Member Info for FTJNY

Addicknt - No need to wait for an answer as he is clearly on here to de-ramp either for personal gain or he is being paid by an unknown organisation to sow his seeds of doubt! Either way he is totally disingenuous!

Heaven forbid Stackhigh that I should wish an accident on you! No I thought that at the bottom of a sink hole you might find some of your bottom crawling friends so you would feel right at home :)

I have a wish - You get swallowed up by a huge sink hole and we never hear from you again! Now that woukd be happy days!

“The directors have made up their minds as to the direction of travel which is to go to production.”
What a load of tosh! You clearly haven’t read any of the recent comments by the likes of Sanga & Irwin who are now steering the ship. It is as clear as day that either Cascabel will be sold or rage whole of Solg and that will unlock considerable value for Solg shareholders. Suggest you either get clued up on Solg or get out if you clearly can’t be bothered to do any research! That’s assuming of course you are actually invested in the first place and not just trying to manufacture a lower entry point with your blatant de-ramping?!

Personally I would be disappointed with such an outcome given the known value in the ground at Cascabel and the massive upside potential across all of Solgs other tenements! But like others who have had to suffer years of jam tomorrow I have reluctantly resigned myself to such an outcome ( possibly in the 60’s but hopefully a bit higher) which would allow me to monetise my investment and use it more productively elsewhere! I hope I’m wrong and we have a ding dong battle between the majors for control of Solg which could result in something like a true fair value for what we have and this certainly isn’t beyond the bounds of possibilities. Whatever the final outcome it’s been one hell of a ride but IMHO it’s now coming to its conclusion! GLA

From current SP level
2 bagger - 34p
3 bagger - 51p
4 bagger - 68p
5 bagger - 85p
6 bagger - 102p
So if he’s distancing himself from top end of the above range maybe 68p is more realistic in his mind?

Goodmorning Copper. I don't dispute that but my point around Tesla is not about a single post but ALL his posts are basically de-ramping designed to trash Solg and sow negativity! Why is he here when he clearly has no skin in the game?

We all know you’re not invested in Solg so why are you on this board constantly posting your negativity? Of course it’s blindingly obvious that your de-ramping Solg either for personal reasons ( greed?) or maybe your a foot solider of BHP sowing their seeds of doubt amongst private investors in Solg to try and keep the SP suppressed? Either way your no better than a troll and I think it’s time you crawled back down the hole you came from!

That’s remarkably ironic coming from someone who has repeatedly and doggedly claimed that Solg were ( or are) going to production! Think you need to re-read the article Q as Sangha makes it very clear that all the bluster of going to production is exactly that - just bluster! You need to wake up and smell the roses lol

“For six years the biggest liability on SolGold has been Newcrest and BHP. They’ve talked down the asset,” Sangha told The Australian Financial Review. “This is a case study for junior miners as to why you wouldn’t want these guys involved in your project.”
Definitely a rumble in the Ecuadorean Jungle coming and my money is on Sangha and his baseball bat to give BHP et all a damn good pasting! Bring it on!!

By my rough maths Sanga could own around 4% of Solg if the merger goes through. He has around 110 million reasons to get top dollar for any JV or sale of Solg!

Just wait till the 6.7% of Solg held in Treasury after the Cornerstone deal concludes is sold to another Major ( or the Japanese / Chinese) then you’ll really see some smoke coming out of BHP’s ears! Karma springs to mind and it can’t come soon enough! The time has come to push back against these bullies and remind them they aren’t running the show!

Much better than De- Ramp ramp raaaaaaaaammmmping.

Speaking of odious characters try having a long hard look in the mirror and a mighty big one will be staring you in the face!

How hypocritical! You spout on about people ramping but looking at your posting history you have a clear agenda to Deramp! Not sure whether its paid or for personal gain either way its so disingenuous and you need to be called out for it! So before you go throwibg accusations around go and have a good long look in the mirror!

Let me guess! You wet your nappy and po£ped in your pants so your Mummy had to CHANGE you? Am I close?

Hope your right! Glad you called it right on those Black Swan Events. Sadly I didn’t but hey that’s investments for you - some you win and some you lose! Hoping Solg will help redress the imbalance and make me a tidy profit :)

Ha ha :) Wish it was MF. No the plain and simple truth is that a number of years ago I was heavily invested in Lloyds Banking and had just started posting on this site so I chose the moniker FTJNY which at the time was Lloyds corporate strapline in their advertising “ For The Journey “
Boring but sadly true as were my losses in Lloyds when we voted to come out the EU which was ironic as I too voted to leave so maybe I should have paid more attention in my own convictions and less to the press which were all saying we would never vote to leave! One of my life’s more expensive learnings but at least I’m still carrying forward the losses on my tax return so MAYBE one day I can offset them against a stonking big profit! Hmmmm now where could that come from ?

Sorry Woody it was me speculating if the reason for the pulled ( or failed) fund raise might have been a bid subject to DD and a confidentiality agreement? The overwhelming consensus was No so not for the first time have I been barking up the wrong tree but I felt worth posing the question :)

I have been thinking about the recent fund raise which was pulled ( or failed) depending on your point of view and one scenario I feel worth considering is one where Solg tried to get away another Royalty deal (along with a limited equity raise for the regionals) but the royalty element provoked a response from BHP who decided enough was enough and put in a bid either for the whole company or a JV? Either way in such a scenario the proposed fund raise would have to be halted whilst due diligence was carried out and under such circumstances their would be a news blackout which is pretty much precisely what we currently have! Pure conjecture I accept but it would explain a lot of things which don’t seem quite right at the moment. Any views anyone?