Member Info for Fukurokuju79

Lots to play for here but I can understand why the time horizon doesn't fit some investors strategies here.

I'll hold a while longer personally but everyone has their own goals, methods etc

Atb

I'd imagine if Mike was at 3.13% then he will be below any reporting thresholds now via share issuance or certainly will be soon.

Lol Stan, bless you.

If you manage this badly at dot to dot then stay away from the paint by numbers.

Try get out in the sun this weekend and whatever you do don't attempt an IQ test...

Atb

I won't bother arguing as such MH.

It's more amusing than anything else.

It really is a reflection of those posting tbh.

The attitude, sadly, isn't one of open discussion but is of already formed opinions seeking to validate themselves....

The need for something's to be more than it is...

How could someone possibly not agree with me....

Anyone who doesn't agree is the enemy....

The world is out to get us....

I'm down in my investment (or sold at a loss and can't accept it) so it must be the CEO and in power cohort master plan (it can possibly be anything else)...

I'm sure bad elements exist in all walks of life but if I felt they were at the head of a company I'm invested in, I'd sell in a heartbeat.

I continually review investment cases and KAV is no different. I'm waiting to see what the drill campaign brings for now. Nothing more , nothing less. Until any further material news emerges.

Your right about largely not being bothered with this board anymore. It was much nicer before all these experts realised the company even existed.

Atb

😂

I suspect Catbert is either a cat lover who has a friend call Ernie or most likely is actually the evil HR director from the Dilbert cartoon.

Google told me this, and I've joined the dots, and I'm convinced. Look for yourself if you don't believe me. It's real.

Morning Mrs Marple. My account started when I opened it and I'm fairly certain more than one person was born in 79.

This entire concept is simply evidence of how toxic and conspiratorial people can be, with absolutely no base of fact. People see what they want to see, for their own justifications and bias.

Simply because I show some support for the CEO of a company I am invested in. I am that person because I don't use the internet to hate. Lol.

As I've said, I have had my own disagreements on some of the strategic decisions directly with Ben, as I do with other CEOs of companies I am invested in. The whole thought process of creating the link between myself being Ben is exactly why I engage directly with companies, and make my own personal evaluation.

These boards are not the place to obtain truths and facts. They can be used to help direct research and opinions and also help more rounded critical thinking, but for that too be effective you have to have the capability to weed out the points from the pointless.

Anyone entertaining this new theory of spin fall within the pointless bracket. Still it'll keep people amused for a while.

Atb

If you think I'm actually Ben you're more delusional than even your posting suggests.

Take care.

Yeah Stan my love for Turney, lol.

Your maturity is impressive. Go out and enjoy your half term off school, save this stuff for when you have to. Go build a den or something.

The drill is turning so time will tell what the conductor is or isn't. I'm glad they are drilling B1 and don't really mind what motivated them to do so.

Either way, good or bad, we (us shareholders not sure you qualify) have a choice we can each make. At least there is cash available to the company if it's bad, or we can reject the terms on second vote if it's good.

Sounds simple enough to me.

I have had my disagreements with Ben as much as anyone, I just choose to discuss them directly. If I don't like the answers, or the rationale I would simply sell and move on.

I could moan about it forever on here and not make a blind bit of difference and then make statements about others on here in a childish manner. I guess we all choose our own ways to express ourselves.

Atb

Could be any number of reasons why they transfer to that container but the point of having sufficient water reserves was as a lesson learnt from the last drill.

Does the fact you say the same things over and over mean you're a parrot?

We can all try make things seem black or white, but they rarely are.

Point being we all use our own judgement. On the whole I've decided that you're not a parrot. Until I see you I can never be 100%, it's a judgement based on likelihood, my experiences and knowledge (taught and learned).

Someone here may think you're a parrot. I would think that's insane, but I can't prove otherwise.

When is a parrot a parrot?

How many repeats does a parrot make?

How many can you spot?

Would you recommend the case your a parrot to a family member?

You get the point, probably.

Atb 🦜

AA will go at it like swiss cheese I think, but we'll see.

