shareholder approval, which is highly unlikely to be given with PGMs rallying as they have. Tharisa reported on their last quarter this morning: "The PGM basket price, a weighted average of the six key platinum group metals, rose 10.8% to US$1,574 per ounce. At the same time, metallurgical-grade chrome concentrate prices jumped 24.7% to US$293 per tonne, largely driven by renewed demand and inventory restocking." https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1074376/tharisa-reports-steady-progress-in-q3-production-but-trims-guidance-1074376.html

welloilbeefooked - they have already said they are looking to partner with a mining company, to effectively sub-contract that aspect of the operation but it will not mean we are dependent on the mining company to supply the feedstock, as we are in SA, as we own the resources already and are looking to acquire more. That is the key lesson they learned in South Africa.

Bottomsup... that is the COMEX price in the USA.... we get LME.

"would likely not be considered libellous...." 😉 Tread carefully....

Suggesting that someone is corrupt could potentially amount to libel if it meets certain criteria. Libel is a form of defamation — a statement that harms someone's reputation. For it to be considered libel, the statement must:

Be published: The statement must be made to a third party. It can be written, spoken, or even made via digital means like social media or websites.

Defame the person: The suggestion or statement must lower the person's reputation in the eyes of others. In this case, suggesting someone is corrupt could damage their professional, personal, or public reputation, especially if corruption implies dishonest or unethical behavior.

Be false: The statement must be untrue. If the statement is true, it is not considered defamatory under UK law. However, truth must be proven in court.

Be made with fault: The person making the statement must have acted with some level of fault, which could include negligence or malicious intent. If someone makes an untrue accusation recklessly, or with the intent to harm, this could contribute to a successful libel claim.

Tread carefully, now.....

You write what you want Chat.... only you will be liable for it. Suggesting the board is corrupt is a good way to test that....

But that's not what you said is it?? You postulated that Leon might dispose of the copper business without shareholder approval which plainly he couldn't do. And you also claimed there are too many shares in issue without giving any reason why, given that it is common place to have billions of share in AIM companies. Trying to deflect away from those stupid claims doesn't negate the stupidity.

"Imagine the copper gets an offer for 3p AND LEON takes it. That would be about 70 to 80 million." I am dumbfounded that anyone posting could be this stupid.... So, HDs, you think Leon can do as he pleases without shareholder approval? "Leon really needs to get the share count down. 3.15 billion shares for a start up copper business is just way to much!" Why?? Multiple AIM companies have multi-billions of shares in issue.... it isn't an issue. Explain why you think it is.

Edzi, making libellous comments suggesting corrupt practices .... and you defend that? 😁

Careful, Jonah..... you might be accused of speculating (wildly guessing) positively! As opposed to the growing body of libellous suggestions such as "We *need* the money to fund......an undisclosed black hole in the company finances." Or corruption "When the buyer is announced, it will be interesting to know if the buyer has any links to the institutional investors and/or board."

He gets paid enough. No more shares until we get a meaningful cash flow established.

The MMs want to panic the herd into running by quickly dropping the bid.... Sit on your hands if their tactics are making you nervous. Its classic MM behaviour in a situation like this where the volumes are so huge and so many are hoping to trade it. They just want the punters transacting; they don't care if you buy or sell.... but scaring people to sell by a quick price drop is their most effective tool.

A little tree shake .....

"Im going to report him" Ooooooooohhhh! Hahaha..... water off a duck's back for DL.....