RE: Leo Koot25 Jan 2021 15:41
When Directors of even Non-execs "leave", invariably they are always kept on to act in a consultancy business. It very very rarely happens that they are not. It is just terminology simple as that. I very much doubt Leo Koot will go anywhere near BPC in the future let alone do "consultancy work". Old LK probably wants to put as much distance as he can between now and the RNS issuing results. I would not be surprised if he has Big Si's number permanently blocked. I think it stinks Leo Koot leaving now at this critical and crucial point. Why would he, as he effectively gave his company to Potter & Co for nothing. If BPC had hit big on P1 he would have looked the hero of the hour to his former shareholders grabbing a nice piece of the pie on really what was a very much failed company with a SP worth virtually zero. I think he thought he had Potter stitched up like a kipper but having reaslised the big Aussie is not easily had over and P1 is woth jack he thought im out of here, I can't deal with this mob and dont want to be left on the P1 boat as it sinks into the Bahamas dust. I believe "Personal reasons" is a load of cobblers. The timing is awful yet again by Potter. I thought the Lombard funding timing was shocking halfway through the drill but the resignation of Leo Koot a week or so before the drill results beats even that. Finally, I would like to hear more from Chairman Schrader. Though on reflection there is almost certainly more chance of seeing Lord Lucan riding Shergar through the middle of Fred Smith's office than seeing or hearing of anything substantial than from Mr. Invisible himself. His contribution reminds me of Theresa May at the 2017 general election. Woeful and uninterested.