Member Info for fulmar29

So it looks very likely that HM will at least double in resiurce size,as predicted by GP and the RZ will add further value,So at lease 2.5m oz with extremely low AISC trying to be sold for £200m ?????????????????????????? apparently equates to "maximum shareholder value"

@Terrafin SSL said in one of their releases recently (to pacify holders probably) that they had plans to release quite a bit of info re marl projects quickly after the T/O (if it happens)

sell/hold or simply transfer the stock to another more able broker

it showed as an RNS and then disappeared

Now you see it ! ?

you need to contact your proxy holder via their secure site and instruct them how to vote on your behalf

Spud,EVERY shareholder can vote

Your argument would be bang on,had the purchase price been at all fair .£200m is massively under value as it stands,and gives absolutely no thought to the forthcoming news/results which will (if the sale goes through)further lift the SSL price but nowhere near the multiples that it would do to Marl alone Thanks for the Nevsun tip/they are now on my radar

Couldn't agree more Samewise,but it's still a NO vote from me.Vote placed already.

@Ludek,I think anyone who misleads shareholders,withholds information and feathers his own nest to the detriment of the shareholders that have paid his wages for several years would have no option but to resign.So it's a big fat ethical yes he should resign from me Bob.

@Zippy,I believe the boss of young man (Lee) who has been told to phone and slip in the question "may i ask how you intend to vote" (recorded by the way) thinks it may be more than tight!

Still voting NO Lionel.I would expect a retrace with a NO vote (possibly 65/70p),but as soon as we release the next resource estimate (now AISC is known) and Ergama drills,this will rocket.IMO.there are many other buyers out there,probably none though that will allow Glen to line his pockets so thoroughly.I think he should resign on a NO vote.

if this should happen(,and the phone calls tell me they are worried.)and because of his blatant self gratification-- Should Glen resign?

would you phone someone (man called Lee ?) ,saying you are from Mariana and asking about their ability to vote and then at the end of the call asking "CAN i ASK HOW ARE YOU GOING TO VOTE"?????????????????????,

I thoroughly enjoy your posts ,which are enthusiastic and informative.I can now see you have backed your enthusiasm with cash.You sure like a challenge,being a lifelong Rangers fan,I understand that.I hope your faith in KDR rewards us and our faith in Mr Holloway does the same.GL URRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRs

Guilty as charged--.last RNS new face of the Karalan family ?wonder who they are.

No,and they cannot tell you what to do.Only that it won't be able to appear on their platform.You will need to find another platform(of which there are loads)and have the shares transferred there.While you are at it you could transfer the whole SIPP .if/when the transaction happens,the shares will be allocated to YOU.They are only nominees.The deal as it stands is more than the Marl sp (today).But a NO will IMO be best longterm.

Totally,agree,I believe there is far more to gain here than to lose.USA is just another name on the screen.And it's still a big fat NO from me.Twists to come I believe.

thankyou crisp,we would need the £ to weaken after sale ,and longterm I don't think that is going to happen.Thanks for the correction.So we have been royally screwed in more than one way !

i am resigned now to the yes vote,but I am still a no,because I am voting for best value.(where are you Sprott?) However my point today is if the deal goes through and I receive Sand shares,I see HM and the other asset sales positively affecting the Sand sp,together with their own business model which looks very promising.Added to that if after the sale the pound (which is pretty low ATM) were to increase against the dollar (over time) that would also significantly increase the benefit to present Marl holders.