RE: RichTeaBiscuit17 Mar 2021 17:55
(1).."Looks like the acquisition could be TradeFlow hTTps://dlt.sg/dltledgers-and...
A side-by-side comparison of the two websites suggests not :
- bullet-point promotional video;
- 'approachable 'chat-bot;
- relevant newsfeed;
- detailed dropdown menus according to area of interest;
- detailed descriptions of a high number of relevant experienced professionals;
- details of transaction volumes and named counterparties, etc, etc.
I can see why SYME might want to buy their skills, but what would it bring to the party...and/or how could it afford to buy it ?
Doesn't seem likely, on the face of it.
(2) OTOH, SYME's interest in the 'inventory in transit' model looks like a subtle change of direction , no coincidence I think that 'trade finance' guru Tony Brown is 'point man' on this.
SYME's version of inventory finance is a novel concept, which is why it's potentially so interesting, but it seems to be proving too 'innovative' to gain traction.
The 'true' sale concept seems to be proving a hard sell, from an accounting and security point of view , perhaps simply because of a 'gut ' reaction on observing the obvious fact that the underlying goods don't actually move.
By definition, this isn't a problem with 'inventory in transit' , moving goods physically across borders, because the questions/conventions/mechanisms of ownership transfer, accounting and funds flow have all been refined over centuries of experience.
The 'supply chain' is typically (1) exporter, (2) exporter's bank (3) port of shipment (4) port of delivery (5) importer's bank and (6) importer.
Traditionally, this involved copious amounts of paperwork : bills of lading, invoices , packing lists, certificates of origin, export permits, phytosanitary or chemical/physical assay certificates, insurance policies etc, in multiple originals an/or certified copies.
I can see how blockchain use could provide greater transparency, simplicity, speed and security, replacing a lot of the above digitally, maybe even scaling back the hitherto crucial role of the 2 x banks in the process. That would be truly revolutionary.
More likely, if there IS a role for SYME, I'd guess it's in the currently 'grey area between (3) and (4) - the actual 'in transit ' bit - where there's wiggle room about where exactly the transfer in one direction of ownership of the goods/in the other the payment undertaking takes place.
There are both actual (freight/insurance) costs and opportunity costs (capital tied up unproductively) that can be quantified.
These have historically been 'rolled up' in the sale or purchase price of the underlying goods, maybe technology makes it feasible (and economically worthwhile) to carve them out and treat them as a 'tradeable' asset class in their own right....?
"SYME : the gift that keeps on giving"
Very interesting to see what actually emerges !