Member Info for GarryParry

LOL.
Was there a ship in sight?

Funny company this. In the age of COVID and being a digital financial management products and software solutions provider - it reports difficult trading conditions!!

can someone pls advice on how do I go about calculating the 'original' cost?
I have a massive loss on this share (avg price 137p) but am hoping that someday it'll bear fruit.
I can now see that the last two zeroes are gone reducing my share holding. Do I simply add two zeroes to the new 'price' (e.g. 13700.00p)?

Can someone pls help me understand why should someone sell their holdings *just* as some good news towards commercialisation is coming in? Wouldn't those x million shares fetch a tidy return for RA as they would for any investor?

Puzzled......

Let us look at it objectively MP0818.
I have been a LTH and had given up on the company due to the Jam Tomorrow scenario.
Three things changed my perception nudging me to top up:
1. Licensing rather than only manufacturing approach
2. Extreme E
3. Being an assembler rather than doing everything themselves.
We have seen many false starts before, but with the new post covid world, with the emphasis on H2, let us hope that we will have more ££ coming in.

Someone asked Mr Brandon on using wastewater detection systems on aircraft. This was his response:
It would be impossible to retrofit on an aeroplane due to the lengths of time it would take to get through all of the safety protocols, so it can be used on removal from the plane after landing.
https://twitter.com/gjbrandon/status/1330579418557927425?s=20

Why not add TPG?

I wouldn't be too worried about 'manufacturing' capacity IMHO.
What spurred me to top up yesterday (am a long suffering LTH) was the declaration of the use of IP and licensing and assembly. In doing so, you don't have overheads, have ongoing revenues from licensing (similar to CWR) and rapid assembly from trusted suppliers around the globe.
If the Extreme E goes ahead in a sustainable manner with AFC within it, one can expect that the links to the motor industry worldwide would increase.
Existing assembly lines across the world can then be tooled up to deliver additional capacity as and when it is needed.
Looking optimistic from now on.

Thanks Surprised.
I have continued to be impressed with the scope and depth of TPG's portfolio of work. I am keen for them to succeed since they are in so many 'mission critical' areas.
Having read your post, I am looking forward to that being reflected in the revenue and the EPS as well as the NAV.
Thanks once again.

Not sure how TPG is going to capitalise.
They don't have manufacturing capacities (unlike ITM), patents (unlike Ceres) or focus (like AFC).
Whilst a very good company with a lot of scattered interests, I struggle to see where the revenue is going to increase? Is it only consulting?