RE: Finished 9.71% up31 Aug 2022 18:03
Seawolf
Unfortunately I cannot sit back and listen to the 5 bag, 10 bag, multi-bag idiots on here. Sorry about that. I would absolutely get behind this stock if I could see a revenue stream that could at least cover costs but it seems to me that is a million miles away still. RNS 1 was a desperate capital raise. Remember Lanstead could have said that they would invest £3m here and now but they didn’t l. And actually they pay more if the stock goes up so how/why do you think they structured the deal as they did? And at at a 25% discount to VWAP each month? So not a positive except it takes insolvency off the table in the immediate.
RNS 2 should have been a given, and would have been a negative if it had failed but nevertheless not a negative. But I have kids of an age who read the bulls!t on these boards and particularly in the crypto mkt so I actually do think some balance is necessary. And if this stock is a golden nugget then it will be so whatever I say. But if I can expose the untruths spouted by the majority of this board, and you know who they are, then I sleep easier.