Member Info for ERV1

Pot, kettle and black continuously Crowcast

"Why add insults by the way? - they add nothing to you case, and you look dim when they clearly apply to you more than the person you try to insult."

I refer you to your own post at 19.42 on Saturday - just one post of many insulting ones from you to others. If you can give it then you should also be able to take it. Oh but then in your world it all becomes bullying does it not? I was waiting for you to use that word in a post and you did. As I said Equity Card or pampers is your best bet.

Oh so now you want to chat tangible? Well given that I've stated my reasons for voting out, an educated person would be able to ascertain where tangibility comes in. However, as you clearly enjoy repetition dressed up in different formats which part of my reasoning do you require further explanation on?

"You should get your facts straight about MP's who are clearly doing what they think best for their constituents before trying to stir up trouble for them on here." The pathetic content of that statement gives even more clarity as to where you stand or perhaps sit, or even lay, in life.You are providing the evidence of realism.

Further if you are intent on changing the wording of any of my posts based on your own interpretation then maybe think long and hard as the ASS in you is becoming increasingly more evident.

Yes, let's go back to the beginning and start again. We were given a binary vote - in or out. The next options being deal or no deal, as so many other posters have stressed. So instead of all your nonsense posting maybe you can give a bit more clarity as to which of those choices you do not comprehend?

Black n White stuff.

well said Pillarts. Nothing wrong with gin utt ...

I'm confused? Perhaps an Equity Card might be the best bet for both Yvette Cooper and yourself, that or a regular delivery of extra large pampers.

as per LEVIS post at 03.32 on Thursday ... plan B kicks in - coat and adiosky. Modelo 720 instead of 210 for many.

porridge here and next weekend I will be breakfasting with my activist SNP members of the clan in the highlands, whose views I respect in the upholding of democracy. Makes for interesting conversations - if nothing else. Not unlike the ones we have with the spaniards who for the most part are the equivalent of labour remainers who are passionate about their beliefs. Not unlike the conversations we have over the pond, with those who display the most passion about their constitutional rights.
Real world stuff ...

versus the link in your 21.49 post

Yvette Cooper has reneged on her vow to her 69.26% Leave constituents, that she would uphold the result of the referendum. She is unfit for office and must be deselected. Please sign and share: deselect Yvette Cooper. https://www.change.org/p/normanton-pontefract-castleford-clp-deselect-yvette-cooper-mp?recruiter=702469790&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition&fbclid=IwAR0cKSMIlLZj743XMSXA4eBVjVwu7Jw3vVGlfmxFSD4XImFIz4tMeusQKAY

Evidenced realism based on the opinions of those who have signed and applicable to just one person - Cooper.

Given that you posted the link then it would read like you believe the methodology deployed based on the stated numbers polled is a true representation of all those eligible to vote throughout the country. How on earth does the polling of so few produce a true representation of the views of so many.

Not only do you rely on media reporting to support your nonsense argument, you are also reliant on what the pollsters predict. Clearly you were never employed as an odds compiler.

In answer to you: The leave percentages for Yorkshire are retained in my memory for the most part however for the purpose of accuracy to 2 decimal points I only have to refer to my notebook.

and to clarify, I assume nothing in life, better to leave the making an ASS of themselves to you.

of these leave voter percentages, do you believe have passed on or changed their minds Crowcast?

Or perhaps you are of the opinion that such high percentages for all of those who voted leave in Yorkshire is due to ignorance or lack of understanding?

Or even that these voters didn't comprehend the binary vote on offer x2?

Doncaster 68.96%
Barnsley 68.31%
Rotherham 67.89%
Wakefield 66.36%
East Riding 60.4%
Selby 59.17%
Calderdale 55.68%
Kirklees 54.67%
Bradford 54.23%
Sheffield 50.99%

Without exception I have yet to come across an "out" voter who is not of the opinion that NO deal is the only way to escape from the shackles. Clearly, other than on this forum you are not in the fortunate position of having such conversations with joe public.

Leeds 49.69%
Harrogate 49.03%
York 41.96%

Just for balance.

Crowcast

Political and economical liberalisation in upholding the four basic elements of democracy.
The knowledge that a future for our offspring will be free from the stifling, preferred risk management strategy of the EU regulators.
A tailored immigration policy with a quantifiable impact - for the better - of our future generations.
As all indicators have proven the UK is way ahead of the European Union in growth terms, the outlook is promising - once unshackled.

and to conclude

Most importantly that the whole of our history and what our forefathers fought so hard for is not forgotten.

you really do talk out of your rear end, bloke.

