Member Info for feelinlucky

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/investing/article-9215119/Tax-year-end-checklist-Ten-things-consider-5-April-2021.html/
comments section- hats off to Crypto Monkey!

the EWT planning permission can't be too far off and what's not to like!

is probably just a 'mix with the investors and answer any questions event' and may not necessarily be presenting anything new

because they're INVESTED ;-) ..................tax write offs also useful for companies

BOIL has £30m tax losses to bank!

could be co-incidental that Corillian are now free to market the Dunrobin prospect again now that the 'exclusivity period with a large European E&P company has ended'.....whatever we are now marketing may have something to do with that? at present Corillian remain in a 'confidentiallity period with an interested party'

Rathlin merger?

it won't be BOIL acquisition as they tend not to discuss such small transactions with shareholders, and farm-outs don't float their boat, whereas WN sale does but not ready yet.........perhaps DELT are back to talk!!!! LOL

..they've had a pre-EWT 'cheeky offer' to buy WN in excess of what they would get with farm-out??????????

...to discuss a potential WN farm-out?

...make sense to market WN yet as CPR not yet in place! IMO

....acquire that 15% of P2478 owned by BOIL?...could take them to the sort of @30%+ they like to hold in prospects they invest in....just guessing

probably after they pay for the EWT, which will happen when planning is granted for the testing....still it would be nice for them to buy now anyway

I make that a 15.7% interest in P2478 to RBD (via Corillian) .......thanks for the heads-up!

the raise may get the MCAP to/past the £50m mark, if it holds we could get new institutional investors onboard?

I'm hoping for an answer to ......are WN-C and WN-D to evaluate a single geological structure or two separate ones?

Ta!.......maybe the field/structures are so big that producing as much as permitted from both sites on each structure will be the norm?

just wondering...with so much development going into WN-A site, are they going to bother to develop the B site? ....surely they will test the oil and compare pressure data between the two sites....but then with hook up to pipeline infrastructure on the longer term if they could get everything they want from the reservoir from site A they could shut the B site and then concentrate further development to the C and D sites?......what do technical folks think re. this, is WN-B a exploration step-out well they have used to measure the size of the structure/ascertain which site was best for development.....or are they likely to develop both WN-a and WN-B?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9179751/Toxic-secrets-mobile-phone-called-green-world-depends-mining-metals.html/ ......makes oil and gas look like releasing beneficial carbon cycle tree food!

RBD on what type of oil was encountered in WNB-1....just how long till they tell us?