RE: Deals15 Mar 2018 16:18
KNIGELK, it was aidan who stated on his website that the key original acquisitions are still there and will now be completed by the new company. Do you understand what the word "original" means Nigel? I feel like i need to dumb it down for people such as yourself, people who continually take positives and try to turn them into negatives. And yes Nigel, you do that a lot and I don't think it's an attempt by you to be balanced, its an attempt by you to put a negative slant on everything, some might call it trolling? By "key original" one assumes we're talking about the original deals that were originally lined up for WRN. Which implies that the $2 billion nav quoted in the 2015 RNS may still have relevance because the deals which would have made up this figure, had those deals completed, were the ORIGINAL DEALS that AE was presumably referring to. So one more time Nigel, just for you... The RNS dated January 2015 in which it was stated that upon completion of the deals NAV was expected to exceed $2 bn... these were the ORIGINAL ACQUISITIONS that were originally intended for WRN. And according to Aidan, the KEY ORIGINAL ACQUISITIONS are still there and will now be completed by newco / Whetstone. Thus it would appear the $2 billion nav quoted by WRN may still have relevance - therefore, as far as I'm concerned, it is perfectly fine and on topic and relevant to continue to refer to the $2 bn nav. By "key original" my assumption is that not all of the ORIGINAL ACQUISITIONS may still be there, only the "key" original acquisitions, hence the reason in my last post i wrote my assumption that the key original acquisitions perhaps amount to 25% to 50% or so of the original $2 billion nav figure. Which is a fair and balanced view. If i was in any way "ramping" i would surely be predicting outrageous claims of �5bn Mcap and �80 a share - which i am clearly not doing. Re-read my last post again and it's a very grounded, balanced view - predictions of �1.50 to �6+ are entirely realistic targets imv based on what we know so far. As more detail emerges, obviously we can all continue to amend such targets etc. But for now, based on what we know, my last post is a sensible round up of what i personally think we might see regarding share price. And of course these boards are all about sharing opinions, posting sp predictions etc without having to put up with others aggressively barging in and labelling them as "RAMPERS" etc which amounts to personal abuse and is contrary to LSE t+c. Know anyone who does that nige?
Sign In
Follow the stocks