As a determined realist my definition of "the real world" is applicable to all that is actual and experienced.

Your "bloke" world is evidently based on whatever you can manage to google to support your nonsense posting.

We never forget, we are Leeds, do we?

are you for real? Who reads that comic - The Wakefield Express? About 33k circulation. Poll 24% of readership and 15% would like a second vote... Real proportional representation going on in their reporting then.

By even wanting to chat such nonsense, your ignorance shines through, hence the "not the real world" posting that you clearly subscribe to.

Ah so you are reliant on media reporting for your facts then? circa 5,000 of the people polled is far from adequate representation of what joe public think or want. If you are going to post those sort of links then at the very least do your sums first, especially when it's about representation of the electorate.

Andrea Jenkyns understands that, and the reason a.n.o. was ousted from the not safe seat. Infact, Andrea Jenkyns has got more balls than Mr & Mrs Balls jointly.

Pots, kettle and black coming from you Crowcast - sensible indeed! Your posting is way beyond a joke. If you want a clearer view of how the current electorate think take yourself to WF8, 9 or 10, just for starters. Or ask yourself why there is a petition to deselect that one who'll be putting her name down for Strictly or Bake-off, seen as she enjoys following in her husbands footsteps. That safe seat that they've both sat in, may no longer be.

The Rule of Law is about where we are at and it's up to the judiciary to put current "happenings" to the test. Clearly your version of democracy and all that went before us in history, differs dramatically from the regular posters on here, who just happen to live in the real world and have a far greater knowledge and understanding of the "what" than you have ever displayed in your posting.

"85% of customers we talk to we convert and they end up signing a contract with Toople"

Said in that context means not a great deal.

85% of how many? how many are existing? 85% is applicable to which month, as it certainly isn't applicable across the board, when based on what the person in the know has stated previously?

Not long to wait to test the 85% statement against the actuals - true or false?

It doesn't go un-noticed, that in your clued up state, you have chosen not to share your knowledge on the handset offer.

We may perhaps have one thing in common, as the only shorts in my life are those I wear to the beach or by the pool.

Oh and my reading glasses serve me well in the vision stakes.

Only a week for the first 6 months to complete, so not long to wait for the actuals. They will then be fed into my spreadsheets and the analysis will provide the facts that have been given a wide-berth, in the reporting of the numbers, that matter and for comparison within the sector. Evidence of all the "For the Record" will become clear - no need for any claptrap or twaddle.

Did you miss a bit out on purpose?

Explore other avenues?

"so the company would have sufficient extra funds to pursue and explore other avenues, Example - provide mobile phones SIM cards"

"Following on from the Group's funding partnership with HHF, as announced on 31 May 2016, Toople is now able to offer business mobiles and SIM cards to SMEs via the o2 network. As a result of this partnership agreement, Toople is now providing handsets with unlimited calls, texts and data bundles, to its SME customers at a significant discount to the average market price over the last 12 months. The Board believes this will give the Company a material advantage during its initial growth stage as the Company seeks to rapidly acquire new customers."

Perhaps the "clued-up" one can tell us whether the handset offer remains a part of the strategy - or not - in the exploration of avenues that give the company a material advantage - or not.

post of the highest order

"There be some of you totally clueless what I am talking about"

"so the company would have sufficient extra funds to pursue and explore other avenues, Example - provide mobile phones SIM cards"

really?

just serves to demonstrate the level of knowledge and intelligence of the poster...

currently about 4-5 weeks worth of admin expenses in monetary terms, I believe

Customers/contracts/RGU's/ARPU/ARPA - once the actual figures are disclosed, we can calculate, as near as damn it, so the use of percentages in the chosen script, fools nobody.

Interesting that it's taken so long to realise that the revenue model for wholesale/reselling deployed as part of the business model, at the outset, was the wrong choice, hence the change of strategy only now being stated. "Top down" would have been pie in the sky stuff courtesy of we know who.

not "will"

The contract duration is for an initial three years and is expected to deliver at least £3.5 million in additional revenue to the Company spread over that period. It is expected to be accretive to monthly revenues after an initial six month period.

GP % of said expected is?

The average household subscription for bundled services/ those taking up several RGU's would provide a higher gp margin than the "expected" return on the "expected" £3.5m contract over 3 years.