Member Info for Gitfinger

Guess not because it doesn’t fit the narrative….

So no one is really bothered that according to documents in the public domain, Speedy own at least 75% of the shares in the JV……

Go to the tab marked "people" and these is a sub tab that says "people with significant control"

Click on that an you'll see that Speedy hold at least 75%

DUH!

should read JV

Anyone have any idea why the PSC notification in place in respect of Speedy Hydrogen Solutions states that the entity with control is Speedy Asset Services with a holding in excess of 75%? I would have thought that, if this changed with the issue of the new shares, then a new confirmation statement and PSC notification would have been made....So is it the case that the joint venture isn't quite as joint as we thought?

B3

We all knew that Alkamem, being the holy grail, was going to be a long haul, if at all, and anyone who expected it to be delivered in a short time frame is a deluded fool. AB is massively culpable, however, because up until very recently he has given the impression that it’s “current work” when in fact it was never such a thing, and he only came clean about this recently.

As for your comment about prioritisation, I’m not convinced, but I would like think that the towers of power will find customers in the near future. Given the fact that the company has geared up massively, what numbers deployed in say the next 6 months would you regard as a success…I’m thinking of numbers of units deployed on commercial terms , rather than sales volumes into a JV.

It looks like we are on the ascendant at last, which is great news, and hopefully its the start of an upward trend, which could lead to business growth (and hopefully share price growth, assuming margins are maintained).

However, there is one thing that really really makes me wish for the days when this ting was in the doldrums, and that's the incessant ramping drivel posted by the new incarnation of haggis. It's relentless, and is based on nothing other than a more than rose tinted view of his interpretation of the situation, and all it succeeds in doing is clogging up the board. When there is something to actually comment on, where there are facts to actually consider then happy days, but must we really suffer this continued onslaught of one sided, biased ramping drivel?

B3……told you I’d heard good things……

B3. Far more confident now… I believe the dots are joining up….i hear good things……query over the two liquid cooled. Versions was genuine as I’d be interested in what the key differentiators are….can you enlighten us?

You doubters are forgetting one big thing…..power from the grid is AC…..power from a fuel cell is DC…..DC is better suited to fast car charging, so foresee a deal with a company that makes fast cars…who happen to be leading the way with rapid charging (and I don’t mean musk’s film flam not for profit enterprise whose share price defies any economic logic)

Daz....Oh, the irony of it, you talk about health and safety within the context of gravity defying rides which are put up and taken down every couple of days....

I prefer "must have" myself.......

Jeez Garonne….and I thought I was picky about spelling, syntax and grammar…

So we currently have an air cooled S series, an L series liquid cooled, and a liquid cooled S series….anyone actually know what the difference between the two liquid cooled units is?

Daz…. Generic phrase used to cover disposals out of insolvent estates of both kinds…just cause it’s used doesn’t mean it’s right……I’m talking uk terminology as it’s a uk board talking about a uk company, but the states does admittedly have different terminology…

Noj…..and companies don’t “go bankrupt” companies become insolvent and go into liquidation, sometimes after a period of receivership or administration….only individuals “go bankrupt”

Noj……company’s?

Noj…..engineering might be your strong point, but English certainly isn’t……math’s…..indeed….

Time to average down, methinks......

Ade…multiple accounts….people in glass houses?