Member Info for ERV1

Crowcast, my opener was pure sarcasm based on how you read, that you then duly confirmed. If we're doing who has had what, when it comes to the EU administration/wages/expenses you're going to have to do a lot better with your researching. As champion of any sort of persuasive argument, on any given subject, you are not.

Given that you are not into empirical, are you able to back up that statement "Instead he has probably more than any other MEP collected a salary and expenses for no constructive effort for the last 20 years"?

"Strange" ... if the cap fits.

I don't do the malts - that's their forte. When they come to us in Spain they tell me the good stuff is cheaper than in their neck of the woods ... However, when one of theirs runs a now Diageo owned distillery, well ...

MacDonald eh? Ross was ours on maternal side, but there are a few Macs in there for good measure - in the breeding thing. Ireland is where some of it started, a good few generations back.

Anyway the emphasis I previously gave to the no politics in drink, worked. April at Loch Lomond = no political discussions whatsoever.

LEVIS, my clan up there, are part of her clan - not just members but activists to boot. It's like parallel universe stuff especially when they've given the malt a bit of stick. Love em, however when we're in company and the alc is flowing I have had to emphasise that we do not chat politics. Who the heck wants to chat Trident into the early hours? They do.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-7076141/RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-stupid-people-got-wrong-again.html

Boomer, paperbag, marigolds n sick bucket stuff. Where do you two "juans" pitch yourselves then, in Clooney/Banderas world ... on a Tuesday morning in May?

big giveaways, different avatars but forget to change their posting style

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7074937/Farage-PM-EU-poll-results-repeated-general-election.html

oops - BP 70% v Lab 30% and BP 81% v 19% Con

substitute regions for constituencies - oops

There are all sorts of alternatives for greater balance:

Actual numbers in 10 constituencies (excl. Ireland & Scotland) Brexit Party 62% v Lib Dems 38% - there or thereabouts.
or Brexit Party 77% v Cons 23% or Brexit Party 57% v Labour 43% ...

Sure a.n.o. will correct the near as damn it percentages based on actual numbers, although I can't see a persuasive argument against real numbers.

Another alternative would be:

How many regions were won by THE Brexit Party?
In a FPP scenario which party would be the outright winner?

If we're doing alternatives we may as well keep it balanced.

Oxo42, I believe Dominic has the right credentials to be PM and that he clearly displayed the courage of his convictions in resigning the post of Brexit Secretary in November 18. He has stated on numerous occasions that he would be willing to walk away with no deal - albeit as the final/last resort.

Brexit apart, there are proposals that he advocates for, that are aligned to what I dedicated a large part of my working life to. In addition his parentage stands him in good stead. I note he's a boxing fan too - like you and me (not that that has any relevance).

All of that apart, I read your Friday post and those aggravators - been thinking about you since, do you need assistance? Many memories evoked on that one and how low-lifes can impact on the last bit of independence of a parent.

Dominic's piece in the Mail

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7070809/DOMINIC-RAAB-speaks-Mail-Sunday-officially-enters-leadership-race.html

Hope you had a peaceful period of reflection.

That court case may be heard in June - read it somewhere over the weekend.

Any competent investor would know this is not listed on the AIM. Any competent investor would know the accumulated deficit increase in April - and for many more months to come - is eating away at the cash and that at the last shout there was no overdraft facility.

Fiction section on kindle, could be a comparison.

and nor do you need to be a rocket scientist to calculate the cpa using the mcc/ca simple method is totally inadequate for a cash-flow forecast. The LTV:CAC using the correct (complex) method, tells the true story, when applied to the interims.

no need for me to ask the BoD, as AH use of abstraction language obscures nothing about "the story" - plenty of food for thought though, based on fact/s and perhaps one for the gullible to question.

1. Why has the Operating Loss increased by 18%?
2. Why did the admin expenses increase by 44%?
3. How many actual SME's are contracted when the accumulated deficit is in excess of £5.2m?
4. Actual marketing spend in £'s/actual new customers over the 6 months? Cost of acquiring?

good evening dear lady, your "pal" is clearly a first class pr*ck