Member Info for fulmar29

Hello.Been watching this for quite a while now and bought in today.I know various news is due but my overwhelming reason for believing these gels will eventually be accepted are,"why would anyone take a tablet that affects the whole of your body when you can use an effective gel with no side effects, exactly at the point of the needed treatment" Logical IMO GLA

would it not be better to be on the SSL TSX page as it then links directly to the share page if held through ii http://www.iii.co.uk/research/TSE:SSL

SSL forum ? the only existing one that has any decent input I can find is CEO.CA .not quite as prolific as LSE but some useful/informed posters.GLA P.S. for what it's worth,my view of SSL is they will more than double within 2 years and possibly a lot more.(existing streams and planned streams excluding Marl would probably have put it at C$10 in that time frame

so am I gixxer,but not going to.too many eggs etc.Have put 25% of cash into shares and holding rest for an opportunity ! SSL maybe a missed chance but i eventually had 90% of my holdings in Marl.so was lucky once and I am not going to push it.

that's unlike you to split hairs Ludek .The NW/SSL meant nil capex effectively because payback is so quick.Even if marl had gone to the market for 50% of the cost then the payback would be so quick the only scale it would register on is the splitting hairs for non shareholders scale

looks weird ! and as I always thought it is priced in CAD,

was the price before SSL announced their widely criticized purchase (theft) of marl.and in that time NW has announced a further share buy back/bought shares himself and highly promoted his purchase. Had the purchase not occurred the SSL price would have risen anyway on the existing streaming/royalty projects due to happen in 2018,so short term ie this year the correction could well pass $5.40 and if NW gets his way with the EBITA ratio going past present ratings this may well multiply by the end of next year. GLA (we shouldn't ' have sold though)

with GDXJ/share buy back and general realization of SSL forthcoming and future streams I believe this will have increased at least 20% by year end and as Marl assets are sold/realized and the cash used for further buy backs /investments this will carry on rising until EBITA at least 6 to 8 times

so now we are told HM may have been sold for a quarter of market price salt/wound https://youtu.be/JCoWN6ljvlo and that is just what HM is showing at the moment--sleep well Glen !

to Q+A at the moment and it seems we would have had nil Capex as money is only due at year end which would have been self financing

I watched the latest q+a session last night posted underneath by terrafin which I think sums up why it was a "stitch up",there is nothing that NW is saying that wasn't knowledge before .No real capex needed /4 x SSL ebita which would have translated into a massive multiplication of Marl.BUT----we are where we are and looking at the scenario separately to my previous bitter misgivings,I am pleased to have stayed because a doubling or trippling of my already decent gain is not to be sniffed at.NW seems quite switched on and they tell me in Canada he is straight,but I am afraid with my experience of GP,I could never trust another CEO as long as I have a hole in my aperture .C'mon Ergama.!

Hi Lionel, Iread recently that SSL has a lot more negotiated streaming to start coming in over the next 12 months and the marl purchase will give them minimal debt.Definitely a t/0 target for 2018 with a steady increase in the sp until then IMO .I will have some of my shares held with LSE as they tell me this is possible,so presumably there must be a page for the price to be seen on so possibly to chat on GLA (excluding the BOD--me bitter ?)

my thoughts are that it is a simple explanation.The spin off is more like a sell off and ergama didnt get a mention because it is possibly being treated similarly to the early days of HM, with Lidya earning in by way of drilling and then a NSR deal (probably already agreed) all good news to drive the SSL price forward.

Lionel can't wait to see how they respond to "cordially" please let me know where you are.SSL will double within the year and if Erg performs it will do more IMHO Cordially F29 xx

As most on here are aware,I believe/hopr Ergama is the main asset and HM a happy but fortunate find.With a doubling of NSRs due to HM I believe that would more than double the profitability of SSL If Ergama proves up then that will probably get sold on for more NSRs--they might become my 3 favourite letters.

Hi Spud,posted at the same time--SPOOKY

I posted yesterday for the first time on one of their chat sites and I don't think they have a clue about what they have bought.I believe SSL will start an information offensive from the word go,to drive the price up .Previously I read they (SSL)thought HM alone would double their NSRs,so in order to get HM financed Lydia will pay top dollar,.and as soon as they are mining it is self financing.Then on to ergama ? GL to all holders,it's been emotional.F29

Thanks Gixer

not going anywhere either.SSL will do well IMO,but nowhere near as well as Marl would have,But heh ho! At least i can sleep at night.How do you sleep Glen ?

well I voted no !