Anyway, have a good evening. Take care

Yes makes sense.

I knew I recognised your moniker. Are you still holding ARCM?

I'll brush up via those presentations re TiO2.

I was aware that Rutile has a better price and is less common, which is why I was pondering if it's likely. I was of the view its possible it could be a mix (given the grade may be too high to be rutile exclusively).

It will be interesting to see how this develops. I believe today's RNS was a step in the right direction and clearlyore drilling will be needed but the system seems to be proving very prospective.

It would have been easier on my brain if it was copper but we can't have it all.

Atb

Appreciated Dcat.

You've written that very proficiently and from a broader perspective it's what I had deduced myself, particularly in relation to the requirement for higher grades to accommodate economic viability from hard rock (given the extra crushing and milling processes over sands). That said I'm not particularly (or at all) familiar with titanium itself I must admit.

I've been around the block on mining stocks but I've had no exposure to titanium.

I'll have a gander at what you've kindly included as areas to read.

I'm optimistic about the broader system containing more copper and the potential for broader economic metals and minerals.

One thing I noted from the RNS is it said 'Preliminary mineralogical analysis of a small suite of selected RC chip samples has identified the common presence of several iron and titanium minerals including magnetite, hematite, and ilmenite as well as lesser rutile and chalcopyrite. '

This may be a silly question but we've been talking about the economics of ilmenite, are we making an assumption around ilmenite as opposed to rutile. As I say im a titanium novice and so it may be no assumption but it's something that has crossed my mind.

Atb

Didn't make it as not on telegram. Was there any mention it will be shared, as I can't realistically expect anyone to summarise the Q&As lol

You're of course welcome to your opinion Peggy, as is everyone.

It's worth saying though that had I stated those terms would be signed between ARCM and AA a couple of years ago, you'd have almost certainly said (and probably did say) its a fantasy. So, sometimes you have to accept that things aren't always as you see them when repeatedly offer a negative opinion about ARCM.

Clearly persistently sharing such a negative outlook on a board predominantly comprised of investors in a company will be considered alienating.

While you may have a point about people getting abuse by some where their opinions don't match, you equally must accept others have a right to a view different your own. And they may well be right.

The trouble is you choose to ignore some of the facts that don't support your negative view and bias (such as the above). I admit that this is not something you do exclusively.

It's important to be open minded but the deal is a great deal (the best I've personally seen a junior explorer achieve) at this stage. The fact it's not closed is frustrating and I agree Nick does in all reality use overly optimistic phrasing that does not help with expectation management. That said every meaningful factor other than the words Nick has used suggests this deal is closing, they have sufficient capital until that point, and it doesn't change the terms of the deal.

ARCM are in a very enviable place when this deal concludes. Especially given the prospectivity of their licences and given the reduced liquidity in capital markets for juniors.

Anyway atb.

Gla

Panda, you clearly have some opinions and research to share.

Why don't you just let it free, albeit I see the inference of your questions.

You question the commercialist and economics of the TiO2 with these sorts of grades and within hard rock (possibly with merit), but believe this is the start of unlocking the wider potential within the system (the copper is somewhere).

Ultimately, it's simply too early to tell until further analysis and exploration however I'm happy to continue to hold.

Lol

But I agree, riches to be had here.... Obviously that's the key take away from your post, right..

:)

Atb

They are sufficiently funded for more mapping and soil sampling ahead of the subsequent drill campaign. However clearly like all junior explorers they will need cash.

The copper values at surface weren't reflected in this drill results but as others have said they've only explored 2% of the system and it'll be there somewhere,IMO.

The Titanium from best surface and still present at 150 metres is significant and I'm sure they will have interest following the news today and given the results.

At this market cap it's very very attractive and so any capital requirements aren't a concern I have. They are a known necessity.

I've held here a while but don't post often.

I'm happy with today's news and I anticipate even better things to come.

Atb

You just so (ppm value/1,000,000)*100

Or shorten the function and do ppm vale/10,000

Atb

This drill is certainly an exciting event and let's hope it's successful in intersecting the anomaly.