Member Info for ERV1

burn in 6 months, nope you can't distort facts.

Gino73, it demonstrates that Lloyds and Halifax share dealing department are compliant with regulation (EU 2016/679) regulation, in couldn't make it up world. A whole lot more than can be said for a UK government department that reckoned to be spending £15m on training their staff to be GDPR compliant. When a UK department insists that personal data can only be dealt with by the postal service, in this day and age, it definitely falls into the "couldn't make it up category". 3 weeks and waiting for their written response, that they aim to do in 10 days.

You'll do as we say, and we'll do as we want, as per.

top person, if you're anywhere in the malaga region or the surrounding campo, it would be a pleasure to buy you a drink ...not the 1.99 french stuff though and certainly not accompanied by an english cauliflower

used the phrased last week in a mentoring role. Add to it, "You can have great teachers, but if you don't have a good principal you won't have a good school"

Add to that, "The price of greatness is responsibility" and "All great things are simple, and many can be expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honour, duty, mercy, hope. (WC)

Additionally, albeit WC was one of the founding fathers of the EU he also said " only when plans for uniting Europe take a federal form that we cannot take part, because we cannot subordinate ourselves or the control of British policy to federal authorities"

Perhaps a pre-requisite to any marking on a ballot paper should include for a quick test concerning federalism and it's meaning. Or even pose the question/s, "are you a federalist/can you define federalism?"

In reflecting on the history of politics in this country one can draw ones own conclusions as to how this debacle may have been managed by a true leader/s or would this state of affairs even have been allowed to happen?

quality post calisto

Birmingham need to win tomorrow then

Oxo42 - like a red rag to a bull in the current climate. An afternoon later ... my instructions will be adhered to, cos plan B and adiosky for him if they weren't. He's a brexiteer with a substantial Lloyds holding too, as it happens.

Best bit was the paragraph following on from the extraction "I know that you are an experienced investor ...etc etc etc etc"

he is a charted financial planner, been with him 9 years. Does that extract imply what I think it does?

Most certainly not. Just being irritated by various including my interpretation of this:

"If our advice is not to proceed with the transfer, then our general policy is not to facilitate the withdrawal on an insistent client basis, as if we don't believe it's the right thing to do we shouldn't do it."

Can this be interpreted in any way than how I'm interpreting it? Can anybody point me in the direction of the precise powers an IFA has over client investments/client instructions?

Feedback appreciated before I blow a fuse. TIA

of hours later ... only one thing comes to mind - ffs shut the f up, to a habitual argumentative contrarian whining summat or other... in the real world, that is.

**** and ****yourself stuff, if ever. Filtering is for coffee. Yorkshire builders tea is the order of day. End of.
Shake hands, walk away, good luck to you too.

Hello tj2, well you know I'm made of the same stuff as you, don't you? So fortunate to be acquainted with so many in the male-orientated industries/sectors ... bottom up n all that. 8 years+ later, I only happened to be in a room with over 600 of them last Tuesday ... couldn't help myself (black cashmere or not - again) Your ta-ra was noted.

Crowcast, I suggest that you use the correct gendered noun in addressing anything to me - the ASS to the fore yet again.

You on Sat 11:20 "We really should be getting the current electorates view on a very different and concerning set of circumstances over which no one has control"
You on Sat 13.54 to another: "You come across as a person who tries to start an argument but can't think of anything sensible to say when they think about it. Try thinking before you type"

You "The funny thing is at no point did I make any claim for polls"
You Sat 14:39 - your link is to what? In response to what?
You Sat 15:19 - "I believe the Wakefield Express ............
You 16.:48 - " A poll of 8000 is better .........
You Sat 21.:49 - YouGov polls referencing

You 21:16 "Assuming you know what the population think because of a limited number we individually know or based om our own views is not a great idea".

You Sun 10:47 - "A petition like that can not be viewed as an evidenced realistic view of public opinion".

I don't need to assume different avatars, nor do I identify as anything other than what I was at birth ,or in the real world that I inhabit. Nor was there any requirement that I disclosed my "real world" exercise being carried out over the course of a week, that I didn't conclude until Sunday evening. Funny or forgot have no relevance. Straight from the horses mouths stuff is real - expletives and all.

With an argument that is lacking on so many counts, you just carry on posting in your habitual argumentative/contrarian nonsense "not a bloke" style, in your own little world, where you clearly forget to take a long hard look in the mirror - repeatedly - and I who swallowed nothing that was written on the side of a bus, will continue with my habitual early rising.

Yep, you keep supporting hypocrisy from the top down, and the likes of Yvette Cooper who needs a reminder that the moral source of political authority lies ultimately with the people and not the politicians. Equity Cards for the pair of you.

yes and they also need to remember it's the early bird that catches the worm

thanks for responding kenny. All is good and hope the same for you. The prompt to ask you resulted from the response I got on some feedback I gave, which made me question "who or how many are actually testing it and for how long?"

"thing" I did over the course of last week and this weekend was carry out my own poll among a cross-section of a younger generation.

Question1: Would you be happy to vote again on the binary vote of "in or out?"
Question 2: Have you or any of those that you associate with changed your minds on the way that you voted in 2016?
Question 3: What is the general consensus on the current state of play, with you, your friends and associates and/or your work colleagues or your fellow students?
Question 4: What are your general thoughts on the current state of play of Brexit and is the subject matter discussed daily in your social circles?

Responses generally contradicted virtually all of the polling results that a "bloke" posted links to over this weekend.
The cross section of younger folk was far from confined to one county.
A "bloke" referred to limited numbers within their weekend posting ... So if you know and have access to huge numbers what does one define as limited? Polls are trying to depict 8000 as being representative of a country, therefore I believe that several hundred adequately provides me with the thoughts of a younger generation.

Incidentally some of the responses to those questions fall in line with UTT posting style - colourful.

Just sharing a bit of real world stuff, with real people.

yes Trent700 in total agreement and the precise reason I referred to the Rule of Law in first joining the brexit debate on the Lloyds forum on Saturday.

Put it to the judiciary to test.

hi, just wondered, have you or any other TECA's been testing the new LSE site and providing feedback?

Glen Close - Albert Nobbs style?

yes Wids and for many months I was over there and got the opportunity to converse with so many about their reasoning and beliefs it became evident that he was going to win. Can remember the call I took from Tampa before the result was made officially known. First thoughts were ... polls?

Moral of tale as you say - never underestimate. Or alternatively operate with prudence or hedge your bets and in the current state of affairs "where the hell was plan B?" Can recall on GC when we were chatting brexit in 2016, questioning whether there was a plan B.