Member Info for fleccy

Obelix I don't know how you can call anyone an idiot, how many QBT shares have you bought? Going off your previous posts I'm guessing well over £100,000 worth; It's likely comparable to betting on a three legged horse in the Epsom Derby.

Oldsharedog, everything in your post is speculation unless you have access to insider information.

You finish off the post with, "Please keep a note - this is going to be huge !!", if that isn't speculative and encouraging investment I don't know what is. You also imply that the market will pile in, in forthcoming days, how do you know that? In truth you don't.

I wont report you, maybe Mikey will since I'm highlighting the hypocrisy that takes place on this board.

"MCap will be irrelevant in the forthcoming days - once the market starts to pile in here"

Misleading and speculative statement attempting to suck in new investors who might believe what you're peddling.

Mikey are you going to report this? Or is it another case of double standards?

" I believe you own no shares, but are happy to be associated with those misleading bashers, I will say no more"

I don't associate, or align with anyone, I hold my own views and post in good conscience. I admit it gets my back up when posts are deleted, as I view it as an attempt to cancel opposing views.

"Nothing wrong with a solid debate but this is ruined by the bashers who are here for their own monetary gain"

I agree solid debate is good, but you, Mikey, and others only want to read positive posts about QBT. Day in, day out you and others talk up QBT's prospects and that's ok, but posters who hold opposing views should have the same right to give their opinion without being deleted. Dooogle if it's ok for you to post multiple times a day to promote your investment, why isn't it ok for others to present their opposing opinion?

"Where is this ramping Fleccy?"

Just look in the mirror.

"I do not particularly care what you think fleccy"

It isn't what I think, it's what everyone knows Mikey. It isn't anyone else's fault you invested in QBT and are probably sitting on a loss, it's no excuse to have entire threads deleted just because the truth hurts.

https://tenor.com/en-GB/view/cant-handle-the-truth-gif-7916035

For your information Mikey, your constant reporting and subsequent deletion of posts makes me even more determined to post. When you report a post the entire thread gets deleted, so you're deleting content friendly toward QBT as well. I get the impression that you're saying "incessant share" ramping is ok? Surely if "incessant share bashers" deserve reporting, then incessant share rampers should be given the same treatment.

No, you report posts that contradict your vested interest and ignore blatant ramping posts that align with your vested interest. It's clear what your motivations are Mikey, anyone with half a brain could see it. Giving an alternative contradictory opinion against the constant ramping isn't contravening chat rules, it just contradicts Mikey's vested interest rules.

I realised what you meant Dooogle, but my point is aimed at Mikey who reports posts that are factual and correct, causing them to be deleted just because he doesn't like what they're saying. If you guys believe in QBT, then you shouldn't cancel contrarian points of view just because you can't think of an argument against them.

"Now let’s look at QBT, this has its method C being trialled with a large chip manufacturer in a multi billion dollar market, its method A is now being demonstrated on commercial ASIC’s its huge gain in mining 2.6x or 160%"

Mikey, why aren't you reporting Dooogle for posting wrong and misleading information? QBT have reported that Method A gives a 10% improvement, not 160%.

"QBTMethod A increases mining performance by nearly 10%"

I don't even invest in QBT and have a better idea of what they've said in their updates.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/QBT/porting-of-methods-a-b-zw04ol3tf8bd9ig.html

"will see them commit to ploughing 10pc of savers’ cash into unlisted assets by 2030"

Effectively mimicking private equity. This looks to be aimed at startups, probably wont do much for listed stocks if I'm understanding the content in the post correctly.

27 posts deleted, by the look of things. Probably be more before the end of the day.

I noticed that yesterday. It was only a week ago that Proactive run a similar article, but in relation to Sky and CityFibre.

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1069809/bt-group-deemed-a-sell-as-ubs-eyes-rising-altnet-competition-1069809.html

https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1069305/bt-group-investors-are-underestimating-the-impact-of-sky-s-defection-to-cityfibre-analyst-1069305.html

UBS appear desperate to damage BT's share price, why else would they release two separate notes just a week apart? Why didn't they just release one note last week? Telecoms in general are down today, I suspect the market has stopped listening to UBS.

"Very strange hey"

What's strange is how posters like you constantly repeat QBT's latest PRN's, as if they somehow mean anything this time when historic PRN's have led to nothing ; What makes you think it's any different this time? QBT have been releasing PRN's since their inception, implying that something substantive is just around the corner, but the illusive corner appears to be moving away as fast as they approach it, like travelling down a tunnel where the exit never seems any closer.

"what shows is that the Bears are very keen on QBT also"

Not me, I wouldn't touch QBT with a bargepole, I am however interested in the psychology of the posters on here. Ramping and de-ramping neither adds, or retracts, from QBT's future prospects. It's clear the rampers on here view this board as influencing the share price, otherwise they would debate negative views rather than having them deleted, it just shows rampers desperation and a lack of belief in QBT on their part, if they truly believed they would ignore the negative posts; It's debatable whether ramping on here encourages people to invest, but some believe it does.

"As and when a deal is signed and announced"

Don't you mean IF "a deal is signed and announced"?

I don't see why signing an NDA warrants the release of a PRN/RNS, why not wait until there's something substantive resulting from any presentation? The PRN's appear to be released with the intention of pumping the price, on this occasion it appears to have fallen flat. In the end all that matters is revenue, in the absence of that everything else is just smoke and mirrors.

Candidabloke trying to get a rise on here, probably a case of too much yeast.

"how dyou know so Fleccy , there is more than one way to accumulate a position without buying stock"

Because QBT is too small a company for any large player to have an interest, it's also not volatile enough to make worthwhile returns from trading the stock. More often than not QBT will see less than 50 trades a day with a total daily values less than £50k, then look at a stock like Lloyds with trades numbering well into the 1000's and daily values well into the 10's, or 100's, of millions of pounds. Clearly it's easier and safer to trade a stock like Lloyds, since the daily values and volumes are massively greater, that's why you can be sure the larger players have no interest in QBT; If they were interested they'd just buy QBT out of petty cash.